At 5/1/08 10:36 AM, Sir-Nuts wrote:
At 5/1/08 10:27 AM, Bahamut wrote:
14 -- Sir-nuts
Congratulations to Sir-Nuts on becoming the new Wi/Ht? regular for this update! :)
14 votes? Wi/Ht? regular?
I can't believe it! I though I'd get a vote or two and not enter the list, but 14 votes?
That's being modest. ;) Then again, I am a pretty modest person most of the time.
I'm honoured. Thanks a lot to everyone that voted for me. I'll do my best here!
You've done great in April and are doing great this month so far (OK, it's only the 2nd, but whatever).
At 5/1/08 10:50 AM, NEVR wrote:
At 5/1/08 10:27 AM, Bahamut wrote:
I'm surprised that no-one outvoted Major-Punk. Maybe I should have taken him off myself, but I'm just the one who's keeping this list running, not a Wi/Ht? regular. The only ones who should take him off are the regulars or the members voting someone onto the Memberlist.
Hmm... according to my last update of the EGB roster, Major-Punk is still B/Ping. I dunno if that's just the account being used by someone else, or if the whole thing is just some stupid joke. Nevertheless, he's been left on the EGB roster for the time being.
I'm guessing his friend is doing that. I noticed the account has gained EXP since the news post was made, but again, it's probably someone else.
-Bahamut
Nice update, you beast. ;)
Thanks. <3
At 5/1/08 11:02 AM, Haggard wrote:
At 5/1/08 10:30 AM, Bahamut wrote:
Welcome all to the...
May 2008 Update
The Wi/Ht Regulars Update
Thanks for the update, Bahamut! :)
No problem.
#_ | EXP | Revs_ | B/Ps | Posts | Total | Diff_ | Username & Rise/Drop
07 | 10840 | 0479 | 027281 | 06989 | 045589 | 00386 | LittleWashu 2
08 | 10310 | 0903 | 017458 | 01770 | 030441 | 01837 | Haggard 3
A big gap, but if I can't overtake her exp-wise I at least shall overtake LittleWashu on this list! ^^
Maybe you can overtake her EXP-wise someday, just like how I've passed many people that I thought I'd never beat. However, if you do happen to overtake LittleWashu, she'll think it's not such a big deal. ;)
No deposit missed, but review average could be a bit higher..
Don't complain, it was the highest average for reviews. :)
I'll never make it into the top 100 reviewers if I don't speed up a bit. :/
Oh yes, that's true. Even if you've got the highest reviewing average, you still need to enter the flash reviews list.
Thanks! Now on to reaching 30,000 total points on NG log, too. ^^
I suggest Casualty to change that soon. Total points should include audio reviews now. since whenever I make my first pentalist (was thinking of this Sunday, but I won't make one just yet if the site has too many Internal Server Errors), audio reviews will be included.
At 5/1/08 11:36 AM, Auz wrote:
At 5/1/08 10:27 AM, Bahamut wrote:
Congratulations to Sir-Nuts on becoming the new Wi/Ht? regular for this update! :)
Congrats to him. He deffinatly deserved it. Wouldn´t be suprised if he got voted on the memberslist if he keeps going like this.
We'll see how he is by August/September then. :)
But why do you only add one person? We lost 4 members on this update, wouldn´t it be better to add at least two new members? I think we should always add one more person if some people get ascended or voted off.
I was thinking of allowing more than one regular to come on the new list, but I already did that on the last two updates when usually, they would have had one new regular coming in. However, next time we get a Memberlist election, I will allow more then one person to become a new regular. :)
I'm surprised that no-one outvoted Major-Punk. Maybe I should have taken him off myself, but I'm just the one who's keeping this list running, not a Wi/Ht? regular. The only ones who should take him off are the regulars or the members voting someone onto the Memberlist.
Yes, well there are several members of which I think that they should be taken off right now. Major-Punk is one of them, but the two who currently got the out-votes also deserved them imo. Personally I don´t think it would be such a bad idea to have two out-votes for the next update.
That's a great idea. Usually, I won't allow this, but I think it's necessary for once considering the amount of inactive users on the list who were more active two years ago. On the list, I can name three users who are very very inactive and two users who are probably not active enough in this forum.
Next election, all regulars will be allowed to outvote up to two users!
At 5/1/08 07:41 PM, Perceptor wrote:
I must confess that I am somewhat surprised to see that I managed to get 4 nominations for this list myself despite the fact that I am by no means the most active member of this forum.
You shouldn't be surprised. You've made a great contribution to the forums over the last month or two. :)
At 5/1/08 09:15 PM, Basspro55 wrote:
Eh I think I should be nominated
Eh I think the regulars should decide on that one. :P
At 5/1/08 11:29 PM, gfoxcook wrote:
At 4/29/08 06:07 PM, Bahamut wrote:
I'm guessing Bank holiday in May isn't something you get. :(
Memorial Day is a bank holiday every May...
Oh ok.
At 5/1/08 10:30 AM, Bahamut wrote:
Woot woot woot! Thanks for the update, Bahaman.
Can you please stop calling me Bahaman or Bahamen as I keep reading it as? Man = Human. :(
At 5/2/08 11:18 AM, NEVR wrote:
500 review deletions would be crrrrazy.
Not really. I remember one user getting all 200+ of his reviews deleted for saying the exact same thing. Those 200 flagged and deleted reviews gave me some nice whistle points, even though I was already a Deity whistle user at the time. However, I wasn't flagging them to get more whistle points. I simply flagged them all because they were abusive reviews. Also, there IS a rule saying this:
Do not post TONS and TONS of crappy reviews just to get high in the rankings. If we catch someone doing this we will delete all their reviews - wouldn't that be a pain in the ass? Take your time and write a sincere review for every movie you wish to critique. Make sure your review is relative to the submission. Reviews that are found to offer no benefit to the author may be deleted.