Crusher117 is right, we have to let it be up to the individuals' choice to blam, but we have to have the judgment, as I said before, to make the right vote regarding spam submissions.
I propose we "spam-profile" users. Look at people like Snaws before all of his work got deleted. He had, what, 52 spam submissions in a matter of two months? Look in the spammer-in-questions' flash submission history. If they all got titles like "FUCK YOU N***ER!" and "DD are Faggots" or the likes, what do you think they make?
Once again, this is in no way mass-voting, as barely any of us seem to be online at the same time to coordinate one in the first place. Use common sense when viewing flashes in the Flash Portal, and obviously check back every once and a while for the Flagship Spam which are proudly emblazoned in brackets.
To me, those are like turkey shoots...but they still somehow pass anyway.
If we can bundle up, and put all of those blam/protect points to use, make it more of a head-hunting game....every man for them self can try to down spam on their own. No coordination. No alert. Just act. Do this "by the book"
If it's just a crappy sprite flash, or a lame short animation, we kind of have a sort-of moral obligation to drop a review on how they can make it better. We have time...it's not like those Under Judgment flashes shuffle along quickly.
But if it's hateful, obscene, effortless, repetitive spam? Something that you know beyond a shadow of a doubt does not belong on the portal?
Simply, Act.