At 6/1/08 10:42 AM, smc316 wrote:
Animation wise and graphics wise no, but at least i'd find some way to make my bloody flash funny or entertaining.
I, along with hundreds of other people do find the Brackenwood series entertaining.
As long as graphics are some what good, who cares about them? It can have the best graphics and best animation ever and still not be interesting in the slightest, this is also how it is in video games which explains one of the reasons I hate Play station fanboys so much.
Sure, graphics aren´t everything, but alot of people are entertained by Adam Philips flash. And it´s not supposed to be comic, it´s a more fantasy/fable theme.
Yeah I admit he has good skill, but if he doesn't know how to make his flash fun or involving to watch then he shouldn't deserve the reward.
Again, that´s your personal opinion. Which do you think should have won the prize?
At 6/1/08 10:58 AM, BananaBreadMuffin wrote:
I have this insatiable urge to make a flash, but similarly, this naggling doubt in my head that stems from it being time consuming and I'd have to re-learn flash and such.
I get the same thing. I´m always thinking of good ideas for flash shorts, and i even think if i can pull it off, but when i start i realize it´s gonna take time and i just end up quitting when i´m 50 frames through :(
I will finish one soon though i hope. I just started one that could turn out well if i put some effort into it.