At 3/30/22 10:39 AM, TecNoir wrote:

At 3/30/22 08:00 AM, bumbaclad wrote:

At 3/29/22 08:24 PM, EdyKel wrote:

As if the color of someones skin determines their experience in this world and warrants any assumptions by others; racist line of thinking. Wake up.

To claim that skin color has no bearing on people's experiences is simply a denial of facts. You think skin color had no bearing 100 years ago? You think the aftermath of the civil rights movement ended racism?

Bloomberg: Job Applicants With ‘Black Names’ Still Less Likely to Get Interviews (2021)

At 3/30/22 11:43 AM, bumbaclad wrote:

At 3/30/22 10:39 AM, TecNoir wrote:

At 3/30/22 08:00 AM, bumbaclad wrote:

At 3/29/22 08:24 PM, EdyKel wrote:

As if the color of someones skin determines their experience in this world and warrants any assumptions by others; racist line of thinking. Wake up.

To claim that skin color has no bearing on people's experiences is simply a denial of facts. You think skin color had no bearing 100 years ago? You think the aftermath of the civil rights movement ended racism?

Bloomberg: Job Applicants With ‘Black Names’ Still Less Likely to Get Interviews (2021)

As if Bloomberg is a trustworthy source of information and I did not say skin color had no bearing, case in point the post I was replying to using skin color as a defining characteristic, so stop trying to spread disinformation.

At 3/30/22 11:43 AM, bumbaclad wrote:

At 3/30/22 10:39 AM, TecNoir wrote:

At 3/30/22 08:00 AM, bumbaclad wrote:

At 3/29/22 08:24 PM, EdyKel wrote:

As if the color of someones skin determines their experience in this world and warrants any assumptions by others; racist line of thinking. Wake up.

To claim that skin color has no bearing on people's experiences is simply a denial of facts. You think skin color had no bearing 100 years ago? You think the aftermath of the civil rights movement ended racism?

Bloomberg: Job Applicants With ‘Black Names’ Still Less Likely to Get Interviews (2021)

As if Bloomberg is a trustworthy source of information and I did not say skin color had no bearing, case in point the post I was replying to using skin color as a defining characteristic, so stop trying to spread disinformation.

At 3/30/22 12:26 PM, TecNoir wrote:

At 3/30/22 11:43 AM, bumbaclad wrote:

At 3/30/22 10:39 AM, TecNoir wrote:

At 3/30/22 08:00 AM, bumbaclad wrote:

At 3/29/22 08:24 PM, EdyKel wrote:

As if the color of someones skin determines their experience in this world and warrants any assumptions by others; racist line of thinking. Wake up.

To claim that skin color has no bearing on people's experiences is simply a denial of facts. You think skin color had no bearing 100 years ago? You think the aftermath of the civil rights movement ended racism?

Bloomberg: Job Applicants With ‘Black Names’ Still Less Likely to Get Interviews (2021)

As if Bloomberg is a trustworthy source of information and I did not say skin color had no bearing, case in point the post I was replying to using skin color as a defining characteristic, so stop trying to spread disinformation.

disinformation

Did you read the article? Would you like me to find the studies for you? Do you have any actual criticism of the content of the article?

At 3/30/22 03:21 PM, bumbaclad wrote:

At 3/30/22 12:26 PM, TecNoir wrote:

At 3/30/22 11:43 AM, bumbaclad wrote:

At 3/30/22 10:39 AM, TecNoir wrote:

At 3/30/22 08:00 AM, bumbaclad wrote:

At 3/29/22 08:24 PM, EdyKel wrote:

As if the color of someones skin determines their experience in this world and warrants any assumptions by others; racist line of thinking. Wake up.

To claim that skin color has no bearing on people's experiences is simply a denial of facts. You think skin color had no bearing 100 years ago? You think the aftermath of the civil rights movement ended racism?

Bloomberg: Job Applicants With ‘Black Names’ Still Less Likely to Get Interviews (2021)

As if Bloomberg is a trustworthy source of information and I did not say skin color had no bearing, case in point the post I was replying to using skin color as a defining characteristic, so stop trying to spread disinformation.

disinformation

Did you read the article? Would you like me to find the studies for you? Do you have any actual criticism of the content of the article?

Where to start? The fact they did not site the study for us to reference or the fact that it is twenty years old by their own account? Yes, I would need to review the study to see how accurate it is and if it even holds merit on the subject and if the data was peer reviewed by a non-partial party. They only first reference that study prior to referencing some guys local survey which it appears this claim was made from so I don't trust a word of that article.

So likely that article is disinformation but my disinformation accusation was due to your inference of what I said as if it is more accurate then my own words; an attempt at changing my statement into some fictional unreasonable binary.

At 3/30/22 11:57 AM, EdyKel wrote:

At 3/30/22 08:00 AM, bumbaclad wrote:

At 3/29/22 08:24 PM, EdyKel wrote:

As if the color of someones skin determines their experience in this world and warrants any assumptions by others; racist line of thinking. Wake up.

Well, with people saying "Just say you want whites to go extinct." over the most non-offensive comment, It would explain why there are still huge racial disparities to this day in incarceration rates, wealth, and representation, in this country. There are those in the dominate racial group in this country, which controls the majority of wealth, jobs, and positions of power, who view those who are not part of it as a threat to it. It's just how it is, how it has always been.

At 3/30/22 03:37 PM, EdyKel wrote:

At 3/30/22 03:21 PM, bumbaclad wrote:

At 3/30/22 12:26 PM, TecNoir wrote:

At 3/30/22 11:43 AM, bumbaclad wrote:

At 3/30/22 10:39 AM, TecNoir wrote:

At 3/30/22 08:00 AM, bumbaclad wrote:

At 3/29/22 08:24 PM, EdyKel wrote:

As if the color of someones skin determines their experience in this world and warrants any assumptions by others; racist line of thinking. Wake up.

To claim that skin color has no bearing on people's experiences is simply a denial of facts. You think skin color had no bearing 100 years ago? You think the aftermath of the civil rights movement ended racism?

Bloomberg: Job Applicants With ‘Black Names’ Still Less Likely to Get Interviews (2021)

As if Bloomberg is a trustworthy source of information and I did not say skin color had no bearing, case in point the post I was replying to using skin color as a defining characteristic, so stop trying to spread disinformation.

disinformation

Did you read the article? Would you like me to find the studies for you? Do you have any actual criticism of the content of the article?

Where to start? The fact they did not site the study for us to reference or the fact that it is twenty years old by their own account? Yes, I would need to review the study to see how accurate it is and if it even holds merit on the subject and if the data was peer reviewed by a non-partial party. They only first reference that study prior to referencing some guys local survey which it appears this claim was made from so I don't trust a word of that article.

So likely that article is disinformation but my disinformation accusation was due to your inference of what I said as if it is more accurate then my own words; an attempt at changing my statement into some fictional unreasonable binary.

I noticed that your not posting any sources to counter it, which most likely means you can't defend your own claims against the mountain of statistics, and studies, against it, that you can find anywhere. So, at this point, you are the one promoting misinformation. No amount of projections, and deflection, on your part will change that.

At 3/30/22 03:45 PM, bumbaclad wrote:

At 3/30/22 11:57 AM, EdyKel wrote:

At 3/30/22 08:00 AM, bumbaclad wrote:

At 3/29/22 08:24 PM, EdyKel wrote:

As if the color of someones skin determines their experience in this world and warrants any assumptions by others; racist line of thinking. Wake up.

Well, with people saying "Just say you want whites to go extinct." over the most non-offensive comment, It would explain why there are still huge racial disparities to this day in incarceration rates, wealth, and representation, in this country. There are those in the dominate racial group in this country, which controls the majority of wealth, jobs, and positions of power, who view those who are not part of it as a threat to it. It's just how it is, how it has always been.

You cannot blame people for being successful as if everyone who is successful do so at the determinant of others. Race may have been a factor for many people starting from a lower class today due to past injustices but should never be the focus today as it is an antiquated factor. I would go as far to say that there will always be disparities that could be grouped by race because people will never be equal as we are all individuals and all with unique experiences and there are many ways people can group others to reach their desired result. Considering the majority of Americans came here after the slave trade to escape their own instances of oppression, some more vile then others, also started in a very low class and suffered from similar racial bias. I am thankful we corrected those wrongs and do not wish to repeat it.

At 3/30/22 10:10 AM, DioShiba wrote:

At 3/30/22 10:07 AM, DamnedByFate wrote:

At 3/29/22 07:42 PM, PigLice wrote: Just say you want whites to go extinct. Simpler.

I want humans to go extinct.

Well we're pretty much well on the path to that with the Ukraine-Russia crisis potentially taking a turn toward Nuclear Warfare.

At 3/30/22 03:46 PM, bumbaclad wrote:

At 3/30/22 03:37 PM, EdyKel wrote:

At 3/30/22 03:21 PM, bumbaclad wrote:

At 3/30/22 12:26 PM, TecNoir wrote:

At 3/30/22 11:43 AM, bumbaclad wrote:

At 3/30/22 10:39 AM, TecNoir wrote:

At 3/30/22 08:00 AM, bumbaclad wrote:

At 3/29/22 08:24 PM, EdyKel wrote:

As if the color of someones skin determines their experience in this world and warrants any assumptions by others; racist line of thinking. Wake up.

To claim that skin color has no bearing on people's experiences is simply a denial of facts. You think skin color had no bearing 100 years ago? You think the aftermath of the civil rights movement ended racism?

Bloomberg: Job Applicants With ‘Black Names’ Still Less Likely to Get Interviews (2021)

As if Bloomberg is a trustworthy source of information and I did not say skin color had no bearing, case in point the post I was replying to using skin color as a defining characteristic, so stop trying to spread disinformation.

disinformation

Did you read the article? Would you like me to find the studies for you? Do you have any actual criticism of the content of the article?

Where to start? The fact they did not site the study for us to reference or the fact that it is twenty years old by their own account? Yes, I would need to review the study to see how accurate it is and if it even holds merit on the subject and if the data was peer reviewed by a non-partial party. They only first reference that study prior to referencing some guys local survey which it appears this claim was made from so I don't trust a word of that article.

So likely that article is disinformation but my disinformation accusation was due to your inference of what I said as if it is more accurate then my own words; an attempt at changing my statement into some fictional unreasonable binary.

I noticed that your not posting any sources to counter it, which most likely means you can't defend your own claims against the mountain of statistics, and studies, against it, that you can find anywhere. So, at this point, you are the one promoting misinformation. No amount of projections, and deflection, on your part will change that.

Sources of what? I wasent the one linking nonsense articles. Why would I bother searching for or even believe there are studies countering some random false narrative?

At 3/30/22 04:09 PM, DamnedByFate wrote:

At 3/30/22 10:10 AM, DioShiba wrote:

At 3/30/22 10:07 AM, DamnedByFate wrote:

At 3/29/22 07:42 PM, PigLice wrote: Just say you want whites to go extinct. Simpler.

I want humans to go extinct.

Well we're pretty much well on the path to that with the Ukraine-Russia crisis potentially taking a turn toward Nuclear Warfare.

Perhaps I should support Republicans after all, on the grounds that they're more likely to strike preemptively.

At 3/30/22 04:07 PM, EdyKel wrote:

At 3/30/22 03:45 PM, bumbaclad wrote:

At 3/30/22 11:57 AM, EdyKel wrote:

At 3/30/22 08:00 AM, bumbaclad wrote:

At 3/29/22 08:24 PM, EdyKel wrote:

As if the color of someones skin determines their experience in this world and warrants any assumptions by others; racist line of thinking. Wake up.

Well, with people saying "Just say you want whites to go extinct." over the most non-offensive comment, It would explain why there are still huge racial disparities to this day in incarceration rates, wealth, and representation, in this country. There are those in the dominate racial group in this country, which controls the majority of wealth, jobs, and positions of power, who view those who are not part of it as a threat to it. It's just how it is, how it has always been.

You cannot blame people for being successful as if everyone who is successful do so at the determinant of others. Race may have been a factor for many people starting from a lower class today due to past injustices but should never be the focus today as it is an antiquated factor. I would go as far to say that there will always be disparities that could be grouped by race because people will never be equal as we are all individuals and all with unique experiences and there are many ways people can group others to reach their desired result. Considering the majority of Americans came here after the slave trade to escape their own instances of oppression, some more vile then others, also started in a very low class and suffered from similar racial bias. I am thankful we corrected those wrongs and do not wish to repeat it.

It has nothing to do with punishing people who are successful, it's about some punishing people for not being part of their own race, or culture, to protect those things. This has led to such such racial disparities in the country, like where 25% of the black population has been incarcerated at some point in their lives, compared to 10% for the white population - with apologists claiming that Blacks are just more criminal minded or lazy (which are pretty racist). The racial disparity in wealth is not much better, so one racial group having more money will often tend to determine tjeir success over another, while those born into poverty often have criminal records that make climbing the social ladder even harder. That is just basic.

At 3/30/22 04:10 PM, EdyKel wrote:

At 3/30/22 03:46 PM, bumbaclad wrote:

At 3/30/22 03:37 PM, EdyKel wrote:

At 3/30/22 03:21 PM, bumbaclad wrote:

At 3/30/22 12:26 PM, TecNoir wrote:

At 3/30/22 11:43 AM, bumbaclad wrote:

At 3/30/22 10:39 AM, TecNoir wrote:

At 3/30/22 08:00 AM, bumbaclad wrote:

At 3/29/22 08:24 PM, EdyKel wrote:

As if the color of someones skin determines their experience in this world and warrants any assumptions by others; racist line of thinking. Wake up.

To claim that skin color has no bearing on people's experiences is simply a denial of facts. You think skin color had no bearing 100 years ago? You think the aftermath of the civil rights movement ended racism?

Bloomberg: Job Applicants With ‘Black Names’ Still Less Likely to Get Interviews (2021)

As if Bloomberg is a trustworthy source of information and I did not say skin color had no bearing, case in point the post I was replying to using skin color as a defining characteristic, so stop trying to spread disinformation.

disinformation

Did you read the article? Would you like me to find the studies for you? Do you have any actual criticism of the content of the article?

Where to start? The fact they did not site the study for us to reference or the fact that it is twenty years old by their own account? Yes, I would need to review the study to see how accurate it is and if it even holds merit on the subject and if the data was peer reviewed by a non-partial party. They only first reference that study prior to referencing some guys local survey which it appears this claim was made from so I don't trust a word of that article.

So likely that article is disinformation but my disinformation accusation was due to your inference of what I said as if it is more accurate then my own words; an attempt at changing my statement into some fictional unreasonable binary.

I noticed that your not posting any sources to counter it, which most likely means you can't defend your own claims against the mountain of statistics, and studies, against it, that you can find anywhere. So, at this point, you are the one promoting misinformation. No amount of projections, and deflection, on your part will change that.

Sources of what? I wasent the one linking nonsense articles. Why would I bother searching for or even believe there are studies countering some random false narrative?

You are trying to descrid it, right? Just saying you have truth on your side don't mean shit when you can't support a rebuttal to your opponents claim with a valid source. It just makes you look like you are the one peddling misinformation.

At 3/30/22 06:35 PM, bumbaclad wrote:

At 3/30/22 04:07 PM, EdyKel wrote:

At 3/30/22 03:45 PM, bumbaclad wrote:

At 3/30/22 11:57 AM, EdyKel wrote:

At 3/30/22 08:00 AM, bumbaclad wrote:

At 3/29/22 08:24 PM, EdyKel wrote:

As if the color of someones skin determines their experience in this world and warrants any assumptions by others; racist line of thinking. Wake up.

Well, with people saying "Just say you want whites to go extinct." over the most non-offensive comment, It would explain why there are still huge racial disparities to this day in incarceration rates, wealth, and representation, in this country. There are those in the dominate racial group in this country, which controls the majority of wealth, jobs, and positions of power, who view those who are not part of it as a threat to it. It's just how it is, how it has always been.

You cannot blame people for being successful as if everyone who is successful do so at the determinant of others. Race may have been a factor for many people starting from a lower class today due to past injustices but should never be the focus today as it is an antiquated factor. I would go as far to say that there will always be disparities that could be grouped by race because people will never be equal as we are all individuals and all with unique experiences and there are many ways people can group others to reach their desired result. Considering the majority of Americans came here after the slave trade to escape their own instances of oppression, some more vile then others, also started in a very low class and suffered from similar racial bias. I am thankful we corrected those wrongs and do not wish to repeat it.

It has nothing to do with punishing people who are successful, it's about some punishing people for not being part of their own race, or culture, to protect those things. This has led to such such racial disparities in the country, like where 25% of the black population has been incarcerated at some point in their lives, compared to 10% for the white population - with apologists claiming that Blacks are just more criminal minded or lazy (which are pretty racist). The racial disparity in wealth is not much better, so one racial group having more money will often tend to determine tjeir success over another, while those born into poverty often have criminal records that make climbing the social ladder even harder. That is just basic.

The statistics you are using are racist and that is why you arguing with awful ideas like that black people are 'criminal minded'; don't recall reading that here but I may have missed it. Why group people by race when region would make much more sense and not be in and of itself racist. As if a person from NY shares the same experience as a person from LA, or WI, or the next town over the bridge, just because they match next to some paint swabs?

At 3/30/22 03:21 PM, bumbaclad wrote:

At 3/30/22 12:26 PM, TecNoir wrote:

At 3/30/22 11:43 AM, bumbaclad wrote:

At 3/30/22 10:39 AM, TecNoir wrote:

At 3/30/22 08:00 AM, bumbaclad wrote:

At 3/29/22 08:24 PM, EdyKel wrote:

As if the color of someones skin determines their experience in this world and warrants any assumptions by others; racist line of thinking. Wake up.

To claim that skin color has no bearing on people's experiences is simply a denial of facts. You think skin color had no bearing 100 years ago? You think the aftermath of the civil rights movement ended racism?

Bloomberg: Job Applicants With ‘Black Names’ Still Less Likely to Get Interviews (2021)

As if Bloomberg is a trustworthy source of information and I did not say skin color had no bearing, case in point the post I was replying to using skin color as a defining characteristic, so stop trying to spread disinformation.

disinformation

Did you read the article? Would you like me to find the studies for you? Do you have any actual criticism of the content of the article?

Where to start? The fact they did not site the study for us to reference or the fact that it is twenty years old by their own account? Yes, I would need to review the study to see how accurate it is and if it even holds merit on the subject and if the data was peer reviewed by a non-partial party. They only first reference that study prior to referencing some guys local survey which it appears this claim was made from so I don't trust a word of that article.

So likely that article is disinformation but my disinformation accusation was due to your inference of what I said as if it is more accurate then my own words; an attempt at changing my statement into some fictional unreasonable binary.

At 3/29/22 08:24 PM, EdyKel wrote:

At 3/29/22 07:42 PM, PigLice wrote:

At 3/18/22 05:45 PM, ForgotMyChildhoodAcc wrote: The party that allows these extremists who are bordering on the insane, esoteric/mystical fascist movements of the world should be condemned. The more reasonable Republicans (who DO exist, despite what some might think) have a moral obligation to ditch the party line and finally admit that they aren't much different than many of the neoliberal capitalist Democrats by moving into their ranks. Even if you're not a huge fan of the Democrats (which I'm not,) they should always be chosen and advocated for over the lunatics and those who are willing to support the lunatics. Maintaining your Republican identity is empowering this ascendant force that would take our country back centuries.

Just say you want whites to go extinct. Simpler.

Yeah, lets' stop with that line of thought, right there. Whites aren't victims, not even a little. People who bring up this right-wing talking point just want to play the victim with claims of reverse racism, with little to show for it, all to ignore the current racial disparities in the country.

At 4/5/22 07:40 AM, FireWaffle wrote: Reading about privilege made me think about all the times I was called that while growing up.

I was called privileged because both my parents were alive and so I couldn’t apply for a scholarship for a private school, despite meeting all the grade and financial requirements.

I was called privileged because I could run faster than anyone else in my has class, because I was the only one who didn’t smoke.

I was called privileged because I had a shitty car by the time I was 18, that I bought with the money I saved when I started working when I was 14, while I was going to school, and I woke up at 5 for my paper route before school.

I was called privileged because I had a job as soon as I was out of high school and started university, while everyone else struggled because they didn’t do all the extra activities I did, because those were for nerds and losers.

I was called privileged because I went to an university, despite them being free in Europe and accessible to everyone, because I was “too smart” and that was probably because I had an easy life and went to those private schools that rejected me on the thesis that I had two parents.

I was called privileged, lucky, “probably sold his ass” when I bought a Tesla at age 23.

And now I’m called privileged, because I’m white, and all the hard work I did to get here doesn’t matter.

At 4/5/22 09:26 AM, FireWaffle wrote:

At 4/5/22 09:22 AM, TurkeyOnAStick wrote:

At 4/5/22 07:40 AM, FireWaffle wrote: Reading about privilege made me think about all the times I was called that while growing up.

I was called privileged because both my parents were alive and so I couldn’t apply for a scholarship for a private school, despite meeting all the grade and financial requirements.

I was called privileged because I could run faster than anyone else in my has class, because I was the only one who didn’t smoke.

I was called privileged because I had a shitty car by the time I was 18, that I bought with the money I saved when I started working when I was 14, while I was going to school, and I woke up at 5 for my paper route before school.

I was called privileged because I had a job as soon as I was out of high school and started university, while everyone else struggled because they didn’t do all the extra activities I did, because those were for nerds and losers.

I was called privileged because I went to an university, despite them being free in Europe and accessible to everyone, because I was “too smart” and that was probably because I had an easy life and went to those private schools that rejected me on the thesis that I had two parents.

I was called privileged, lucky, “probably sold his ass” when I bought a Tesla at age 23.

And now I’m called privileged, because I’m white, and all the hard work I did to get here doesn’t matter.

Did you mean to make this post in this thread?

The only interactions you’ve had in this thread are here, and as far as I can ascertain nobody called you “privileged”.

Since this topic is about Republicans, the shift in topic to being referred to as “privileged” from someone who’s not American is a bit outta leftfield for me, so I don’t understand why it’s been brought up.

People have been talking about privilege for a little bit here, so I thought I'd add something to the discussion, considering how "white privilege" has been a cornerstone of the american left for a good decade now.

At 4/5/22 09:34 AM, FireWaffle wrote:

At 4/5/22 09:29 AM, TurkeyOnAStick wrote:

At 4/5/22 09:26 AM, FireWaffle wrote:

At 4/5/22 09:22 AM, TurkeyOnAStick wrote:

At 4/5/22 07:40 AM, FireWaffle wrote: Reading about privilege made me think about all the times I was called that while growing up.

I was called privileged because both my parents were alive and so I couldn’t apply for a scholarship for a private school, despite meeting all the grade and financial requirements.

I was called privileged because I could run faster than anyone else in my has class, because I was the only one who didn’t smoke.

I was called privileged because I had a shitty car by the time I was 18, that I bought with the money I saved when I started working when I was 14, while I was going to school, and I woke up at 5 for my paper route before school.

I was called privileged because I had a job as soon as I was out of high school and started university, while everyone else struggled because they didn’t do all the extra activities I did, because those were for nerds and losers.

I was called privileged because I went to an university, despite them being free in Europe and accessible to everyone, because I was “too smart” and that was probably because I had an easy life and went to those private schools that rejected me on the thesis that I had two parents.

I was called privileged, lucky, “probably sold his ass” when I bought a Tesla at age 23.

And now I’m called privileged, because I’m white, and all the hard work I did to get here doesn’t matter.

Did you mean to make this post in this thread?

The only interactions you’ve had in this thread are here, and as far as I can ascertain nobody called you “privileged”.

Since this topic is about Republicans, the shift in topic to being referred to as “privileged” from someone who’s not American is a bit outta leftfield for me, so I don’t understand why it’s been brought up.

People have been talking about privilege for a little bit here, so I thought I'd add something to the discussion, considering how "white privilege" has been a cornerstone of the american left for a good decade now.

Would you mind providing a link or a quote?

I did a word search for “privilege” and I can’t find anything in this thread (which was made January 27 2022), so I think I want to see what you’re referring.

There were talks about whites being victims and how they aren't, making a broad generalization of more than a billion of people. This, as I have already said, has been an important point for the american left for a long time, claiming that "whites can't be victims" and so on, with the only basis of that being that "the wrong side says it". I'm against many things the american right says, but this blatant attempt to turn people against eachother by the american left is sickening.

At 3/19/22 10:39 AM, TecNoir wrote:

At 3/18/22 12:12 PM, TecNoir wrote:

At 3/17/22 05:28 AM, GenericDungeonSlime wrote: He also kept Putin contained with no new aggressive acts during his time, which means something considering that both attacks on Ukraine happened before and after his tenure.

NBC: Russia attacks, seizes Ukrainian vessels in Black Sea off Crimea (2018)

Your thoughts on this?

Crickets I guess.

Anyways are we witnessing the unmasking of a pro-Russian shill?

At 4/5/22 01:05 PM, TurkeyOnAStick wrote:

At 4/5/22 12:46 PM, GenericDungeonSlime wrote:
You are entirely right to bring it up and calling it "privilege" was a perfectly fine way to put what was being said. Some people here are simply very dishonest.

What is “dishonest” about it?

Nobody is discussing white privilege.

At 4/5/22 01:05 PM, TurkeyOnAStick wrote:

At 4/5/22 12:46 PM, GenericDungeonSlime wrote:
You are entirely right to bring it up and calling it "privilege" was a perfectly fine way to put what was being said. Some people here are simply very dishonest.

What is “dishonest” about it?

Nobody is discussing white privilege.