Reviews for Lolcat History (Part 2/6)

[Kwing]

Awesome

I saw these when they first came out and actually helped them pass judgment, but coming back to it I realized these deserve reviews! The graphics are nice, but some parts of animation are great while some suck (like the walking animation). It's really weird how some parts are great and some aren't. The humor is great and the voice acting is spot-on... Well sort of. Sometimes it seemed like the voice actors were focusing more on their accent than making the word structure and diction sound realistic. Way funnier than the first one, though. Way to go!

jiggitysmith responds:

Lol yes. It's definitely flawed but has some sort of simple charm to it that's also pretty stupid. I must have had the worst sense of humor as a kid.

[gunslingergrass]

"Yeah, i know...

im headcat. douchebag." haha love it!

[EBcondensate]

These just get better'n better

Lol

[cATbYtE]

pretty interesting

that was good. Head Cat sounds like Meatwad from ATHF on adult swim.

[Jaller333]

An invisible bike, a floating cat head, and staffs

WHAT NEXT?!!?

I'll tell you what! MORE LOLCATS!!! Anyway, this was better, and more random than the first. I mean, talking cats is one thing, but jumbling them up into THIS..is entirely different. Anyway, the animation is pretty much the same as Part 1. And of course the "artwork" is.

The humor is a little better. More randomness and cussing. For some reason I find it funny when someone cusses in this. Anyway, this is pretty much the same score as Part 1.