Pointless.
The utter pointlessness of the movie led to its score. It was violent for the sake of being violent – and hiding under the false pretences of a coherent story.
I watched both and found them both to be pointlessly violent and senseless.
Even Hannibal Lecter had a reason for killing people.
more scarier than the last one
man,the serial killer doesn't deserve god!But what does the sharp F sign,sharp B sign,and the sharp T sign mean?good movie,but should be banned for exsessive blood and gore,plus violence.
entertainment in exploitation?
this movie,
did absolutely nothing for me.
I am a great fan of the exploitation picture, but to create a good exploitation picture there must be at least a small message being conveyed and most of all a sense of fun amongst chaos,
people watch flash movies to relive stress and to be entertained.
and not have it compounded.
you have here a compilation of disturbing imagery all portrayed in the dark.
anyone could really produce a series of violent pictures, but none of it makes alot of sense.
we know nothing about the killer, and here he enters a church and kills two people,
why?
this lack of motivation makes the movie uninteresting and naught but a sense of confusion and sickness,
a guy killing a priest and a nun,
whoo,
'_'
this is evil. to voilent,
um what...? that was just gore... and he knife rapped a nun!?!? yeah not all of us have had good experiences with them, but what sick and twisted mind you have to do that... I was hopping for a good physiological horror, but you made me want to throw up... like I had to look away for a sec. I wasn't scared I just found it really un-tasteful, and to the point of fetishistic torture.