not really a review...
I'm really only reviewing this to give a bit of information to the author (assuming they read this) and anyone else who chooses to read this. First off the conventional bombing raids used against the Japanese prior to the atomic bombs killed as many or more people than the dropping of the atomic bombs. The only reason so much controversy comes from atomic bombs is because so much devastation was caused from a single weapon. There really was no difference between the atomic bombs and the other air raids the U.S. executed during the war but you don't hear anyone calling for apologies and talking about abuse of power over those. Second, if the U.S. had not dropped the bombs, pressuring Japan into surrender, a full-scale invasion would have been required which would have cost the lives of many more people, Japanese and American, than the dropping of the atomic bombs. It was actually a quite desirable trade off. Obviously more so for the Americans because they were saving many more of thier own soldiers, but it was not necessarily as terrible of an atrocity toward the Japanese as often suggested, which is perhaps why no one ever apologized.