the idea is good
nice made... Imo you cannot compare the attack on pearl harbor with the bomb on hiroshima. That bomb has still effect on the people there because there were born so much children with mental or psychical handicaps.
It's good to let the people know what the consequences are so something horrible like this should never happen again!
give me a break !
you obivously don't know shit about this subject retard the only reason we droped that bomb which we should apologize for was because Japan had such amazing defense it would have taken 1,000,000 AMERICAN soldier lives now if I hear anyone say BUT THERE SOLDIERS then cut off your balls now because you don't deserve to reproduce because they are people just as much as the people who died in Hiroshima both of those cities were KEY to the industrialism that created tanks and guns PEOPLE just happened to be there to get in the way we shouldn't apologize its how we won and Japan is just pissed because we were the only country to succesfully invade their country of gay POKEMONESS INFACT we should bomb them again remeber in all war there are casulties we just found a way to take care of all of them in one or two shots instead of a few thousands so hiroshima is a good thing it ended a war that could have been long and painful more than the bomb could ever do.
Did you even read the warning? I'm not attacking the United States, ok!? This movie is just to illustrate how great power can be, and shouldn't be abused. Anyway, I don't think you know too much about nuclear warfare. The bombs in Hiroshima and Nagasaki caused much worse long-lasting pain than anything else in the second world war. I could mention malignant cancer and mutation amongst survivors. Or I could mention all the handicapped children that were born for decades after the bomb. These children weren't even part of the war. Why should they suffer? If you think that isn't reason enough to at least appologize that's fine by me, but don't expect me to agree. Thanks for the review, though! :)
uh?????
That was really well done. But uh wasn't Hiroshima a secondary target, they bombed that because of cloud cover over another city. I may be wrong and maybe that was Nagasaki. If the people of that city ran for cover when they saw the B-29 Superfortress over head there would have been fewer casualties. One question that has yet to be answered is what country bombed Nagasaki? I'm not entirely sure but I think it was Britain.
Now enough of that, good job I liked it.
counter point to last review
The bomb in no way secured us any rights. By the time the bomb was used japan was incapable of any type of resonable counter offensive and thus was no threat to the mainland United States or our rights and government. The bomb was used to end the war quickly and to save the lives of american soldiers, but it did this by killing civilians instead. The direct and intended use of any weapon on civilians in war or any other situation is an inapropriate use of power and thus I don't believe we were wrong in using the bomb, but we erred greatly in its application.
In the A-Bombs defence
Using the bomb must have been a seriously hard decision to make, but it did help put an end to a war and a lot more people would have died in the trenches had the war continued on foot. It's the not the sort of thing you'd apologise about, it wasn't an accident or anything...