This won't do.
This is one of the most unfunniest ones, Psy. I'm sorry, but you could've done something better with the animations at least. #23 was the most pointless, and unfunny. You need to stop using the same ideas over and over again.
..and to the people who say it's good and say everyone else is wrong, fuck you. Get your own opinion.
Sorry Psy
Sorry, but I really thought the movie downright sucked. The humor was blah, the voice acting was horrible, and the animation I feel needs major work. I think it's just a laugh, Psy. You can do so much better, and got better potential... your just not showing it. You should take more time on it.
P.S
I'd suggest to not respond to comments, Psy. As a word of wisdom, if you keep those up, your asking for war. I'd suggest taking it down out of concern to prevent an internet war.
*LOL* If people are going to be dicks I'm going to respond to it! What the hell? You can say nasty things about me but I can't?! What the fuck ever!
Ok people! Move along! Nothing to see here!
Sonic as a human? I've seen that before a long time ago in some guys fan art for an Archie comic. I still don't like the voice acting by the way. I don't like the art either. "Speed?" The name has been taken. (Speed racer) Double? Shade? Fists? I see nothing original or funny.
SUCKED!!!
listen......im not one of those poeple that vote bad scores for things for the heck of it.that was just plain out stupid. OH! & to answer SHADES question as too why they need diffrent names is so sega doesnt sue psyguy for using their charictures!!!the soda one......LAME!!!!!! it made no sense, DOUBLE was drinking a soda & then his face got caught in it while disomboied heads are staring a SHADE.seriously man.....you can do better stuff than that.
Amazing. No, really.
This feature had the following qualities:
1. Generic, cliche, unoriginal anime artwork.
2. Some of the worst geek humor I've ever seen implemented in a movie that didn't star a 4 year old school girl in a panda bear suit.
3. Absence of any real animation.
4. No plot, purpose, or cohesive storyline.
5. Awesome 80s childhood cartoon names that give the average 9 year old a feeling of "totally killer" such as "Shade" or "Speed."
So the only potential score raising attribute was the artwork.
Now before the "artist" or others decide to flame me with shit like:
"it takes talent" and "he's a good artist and I'd like to see you do better"
let me clear a few things up:
1. ANYONE can draw like that with the right guidelines and a week of time to burn.
2. There is nothing original about it. It's factory anatomy with no creative value.
3. It's overdone and obnoxious.
4. It's blatantly disturbing. Sexual themes, excessive violence, and obscure storylines. Now consider the fact they almost always look about 12 years old. Add in the strange coincidence that a lot of asian models look about half their age(japanese schoolgirl outfit is quite popular) and you have a recipe for closet/confused pedophiles who are big fans of this fucking shit.
I know I have some anger management problems, but at least I'm not a sexually confused pervert.
I guess I just wasted a lot of my time writing this, but at least I got to vent.