At 3/21/08 03:00 PM, NEVR wrote:
At 3/21/08 08:06 AM, gfoxcook wrote:
That was as excellently phrased as I've ever seen the "explaining the depositing time vs. rank update time" situation with NG's exp amounts fluctuating -10 / 0 / +10 depending on the times.
Ah gfox, you flatter me. Perhaps this is payback for the excessive gfox-flattery over in the Wi/Ht? Regulars thread...? Must... resist... ego-inflation...
Karmic payback, perhaps, but not intentional on my part, if that's whatcha mean. YOU GETS WHATS COMING TO YAS. #;-}>
Rambly? Dude, if I'd explained that to him, it woulda taken me twice as many lines. #;-}> Bravo, sir.
But you love your extra-detailed essay posts, and we love you for them. Besides, I find it's always kinda difficult to know if you've explained something well enough to someone, so I wasn't sure. :)
Well, sure. But more explanation isn't always better explanation, that's all. #;-}> Different people learn differently, and the best teachers are those that can adapt their messages/lessons to suit ALL of their students, not just try to conform the students to themselves, or to the idealised student mold.
And thus, not everyone would respond well to super-rambly gfox instruction. Yours, OTOH, was just rambly enough to have tons of data without turning off teh "tl;dr" crowd.
Well, at least without turning off many of them. Anyone who woulda said tl;dr to your explanation of this issue... is a moron. #;-}>
On a top 2,000 EXP users note - I'm currently weedling my way further into the top 2,000 - but it's taking a while. I'm currently at #1,746, which is decent enough, I suppose. I guess I'll just focus on attaining some serious B/P, and let teh EXPs slowly compile into something more sizable.
It's a long haul. Aim for the top 1000, YOU CAN DO IT.
At 3/21/08 07:39 PM, ReconRebel wrote:
At 3/19/08 08:30 PM, gfoxcook wrote:
As a public service, I'm going to provide the top... 688 of exp users as of last weekend when I pulled data for the pentalist update.
Why 688 and not 700? Does the number hold some significance for you?
Argh. I really meant to mention why it was 688, because I was just going to post the top 500, but I knew I had info accurately all the way to 688 people.
Why did I know that?
683 - 10,010 - Ryu-Kage
684 - 10,010 - domuandu
685 - 10,001 - Rhete
686 - 10,000 - Nite-Walker
687 - 10,000 - Cyrus-the-Omnipotent
688 - 10,000 - PiePie
Well, as you might guess from the bottom end of the list, 688 is how many people on NG had 10,000+ exp when I did the pentalist update, of course. #;-}>
I made no warranty as to having everyone from 9000 to 10,000 exp, and that's why I cut the list I posted in here at 688/the 10,000 mark exactly.
I'm sure there's probably 700+ people with 10k+ exp now, or if not now, then soon. 690, at least.
This is almost assuredly accurate.
That sounds like a possible maybe.
Definintely maybe, as teh Oasis might say.
If I'm missing anyone, it'd be only 1 or 2 people.
Am I one of those people? **blushes**
THAT'S UNPOSSIBLE. Dude, you've been on the pentalist spreadsheet since 2003. If I was missing you for a 10k+ exp top 688 list posting in 2008.... after that was the case since 2003... then I'd need my head examined. Or else my spreadsheet. #;-}>
061 - 20,170 - ReconRebel
064 - 19,690 - gfoxcook
Ack! Methinks I missed another deposit somewhere. I used to have a 490 point buffer on you Greg. Movement at this level is a rare thing these days. Thanks for the update! :)
I remember it being 500 exactly for a good long time, actually. But yes, the path to a narrowed gap begins with a single lost deposit, as at some point after that period you must have missed to narrow it to 490. And what, now it's 480, eh? Well, not that much narrowed, really. #;-}>
I wouldn't worry about me catching you, unless you were to retire, permanently or temporarily alike.
Now, if you wanted to someday miss 48 deposits so we'd be tied heading into the top 50 exp list, I would really dig that. #;-}>
At 3/22/08 04:35 AM, BR wrote:
Thanks for the update Gfox can cook. I have to agree with others that its great to able to see who in front. Sort of like a never-ending marathon, or a hit list depending on your perspective, heh.
And a hall of fame, to boot!
long live stat whoring
YES! All hail teh stats.
At 3/22/08 04:12 PM, Dream-of-Duke wrote:
I hope that I can get to the top 500 by the end of the semester. It is nice to have 11000+ exp points. :)
Even nicer to hit 20000+ exp, trust me on this one. I'm so close I can taste it. #;-}>