At 4/26/05 12:15 AM, _IAMCanadian_ wrote:At 4/25/05 11:58 PM, ddrmasterman wrote: I think one of the largest problems for us portal addicts is all of the mass voting going on.I'm sorry, what mass voting is this?
I'm not gonna answer this one yet.
If your not sure what that is, this ...what a disgrace... passed just a few minutes before I passed it.That's becuase people are point whores. They see that the author has a lot of flash already in the portal and vote high without watching it. No mass voting there.
ok, then we need to fix that! Shouldn't be a huge hassle
I'm sure many of you are familiar with the clock crew? Yeah, well their 90% of the problem at least.The original Clock Crew is dead. There are pretty much nothing but poser-clocks left.
ok, then we can get rid of them (see idea #2)
I have two ways of fixing thisIt would be too much hassle to have at least 1 person on 24/7, and it would lead to abuse of the system. If the user doesn't like some movies, even if they are good, they could just delete whatever they want.
1. Have 1+ staff members with High authority browsing the portal 24/7. That way when something like that comes along, they can delete it.
I think Tom is smart enough to find somebody that wouldn't abuse the privlage, we aren't all kids.
2. If we don't have the man power for something like that, we could make a temporary solution by leting the server handle it by banning and prohibiting the use of the word clock in usernames. It's a little drastic, but it would fix the problem until we can figure out something else to do.I'm sorry, but this is just plain stupid. Like I already mentioned, there are almost no real clocks left on Newgrounds. All there is are posers and they are a vast minority among users. This is also not going to do anything, people can change their name.
I know people can change their name, but my theory is that they might get discouraged from all of their 'hard work' and then gettting banned, and then just give up. ...new idea... perhaps we could have at least one person on 24/7 (like solution #1) but instead of deleting the flash they can suspend the person who submitted the flash according to how many times they have submitted junk to newgrounds (1 day for first offense, 5 for second, etc.)
Please let me know what you all think.Personally, I don't think that there is any mass voting whatsoever going on. My theory is that people hear rumors of certain groups doing it, and when those groups submit flash, they vote high because they think that it will pass for sure due to the "mass voting". I think that enough people do this that it ends up getting a high score and passing. So, I guess in a way it is mass voting, just that the people who do it are unaware that they are the actual perpetrators.
If this is true then we need to get the word out and tell people to stop. A post on the front page or a pop-up on the portal page (only for 1 or 2 days, we don't need to read it every time we logon) should fix it. Thanks for the critism, but I still stand firmly behind my ideas.