And you can tell Wikipedia what to do because?
If you don't like it don't use it. They can change their own bloody website if they want to!
Reviews for "Fred the Notable Monkey"
JKR responds:
Of course they can, but at the same time it is MY work they are judging. I think they seem to have forgotten that there are other human beings on the other end. Instead of telling someone "You fail" they could very easily explain how to improve. I disagree with the way they are going about it. I have no problem whatsoever with them deleting Fred the Monkey from their site.
Thank you for taking the time to leave a review.
ur so wrong
dude wikipedia rocks and but can only be so big, the animation made me laugh but ur wrong about it
JKR responds:
Well, I personally think since it is on the ever expanding Internet, it CAN'T be only "so big" but that is just my opinion. At the very least, I think they should change the method they use to reject people, because it is much too harsh and impersonal. Saying "non-notable" and "fail" is not the way to tell people you don't think they are large enough to be in your "encyclopedia" in my opinion.
Anyway, glad you liked the animation, and thank you for taking the time to write a review! It is appriciated.
So freggin what
To be frank... no one gives a monkeys about your wikipedia entry
No one really cares about your website, so no-one cares
The voices were annoying
Wikipedia can do what they want
90% of artists know your talking bullshit about the "giving up dreams" thing
JKR responds:
Let's go in order.
Several people care about my wikipedia entry, otherwise they would have not made it in the first place. I did not make it, and I personally do not care if Fred is in Wikipedia or not.
Next, thousands of people who visit the site monthy probably disagree with you that no one cares about the site. Perhaps you don't but there are people who do.
Third, yes, many people have told me the voices are annoying. However those are the voices the characters have, much as the voices that we have cannot be changed. We have to live with the voice we get. (At least I've never heard of anyone changing voices...)
Wikipedia can indeed do what they want. However I have a problem with how they go about doing what they do, and so I made a cartoon about it. Which I can also do if I want, just as Wikipedia can choose to ignore it.
Perhaps 90% of the artists who did NOT give up their dreams think I am talking crap, but I tell you that is the statistic I learned when I was in art school. You can choose to believe it or not, but it is what I was taught. If you have data to prove otherwise, I would certainly be interested in seeing it, and request that you publish this information, perhaps at Wikipedia.org.
Thank you for taking the time to leave a review. I'm sorry to hear you didn't like the cartoon, but I hope you will find something on Newgrounds you like more.
holy gheyzor
That was really bad. Didn't make me smile or nothing. I didn't like it at all, the voices were bad and just... it was just boring. Kiddie stuff.
JKR responds:
Well sorry you didn't enjoy it. Thank you for at least being fair in the individual scores and not giving it a 0 in everything like some people do. I hope you will find something on Newgrounds you enjoy more. =)
Interesting, but wrong...
Though it looked quite nice, you're still wrong, Wikipedia is _not_ an online encyclopedia "of all things" (what your looking for is probably Everything2)...
JKR responds:
Ah, well perhaps I should have been more clear that I simply do not like the way they go about deleting things. To tell someone their life's work is "non-notable" and nothing else does not seem right to me. But I'm glad you liked the art of the cartoon. Sorry we couldn't agree on this topic. Thanks for leaving a review!