At 7/14/08 04:30 PM, Solraczeravla wrote:At 7/14/08 04:20 PM, sonofkirk wrote:Lol that was a good one xDAt 7/14/08 04:17 PM, sonofkirk wrote:At 7/14/08 04:02 PM, AdairTishler wrote:
hehe ! I'm proud of my picture !
This is a peculiar one. His first two reviews are just saying that the flash was only posted on NG to advertise another site, which may be true, but its not against the rules or anything because it was an actual anitmation with a story and crap, not just a flashing "GO TO THIS SITE!". Abusive or no?
http://mikailus.newgrounds.com/reviews/f lash
Your a scientist. Yes, you.
TWITTER: twitter.com/MarkusWolf
At 7/14/08 04:35 PM, AdairTishler wrote:At 7/14/08 04:17 PM, sonofkirk wrote:the review just got removed, so no worriesAt 7/14/08 04:02 PM, AdairTishler wrote: http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /448393Please stop posting the same post. This is at least the 3rd time.
DaSaint
Haha, you are finally rewarded ! lol
http://siris2224.newgrounds.com/reviews/
flash
Would this dudes review for Mastermind 3 be abusive? He said it sucked.
At 7/14/08 04:37 PM, RohantheBarbarian wrote: Got a few more
sandstorm rmx (claims it is stolen)
Super Turbo Diss Track (abuses author), Numa Remix (calls author a retard)
Second link; he reviews "Numa Remix" and calls the author a retard.
At 7/14/08 04:52 PM, stick-man-dude wrote: http://siris2224.newgrounds.com/reviews/
flash
Would this dudes review for Mastermind 3 be abusive? He said it sucked.
No it's not abusive. Your allowed to state your opinion on a flash like he did, but you can't call the author names or anything like that. The review is useless not abusive.
At 7/14/08 04:57 PM, Corky52 wrote:
No it's not abusive. Your allowed to state your opinion on a flash like he did, but you can't call the author names or anything like that. The review is useless not abusive.
Thanks for an answer. I didn't flag it just to play it safe.
http://lanternaq.newgrounds.com/reviews/
flash/1
[KK] DBZ Lesbians, Yu-Gi-Oh!: Duel Club, SF Vs DBZ Budokai: ep2, Mario -V- Blowser: Same reason, Insults the work and the author without constructive criticism.
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/44 8926
Euromaster - just says that he voted zero and the rest is just gibberish.
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/31 9086
Just writes crap.
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /319086/2
mikko007 - writes blam this shit.
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/40 6449
Darkzero234 - informs the author that he is an ***hole and that he sucks d**k, fill in the blanks
Fransinn - just puts an angry faic
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/40 5657
GSXPacker - you'll see when you get ther :3
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /405657/2
Darksluaghter - calls it crow shit and adds unnessary "!"
aquaticmole.
http://nickpoulin49.newgrounds.com/revie ws/flash
Doughguy Bloopers - Just writes exclamation marks = gibberish
Dad's Home - Same reason.
Don't get fooled by the highscores. Those are not reviews.
Shrek Sketches - Just writes question marks = gibberish
Plz give me more abusive reviews.
At 7/14/08 08:28 PM, Hacsev wrote: Plz give me more abusive reviews.
I don't want to be such an asshole but... Why don't you search for some and post them here??
Here are some of my finds, my friends:
http://killbillvolume2.newgrounds.com/re views/audio/1
....Closing In.... : Says it's stolen
Breathing No More: Says it's stolen
Pokemon Sinnoh Pokerap (FULL): EXTREMELY useless review, doesn't offer constructive criticism.
http://calder1.newgrounds.com/reviews/fl ash
Clock theft auto 2, just writes duck eggs. Doesn't make any sence
aquaticmole.
This guy stole the Line Rider game! And called it "Line RIder 2 beta".
Label it as stolen!
Here's a link to the origional!
Reason(s): Text flooding, Nonconstructive.
http://silvaness.newgrounds.com/reviews/
flash
http://djeskaii.newgrounds.com/reviews/f lash/1
I think Silvaness is an old link. Sorry if it turns out you have to sift through his file to find them
GAH!
http://wisewolf20.newgrounds.com/reviews /
All of them:
It's Over Nine-Thousand! - He wrote plenty of exclamation marks = text flooding
[uu] pico day - Insults the author, nonconstructive.
Dad's Home 2 - insults the flash, nonconstructive.
Quick question: Can an author's response to a review be marked as abusive?
The most exciting phrase to hear in science, the one that heralds new discoveries, is not 'Eureka!' (I found it!) but 'That's funny ...'
- Isaac Asimov (1920 - 1992)
At 7/15/08 02:24 AM, rap88 wrote: Quick question: Can an author's response to a review be marked as abusive?
Quick answer: no :)
whoa, i found a whole bunch of these.
At 7/15/08 02:38 AM, IzzyDude wrote:At 7/15/08 02:30 AM, dark101 wrote: whoa, i found a whole bunch of these.I think it's pretty obvious that alt belongs to you. Because the only good reviews were on your submissions.
like 8 of them
lol........ just, lol
At 7/14/08 03:15 AM, pigeonmaster88 wrote:
And how can l know when the mod is SeaMonky and not someone else?You don't know who moderator is when giving points.
This is exactly my point...if we don't know the mod, then why risk it?
The thing is that each user here believes he's right, so some say the don't give points, some say the give negative points etc....we don't know who to believe anymore!
http://frodo5280.newgrounds.com/reviews/
flash
First one says "BLAM"
The most exciting phrase to hear in science, the one that heralds new discoveries, is not 'Eureka!' (I found it!) but 'That's funny ...'
- Isaac Asimov (1920 - 1992)
The most exciting phrase to hear in science, the one that heralds new discoveries, is not 'Eureka!' (I found it!) but 'That's funny ...'
- Isaac Asimov (1920 - 1992)
Watch this guy carefully, seems like he could be one to write more abusive reviews.
The one for ClockCrewUprising Trailer : Blam content.
The one for Rapid Action : Blam blam blam.
The one for Newborn : This deserve to be blammed.
The one for Skater V3: Episode 01 : How did this even get past the portal? ~I'm not sure about this one~
Don't be put off by the 10. It's complete gibberish.
