What if this whole contest was a joke..............like i giant rule 10!!!
-shivers-
ohthe horror!
What if this whole contest was a joke..............like i giant rule 10!!!
-shivers-
ohthe horror!
At 12/4/07 05:08 PM, DoobyTimePiece wrote: What if this whole contest was a joke..............like i giant rule 10!!!
ahahahahah if so, i'd never stop obeying rule #10 XD
I'd cry. I'd also film it so I could put it through the flash portal. Who knows, maybe i'd get under dog of the week.
Is LJC away or something? Or are you guys just stumped as to a final top 5 for each genre?
I think we deserve something resembling an explanation...
At 12/4/07 06:25 PM, RigAudio wrote: Is LJC away or something? Or are you guys just stumped as to a final top 5 for each genre?
I think we deserve something resembling an explanation...
I have to agree. You're killing us here.
At 12/4/07 06:25 PM, RigAudio wrote: Is LJC away or something? Or are you guys just stumped as to a final top 5 for each genre?
I think we deserve something resembling an explanation...
remind me rig, when i host another DAC, to make you the judge again, i have a feeling, you will do me well again
at least our rusults were in on the 3rd day LJ so :P ;)
At 12/4/07 06:38 PM, DoobyTimePiece wrote:At 12/4/07 06:25 PM, RigAudio wrote: Is LJC away or something? Or are you guys just stumped as to a final top 5 for each genre?remind me rig, when i host another DAC, to make you the judge again, i have a feeling, you will do me well again
I think we deserve something resembling an explanation...
Sure thing!
sigh...
At 12/4/07 06:38 PM, DoobyTimePiece wrote:At 12/4/07 06:25 PM, RigAudio wrote: Is LJC away or something? Or are you guys just stumped as to a final top 5 for each genre?remind me rig, when i host another DAC, to make you the judge again, i have a feeling, you will do me well again
I think we deserve something resembling an explanation...
at least our rusults were in on the 3rd day LJ so :P ;)
I'm somewhat new to these audio portal contests.. what exactly is a DAC? Daily audio contest.. ?
Deadliest audio composer? Just kidding.
At 12/4/07 06:25 PM, RigAudio wrote: Is LJC away or something? Or are you guys just stumped as to a final top 5 for each genre?
Yes - a little of both... Sorry guys, I've been very busy since the beginning of last week and in addition, there is a much smaller group of judges this time. Right now, we're at the point where we are trying to figure out the final order and declare winners.
I know the timing is bad and you all deserve a set of results as fast as we can get them to you. Please be just a little bit more patient - I'm hoping we can get the winners posted in a day or two...
Also - there's a new MAC ready that should have started yesterday but there's a small delay on that as well. Look for it soon.
IF ANYONE OUT THERE wants to go through the posted list and pick a top 5 from each genre, feel free to do that and PM me with your results - we could always use another perspective on the entries.
At 12/4/07 07:30 PM, LJCoffee wrote: IF ANYONE OUT THERE wants to go through the posted list and pick a top 5 from each genre, feel free to do that and PM me with your results - we could always use another perspective on the entries.
I'll give it a go! Everyone else should as well >:(
At 12/4/07 08:22 PM, HotActionYiffFur wrote:At 12/4/07 08:05 PM, RigAudio wrote:You're telling contest participants to vote on their stuff as well as everyone else's?At 12/4/07 07:30 PM, LJCoffee wrote: IF ANYONE OUT THERE wants to go through the posted list and pick a top 5 from each genre, feel free to do that and PM me with your results - we could always use another perspective on the entries.I'll give it a go! Everyone else should as well >:(
Seems a bit sketchy to me.
i agree i dont think u should appeal to the opinions of those who are participating in the actual competition aspect of this contest.
..or did u mean something else?
just take ur time and have good results ready
At 12/4/07 08:27 PM, Winterwind-NS wrote:At 12/4/07 08:22 PM, HotActionYiffFur wrote: You're telling contest participants to vote on their stuff as well as everyone else's?i agree i dont think u should appeal to the opinions of those who are participating in the actual competition aspect of this contest.
Seems a bit sketchy to me.
It doesn't matter that I entered the contest - LJC's asking for our opinions of the entries. I haven't listened to all the songs yet, but whenever I find one that's better than mine, I rank it appropriately. I'm impartial as impartial can be, and I think that the judges will nevertheless keep in mind the fact that I entered this contest when looking at my own top 5s.
I agree with Winterwind and HAYF, just take your time LJ. Anyone who is getting too impatient needs to get more of a life if you have to look forward to is MAC result.
At 12/4/07 09:07 PM, 0con wrote: I agree with Winterwind and HAYF, just take your time LJ. Anyone who is getting too impatient needs to get more of a life if you have to look forward to is MAC result.
I agree on this opinion! Take your time, judges. Take your time.
At 12/4/07 10:55 PM, Masterwabbit wrote: Take your time, judges. Take your time.
I just put that out there... Of course, anyone can always express their opinions on any or all of the entries but yes, you are all correct - contestants shouldn't be judging.
Sorry if I caused any confusion - let me rephrase it.
If you did not sumit a song for this MAC and you would like to help out a little, then please feel free to listen to the entries and PM your suggestions for the top 5 songs in each category. :)
I know we're still waiting for the results of this one but I'll probably be posting the new MAC very soon.
At 12/4/07 11:14 PM, LJCoffee wrote: I just put that out there... Of course, anyone can always express their opinions on any or all of the entries but yes, you are all correct - contestants shouldn't be judging.
Oh. Whoopsie.
At 12/4/07 11:14 PM, LJCoffee wrote: I know we're still waiting for the results of this one but I'll probably be posting the new MAC very soon.
See, this is what happens when you don't have Solus cracking the whip behind the scenes. I don't work this MAC and you let it all fall to shit.
You guys suck, and now I'ma have to bail you out. :D
At 12/5/07 07:03 PM, loogiesquared wrote: so, when can we expect a deadline for the winners??
No clue.
What did that pic have to do with anything?
At 12/5/07 07:06 PM, RigAudio wrote:At 12/5/07 07:03 PM, loogiesquared wrote: so, when can we expect a deadline for the winners??No clue.
What did that pic have to do with anything?
lol. I agree. I'm scratching my head. This isn't the advertisements thread.
it was a wrong pic, it was supposed to be a panda saying "TELL ME, BETcH!"...but sorry
At 12/5/07 07:18 PM, loogiesquared wrote: it was a wrong pic, it was supposed to be a panda saying "TELL ME, BETcH!"...but sorry
Rule 10
bah
I want some muffins...
At 12/5/07 07:22 PM, RigAudio wrote:At 12/5/07 07:18 PM, loogiesquared wrote: it was a wrong pic, it was supposed to be a panda saying "TELL ME, BETcH!"...but sorryRule 10
bah
I want some muffins...
so, it that a "Lol"?
At 12/5/07 07:23 PM, loogiesquared wrote:At 12/5/07 07:22 PM, RigAudio wrote:so, it that a "Lol"?At 12/5/07 07:18 PM, loogiesquared wrote: it was a wrong pic, it was supposed to be a panda saying "TELL ME, BETcH!"...but sorryRule 10
bah
I want some muffins...
always.
At 12/5/07 07:18 PM, loogiesquared wrote: it was a wrong pic, it was supposed to be a panda saying "TELL ME, BETcH!"...but sorry
Now tell me how you managed to confuse a screenshot of a song's stats and a picture of a drunk panda??
At 12/6/07 10:55 AM, SBB wrote:At 12/5/07 07:18 PM, loogiesquared wrote: it was a wrong pic, it was supposed to be a panda saying "TELL ME, BETcH!"...but sorryNow tell me how you managed to confuse a screenshot of a song's stats and a picture of a drunk panda??
Lol, he voted on his own song.
I mean, who does THAT
REALLY
10
I hate being an impatient bastard.
*starts chanting "Results! Results!"*
Yeah...it's starting to get a little ridiculous here...a new macs started up already. I understand it takes some time to listen to all the submissions but we shouldn't be the ones to pay if one of the judges promised to commit time they never had. There should be a judging deadline rule that's as solid as the submissions deadline rule.
At 12/6/07 01:41 PM, Quarl wrote: Yeah...it's starting to get a little ridiculous here...There should be a judging deadline rule that's as solid as the submissions deadline rule.
I agree to an extent - and I'll post the results as soon as I can - possibly later today/tonight.
As far as a judging deadline goes - if you don't get a submission in on time then the only thing that happens is you don't get to compete - but what should happen if the judges don't get their work done on time?
If the judges don't complete their work by a judging deadline then there are still no results to post, deadline or not.
Any ideas? If you have any then PLEASE!, I beg you, let me know.
Well, how many judges are there? If a judge didn't make a deadline then maybe they should be dropped from the judging. It's not really fair seeing as how votes would get lost, but it's also not too fair keeping so many people waiting like this. I mean, if there's only 5 judges then I'd reconsider asking for a deadline, but if theres at least 10 maybe then it's slightly different. Dunno, it's just a thought. In any case I think I might be a judge in the next comp. I don't think i'd have as much fun making nes chip tunes as I would have listening to the better submissions.
It's great though to hear that the results will be out soon :D