At 4/7/08 09:51 PM, Buster1 wrote: http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/43 2872Noahdecoco,titanman

sorry for double post but ihave found some more
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /433284/20/score both
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /433284/19/scoreGUNZO,AceBobcat,Stealth-
Boi,isurdadyder,

wow you guys rule and are dedicated

GRAAAAAAAAAAARGH!

*angelic smile*

Thank you bob, I now have a garbage whistle for accidentally flagging a TOTW review. Hurrah.

At 4/7/08 08:49 PM, liquidfire666 wrote: Why did everybodys whistles get slashed down to garbage after that rule was put in, mine didn't but like 5 people that use this fourm some even had silver and they went right to garbage.

Because they can't handle flagging only abusive reviews.

Their whistles wouldn't be affected by bob's newspost. it takes more than one overworked administrator to do that much damage when he's not even dealing with reviews in the first place.

are these garbage whistles that seem to be handed out left and right permanent or will it go back to where it was after a while or what? do we have to get it back up ourselves. god this is so confusing.

At 4/8/08 12:12 AM, DBlach wrote: are these garbage whistles that seem to be handed out left and right permanent or will it go back to where it was after a while or what? do we have to get it back up ourselves. god this is so confusing.

no, you just need to flag appropriately from now one. It all depends on how much of a hole you dug yourself as well, you can continue to get negative whistle points after you've reached garbage and could potentially get yourself into a very deep hole if you kept flagging the wrong things (ie, non abusive reviews) and you would need to flag appropriately a whole lot to get back to Normal status.

You get more negative whistle points if you flag wrongly than you would get positive points if you're right.

xWolFx6
Reason: Unconstructive review.

Ok guys just another reminder. it seems more and more people have been complaining and saying their whistle level is now garbage. Remember.

1) READ the review, no matter who reccommends it be flagged. Read it for youself.
2) Not all useless reviews are abusive.
3) DO NOT I REPEAT DO NOT FLAG reviews from before 2005.
4) DO NOT I REPEAT DO NOT FLAG reviews of 'spam flashes' or the usual useless crap collabs.
5) Try not to flag turd of the weeks either. Its suicidal.

This game is stolen http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/43 4056

it is a game called ladbrokes miniball.

http://www.ladbrokes.com/games/miniball/

This one was pretty obvious i dont see how it got this far through the judging stage.

At 4/8/08 05:26 AM, Vorlek wrote: This game is stolen http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/43 4056

it is a game called ladbrokes miniball.

http://www.ladbrokes.com/games/miniball/


This one was pretty obvious i dont see how it got this far through the judging stage.

It was VERY obvious- they even tried blotting out the logos and stuff, but didn't do a very good job. You can even see the original graphics for the One Player and Two Player modes underneath the new text they put in front.

At 4/8/08 05:37 AM, ParadoxVoid wrote:

At 4/8/08 05:26 AM, Vorlek wrote: This game is stolen http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/43 4056

it is a game called ladbrokes miniball.

http://www.ladbrokes.com/games/miniball/


This one was pretty obvious i dont see how it got this far through the judging stage.

It was VERY obvious- they even tried blotting out the logos and stuff, but didn't do a very good job. You can even see the original graphics for the One Player and Two Player modes underneath the new text they put in front.

yer, that was why i was wondering why it has got this far without anyone blowing their whistle on it. Its even got miniball still written in the middle of the pitch. Also all the fonts are arial because that is what happens with a decompiler when you dont have the correct font needed.

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/43 4057 - 1 here

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/43 4057 - Jackblackflo - very very pointless, bit like his review.

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /434050 - lol1083 - CAPS LOCK + shit review.

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/43 4042 - dungeons0 - Typing doesn't load after 3 other people have stated it doesn't constitute a review.

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /434026 - Lessermore, basketballa12 - Abusive, calls author a fag.

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/43 4024 - inti-creater - just agree's with another reviewer.

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /434018 - JmdMagic - I mean srsly.

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/43 4009 - ILoveMyAttitude - abusive

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/43 3993 - dooomsDave, - 1 worder.

Blam comment:

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/43 2633

Lots of hatred of haters here.

This on spam. Please don't post links to abusive reviews on spam.

Mission complete

Target: garbage whistle

Thank you so much for making these new (bullshit/unessacery) rules, Bob. I'm sure we all appriciate the garbage whistles you gave us.

Whew...hi guys. :D

http://retnuheilliw.newgrounds.com/revie ws/flash Review for nymph in love with tree

http://doogleflip.newgrounds.com/reviews /flash/4 Review for Torture The Emo

http://ariano.newgrounds.com/reviews/fla sh Reviews for Sonic'sQuestForPower3End, Pico's School Remake, Sonic VS Super Sonic 3, Tails XXX Cosmo Hentai #1, Sonic Shorts Collection, Sonic Vs. Ryu (TOAI3)

I'm unsure about ariano's reviews. They seem to be spamming the review body, and are generally useless, but he did award high scores for them. I have flagged them, however. FLAG AT YOUR OWN RISK. =O

And now, our feature presentation. *fanfare*

He's "19", and comes from "aremica". XD

Please, enjoy.

http://runescape45.newgrounds.com/review s/flash Reviews for SHOOT ASH!, shoot out III, and How Long is your Poo?

This kid loves his poo. >;)

http://runescape45.newgrounds.com/review s/flash/2 Endless War 3, Bubble Trouble, Platform Game Maker (?)

Question for mods: if you put code from a level editor into your review, is it considered as spam? Thanks.

http://runescape45.newgrounds.com/review s/flash/3 Mardek RPG: Chapter 2, Magus RPG

http://runescape45.newgrounds.com/review s/flash/4 the Kill Kar

http://runescape45.newgrounds.com/review s/flash/5 Sonic RPG eps5, Pico's School, Stab, Megaman Dead? pt. 1

http://runescape45.newgrounds.com/review s/flash/6 Amitoune Internet Client, Multiplayer Snake V1.03

http://runescape45.newgrounds.com/review s/flash/7 Naruto Fighting Game, Snow Fight 3.0.

http://runescape45.newgrounds.com/review s/flash/8 A Unicorn Giggle, TSUNAMI, lev. 1, Postal, Fellowship of Kings RPG

I've checked, and these don't link to spam submissions, but double check in case I've missed any. And they're all after 2005, so you should be safe.

"its useless like a pig" lol

Happy flagging, everyone. >;D

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/43 3963 - ShotToFace, leg666
both saying it should get blammed.
btw: before you ask this is no spam. It may be crap, but it's not spam.

Just found some more:
http://cristisrisen.newgrounds.com/revie ws/flash - Olympus Burger: Hades, Super-Duper Friends, Ann Coulter: Brainless,Messed-Up Bible Stories 2
There might be some more. Flag at your own risk.

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /434083 - Ace75 - Blam comment

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /434076 - bart95 - Blam comment

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /395555/6/score - giant selection here =D

At 4/8/08 01:55 PM, ZombiePhil wrote: http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /395555/6/score - giant selection here =D

giant selection - on a spam submission
oh I hate those new rules

At 4/8/08 02:17 PM, peT-the-dead wrote: giant selection - on a spam submission
oh I hate those new rules

The review mods have a point, but the submission in my eyes, should be deleted if it is that bad, that so many people post abusive posts.

Hello. :)

http://diminsonsam.newgrounds.com/review s/flash/3 Link's Problem, Legend Of Link 3,

http://diminsonsam.newgrounds.com/review s/flash/4 Zelda Short: Ganondorf,

http://diminsonsam.newgrounds.com/review s/flash/5 Zelda3: FreeLoading Link, Link Strikes Back 2, Link Strikes Back 3, Link Strikes Back 4

http://diminsonsam.newgrounds.com/review s/flash/6 Family Guy: Fighting Game

http://kainthedragooner.newgrounds.com/r eviews/flash/2 Legend Of Zelda: Forgotten Soul (?), True Zelda Sing Along

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /308690/138/score Indigo Extreme

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /411504/30/score Loads here!

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /430020/8/score Goes back a number of pages.

For the last two links, don't flag everything blindly! There are some acceptable reviews in there, so use your own judgement as always.

Anything with a (?) are reviews that I'm unsure about.

Thanks to Mechabloby for giving me the last two links. <3

Happy Flagging. :D

So many idiot Zelda fans. Fucking posers. I like one of the first.

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /417320/5/score

Last one. I'm currently checking out any anti-Zelda flashes for more of these abusive ones, looks like I'll get at least 10 today.

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/43 4117Zeelack
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/43 4119Nezzadar,AnimeAlex
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /433998/5/scoreAntieMaki
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /433935/10/scoreNersop,7t4o,KageOni,w33n ,DementedRock,sldghmmr
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /433984/23/score(last 2 pages)Madden-Man,Nazi-Barney,MeatShake,o SKARSmhiP,LatinoHawk,chaosknight514,TheC atsLeotards,skarptandad
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /431937/142/scoreCrazyPerson101,Bantrina tious(page 141)Lucario64,
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /432427/122/scoreMeatShake

btw none of thies are spammy flahes

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /228814/55/score

From there to the end.

Junk from 2005.

At 4/8/08 04:55 PM, Searfirehawk wrote: Junk from 2005.

thats acceptable, 2004 and earlyer are not ;)