Interesting, but wrong...
Though it looked quite nice, you're still wrong, Wikipedia is _not_ an online encyclopedia "of all things" (what your looking for is probably Everything2)...
Reviews for "Fred the Notable Monkey"
JKR responds:
Ah, well perhaps I should have been more clear that I simply do not like the way they go about deleting things. To tell someone their life's work is "non-notable" and nothing else does not seem right to me. But I'm glad you liked the art of the cartoon. Sorry we couldn't agree on this topic. Thanks for leaving a review!
.......
Craptastic to say the least, i mean i'm all for monkeys but this one's lame...
JKR responds:
Sorry you didn't enjoy it. I hope there is something on Newgrounds you find more to your taste. Thanks for leaving a review!
Nice Looking but stupid
This movie looked and sounded good, but its message was stupid.
Wikipedia isn't for aspiring young artists to promote themselves if no one on there has heard of you then you are non notable and should be removed from wikipedia. If you need to promote your site to people find a more appropriate forum than an encyclopedia.
JKR responds:
Wikipedia, as I understand it, set out to be a comprehensive online encyclopedia of all things. Now, if a website that has updated for three years with new cartoons and won several awards is "non-notable" I believe they have set their encyclopedia standards much too high. But that's just me. And I don't agree with their methods for telling people they are non-notable.
Sorry you didn't enjoy the cartoon, but thanks for leaving a review!
Two thumbs down
The voice was really annoying. The graphics were okay.
But honestly, no one wants to hear you whine. Grow up, then try to make flash. If you don't like wikipedia, then don't use it and shut your face about it.
JKR responds:
That is ridiculous to me. If you believe what you are saying, why did you write this review? Seriously, think about it. You are saying "If you don't like something, shut up and don't say anything about it." Why did you not take your own advice then? Why did you write a review complaining about the cartoon you did not like? It is the exact same thing. I hope you see that. I don't agree that if you think something needs changed you shouldn't speak out about how it could improve. If you did not tell me "The graphics were okay" then how would I know and improve them? Without feedback there is no way for people to know ways of getting better.
Anyway, sorry you didn't enjoy the cartoon. I hope there is something on Newgrounds that you find more enjoyable.
no there right you do suck
what a wast of your time. you actualy made a protest animation for Wikipedia because they said you suck. well now your tireless efforts paid off, now newgrounds thinks you suck to. and by the way what the hell is going on with crap like this getting on front page? Tom Fulp! get off your ass and do some f*&^ing work!
JKR responds:
Just so you know, it is "they're right", not there right. And "suck to" should be "suck too" with two o's.
Sorry you didn't enjoy the cartoon. Hope you find something else on Newgrounds you like better. And I hope that you will be a bit more fair in your next review, because putting all 0's just because you don't like something is not the way to go. The overal score can be 0, but a 0 in sound means there was not sound, and there was.