At 11/28/08 02:28 PM, HeavyTank wrote:

At 11/28/08 11:54 AM, sirtom93 wrote: Evidently just a threat - check Malachy's post

well a ban threat by a mod usually ends in a real ban...l don't think that any mod will tell you that he will ban you just for the sake of laughing at someone else's expense...

Hmm yeah, I guess the other person did get banned. Mods are douche bags though.

At 11/28/08 03:55 PM, sirtom93 wrote: Hmm yeah, I guess the other person did get banned. Mods are douche bags though.

Not all of them...l posted in an old thread once (l didn't know it was old) and it was considered bumping, so l could even get perma-banned for that, but luckily the mod was very nice to me and she even THANKED me for "being so comprehensive"!
So she just warned me, deleted my post and that's it..IMO that is the correct way to treat "law offenders" on Newgrounds, not just "OMFG YOU STUPID ASSHOLE NOW YOU'RE GONNA GET PERMA BANN'D LOLN00B"

I cant remember any mods being that much of a douche. Theyre usually pretty fair, but some warnings would be nice aswell.

At 11/29/08 10:20 AM, DasUberCow wrote: I cant remember any mods being that much of a douche. Theyre usually pretty fair, but some warnings would be nice aswell.

NEVR and Eyelovepoozy in my opinion are some of the worst mods.

At 11/29/08 11:52 AM, sirtom93 wrote:

At 11/29/08 10:20 AM, DasUberCow wrote: I cant remember any mods being that much of a douche. Theyre usually pretty fair, but some warnings would be nice aswell.

NEVR and Eyelovepoozy in my opinion are some of the worst mods.

Shhh, the walls have ears.

At 11/29/08 02:07 PM, SgtDK wrote:

At 11/29/08 11:52 AM, sirtom93 wrote:

At 11/29/08 10:20 AM, DasUberCow wrote: I cant remember any mods being that much of a douche. Theyre usually pretty fair, but some warnings would be nice aswell.

NEVR and Eyelovepoozy in my opinion are some of the worst mods.

Shhh, the walls have ears.

I don't care. Mods think they can do whatever they want and will have no questioning to their corrupt rules, if they ban me it will only show how corrupt the rules are that they have to hide people questioning them,

At 11/29/08 03:11 PM, sirtom93 wrote: I don't care. Mods think they can do whatever they want and will have no questioning to their corrupt rules, if they ban me it will only show how corrupt the rules are that they have to hide people questioning them,

this reminds me alot of europe under german rule during WWII...no, seriously, think about it for a second..that, and the fact that Bananabreadmuffin actually calls himself a Nazi mod (and to think that l have added him as a "Spore buddy" in Spore..) contribute to the feeling..but, as long as you are careful enough, you can avoid bans..but if you get locked on by a nazi mod, then, well ,it's over...

Calling himself a Nazi mod makes him a huge douche bag. Nazism is pure evil and while everyone thinks of saying Nazi on the internet as satire, I dislike it.

At 11/29/08 04:15 PM, sirtom93 wrote: Calling himself a Nazi mod makes him a huge douche bag. Nazism is pure evil and while everyone thinks of saying Nazi on the internet as satire, I dislike it.

The thing is, this is a semi-satire because he has a really bad reputation when it comes to being a comprehensive, nice mod..

At 11/30/08 04:10 AM, HeavyTank wrote:

At 11/29/08 04:15 PM, sirtom93 wrote: Calling himself a Nazi mod makes him a huge douche bag. Nazism is pure evil and while everyone thinks of saying Nazi on the internet as satire, I dislike it.

The thing is, this is a semi-satire because he has a really bad reputation when it comes to being a comprehensive, nice mod..

True. If any of you remember Redcircle you would know how good a mod he was :3

At 11/30/08 07:49 AM, sirtom93 wrote:
True. If any of you remember Redcircle you would know how good a mod he was :3

was?what happened to him?He died because he was a good mod among bad ones?

Why not spartan army?

At 11/30/08 02:39 PM, kornrox wrote: Why not spartan army?

Because the Spartans lost.

Badly.

At 11/30/08 02:52 PM, DeathNoteetoNhtaeD wrote:

At 11/30/08 02:39 PM, kornrox wrote: Why not spartan army?

Because the Spartans lost.

Badly.

Hell, everyone's kicked some Greek ass at one time or another.

At 11/30/08 03:26 PM, Centurion-Ryan wrote:

At 11/30/08 02:52 PM, DeathNoteetoNhtaeD wrote:

At 11/30/08 02:39 PM, kornrox wrote: Why not spartan army?

Because the Spartans lost.

Badly.

Hell, everyone's kicked some Greek ass at one time or another.

Yeah. Turks, Romans, Athenians, Persians, you name it.

Spartans. The perennial losers. Not to be mean or anything.

At 11/30/08 03:31 PM, DeathNoteetoNhtaeD wrote:

At 11/30/08 03:26 PM, Centurion-Ryan wrote:

At 11/30/08 02:52 PM, DeathNoteetoNhtaeD wrote:

At 11/30/08 02:39 PM, kornrox wrote: Why not spartan army?

Because the Spartans lost.

Badly.

Hell, everyone's kicked some Greek ass at one time or another.

Yeah. Turks, Romans, Athenians, Persians, you name it.

Spartans. The perennial losers. Not to be mean or anything.

Hell, despite being technologically inferior to the point of ridiculousness, even we Celts owned them on a number of occassions.

At least in terms of bravery.

Remember kiddies, losing is alright as long as when you get stabbed by the enemy, you tear the spear out of your body and run them through with it.

Hell, despite being technologically inferior to the point of ridiculousness

I quote that for awesomeness.

At 11/30/08 04:17 PM, sirtom93 wrote:

Hell, despite being technologically inferior to the point of ridiculousness

I quote that for awesomeness.

Seriously, they had fucking ships and bows and artillery and shit.

By comparison, we had rocks and sticks.

Well, slings and spears.

And don't even get me started on the fucking Romans.

I don't get how that particular quote is awesome, though.

I don't get how that particular quote is awesome, though.

Neither do I. However, the fact the Greeks were owned by such a wide array of empires shows just how long they lasted and how effective they were.

At 11/30/08 04:28 PM, sirtom93 wrote:

I don't get how that particular quote is awesome, though.

Neither do I. However, the fact the Greeks were owned by such a wide array of empires shows just how long they lasted and how effective they were.

Well, in their defence, Greece was basically a collection of constantly warring states which...

Oh wait.

So was just about everyone else at that time period.

They did have their moments.

Although most of those moments were in battles between Greeks and other Greeks.

hey everyone, sorry i was gone so long.

i was banned, then i forgot about my Vikings brothers. sorry.

At 11/30/08 03:26 PM, Centurion-Ryan wrote: Hell, everyone's kicked some Greek ass at one time or another.

Hey, watch your language!

At 12/1/08 04:10 AM, homor wrote: hey everyone, sorry i was gone so long.

i was banned, then i forgot about my Vikings brothers. sorry.

Welcome back mr 10'000+ post. Tell me, is there really such a thing as the 10'000+ posts forum, I would doubt it but nice to know.

At 12/1/08 08:07 AM, HeavyTank wrote:

At 11/30/08 03:26 PM, Centurion-Ryan wrote: Hell, everyone's kicked some Greek ass at one time or another.

Hey, watch your language!

I wasn't cursing.

I was merely using the term 'Hell' as short for 'Hellenic'.

As in, 'Greek'.

And 'Ass' reffering to a Donkey.

Therefore the sentence would be:
"Greek, everyone's kicked some Greek donkeys at one time or another."

"Greek, everyone's kicked some Greek donkeys at one time or another."

And that makes perfect sense.

At 12/1/08 12:21 PM, sirtom93 wrote:

"Greek, everyone's kicked some Greek donkeys at one time or another."

And that makes perfect sense.

Oh, I'm sorry, I seem to have misplaced my real response.

Ahem

"People swear on the internet, get over it."

"People swear on the internet, get over it."

People do lots of bad things on the internet :(

In unrelated news, This month I have finnaly placed in the top 2000 most active users. Meaning I can vote on monthly and daily winners, and so I did. Here is who I voted for -

At 12/1/08 01:27 PM, sirtom93 wrote: In unrelated news, This month I have finnaly placed in the top 2000 most active users. Meaning I can vote on monthly and daily winners, and so I did. Here is who I voted for -

Wow congrats. Im sure i wouldve been up there aswell if there werent so many great games out right now!

Wow congrats. Im sure i wouldve been up there aswell if there werent so many great games out right now!

I don't fully understand what you meant by that. The fact you have no flash leads me to believe that you meant being in the top 2000 users, which isn't dependant on how good flash is up there.