At 5/28/05 11:54 PM, BonusStage wrote:At 5/28/05 11:37 PM, DaSadGuy wrote: darth vader would win..NO, Maul had horns ... HORNS
This cow has horns too...And guess what? It knows how to fly...
Darth Maul = Pwned!
At 5/28/05 11:54 PM, BonusStage wrote:At 5/28/05 11:37 PM, DaSadGuy wrote: darth vader would win..NO, Maul had horns ... HORNS
This cow has horns too...And guess what? It knows how to fly...
Darth Maul = Pwned!
At 5/29/05 12:00 AM, OVlez wrote: How about a better question?
Grievous vs Maul.
Now isn't that toned down a bit and a little less one sided?
thats still one sided. its greivous obviously, in the cartoon series (yes i watch cartoons on cartoon nework) he can use 5 lightsabers. also darth maul is funky looking. just like my big toe.
At 5/29/05 12:03 AM, cant_count_to5 wrote: thats still one sided.
I know, but notice how I said "a little less one sided". :P
its greivous obviously, in the cartoon series (yes i watch cartoons on cartoon nework) he can use 5 lightsabers.
I thought he could use 6....
Apologies aren't what I look for. Redemption is what I want!
Look at my profile to see a true cockhead! DO IT NOW!
At 5/29/05 12:04 AM, OVlez wrote:At 5/29/05 12:03 AM, cant_count_to5 wrote: thats still one sided.I know, but notice how I said "a little less one sided". :P
its greivous obviously, in the cartoon series (yes i watch cartoons on cartoon nework) he can use 5 lightsabers.I thought he could use 6....
nope. he has 4 arms, and can use a leg to weild a lightsaber so 5. unless he can walk on his face or something.
At 5/28/05 11:37 PM, DaSadGuy wrote: darth vader would win..
You hit the nail right on the fucking head, there.
At 5/29/05 12:00 AM, OVlez wrote: How about a better question?
Grievous vs Maul.
Now isn't that toned down a bit and a little less one sided?
Grievous is a coward. Most likely Maul....
At 5/29/05 12:07 AM, cant_count_to5 wrote: nope. he has 4 arms, and can use a leg to weild a lightsaber so 5. unless he can walk on his face or something.
What's wrong with lightsaber feet? :P
Apologies aren't what I look for. Redemption is what I want!
Look at my profile to see a true cockhead! DO IT NOW!
At 5/28/05 11:42 PM, AmazeKing wrote: okay i would say maul just because he could get a cheap shot with his double blade
Yeah, or he could just slip up and stab himself.
At 5/29/05 12:13 AM, Damn_yoyo wrote:At 5/29/05 12:00 AM, OVlez wrote: How about a better question?Grievous is a coward. Most likely Maul....
Grievous vs Maul.
Now isn't that toned down a bit and a little less one sided?
doea maul control hundreds of thousands of millions of droids? who killed a bunch of jedi? who can use a lightsaber with his foot? ill tell you who. GRIEVOUS
At 5/29/05 12:07 AM, cant_count_to5 wrote: nope. he has 4 arms, and can use a leg to weild a lightsaber so 5. unless he can walk on his face or something.
He could use his pen0r as a saber...after all, he's a robot :)
Oh...wait...
At 5/29/05 12:13 AM, Damn_yoyo wrote: Grievous is a coward. Most likely Maul....
If that's true, then tell me how he was able to kill over 5 jedi at a time without any trouble?
In the movie they call him a coward just because he would run away whenever Anakin was involved.... then he got his hand cut off....
Apologies aren't what I look for. Redemption is what I want!
Look at my profile to see a true cockhead! DO IT NOW!
I don't know who'd win in a fight, but I do know that kids dressed as Darth Vader bring in 42% more candy by weight than kids dressed as Darth Maul.
At 5/29/05 12:19 AM, AnzRage wrote: Now here is a nice photo.
At 5/29/05 12:21 AM, Ozcar wrote:At 5/29/05 12:19 AM, AnzRage wrote: Now here is a nice photo.Link to the original one?
lol I don't think your link works. I don't have the link saved but I have the full picture on my computer. I had it long before this topic.
At 5/29/05 12:24 AM, AnzRage wrote: lol I don't think your link works. I don't have the link saved but I have the full picture on my computer. I had it long before this topic.
Well, it works ... Just try it :)
At 5/28/05 11:44 PM, mighty_potato wrote: Darth Maul was not a Sith Lord like Vader was. He was still the apprentice of Darth Sidious. He did not have the skills in the Sith that Vader had. Clearly, Darth Vader who is a Sith Lord would destroy Darth Maul.
</nerdy talk>
always two sith there are, the master and the apprentice. as long as the emporer was still around vader was the apprentice. Plus older ben clearly would have wiped the floor with vader if he tried. Where do you think the "strike me down and I'll become more powerful than you could ever imagine." line came from?
probably darth vader because he did last longer than darth maul... ACUALLY we dont really know how long darth maul has lived. Darth Maul is more scary looking than darth vader. Back in 1977 when Stars IV was released, darth vader did look scary back then, but nto now
At 5/28/05 11:36 PM, a_lost_prophet wrote: Who would win in a duel? Darth Vader or Darth Maul? MY vote goes to Vader just because he's bad-ass like that. No one can match his power with the Force. It took his son to defeat him.
well then you just answered your own question.Force powers pwns all!(stronger Ones anyway)
At 5/29/05 12:29 AM, stafffighter wrote:
. Where do you think the "strike me down and I'll become more powerful than you could ever imagine." line came from?
Family Guy
oh you people wanna take this outside! ill go get my lightsaber and cool darth vader helmet and we will fight to the death.
No one can match his power with the Force.
Freedon Nadd.
Exar Kun.
Darth Sidious.
But then, Darth Maul is some punk-ass Iridonian.
Darth Vader wins.
ill list best siths to worst.
1) lord vader
2)general grievous
3)darth sidious
4)count dooku
5)darth maul
thats all the siths that i know.
At 5/29/05 12:44 AM, cant_count_to5 wrote: ill list best siths to worst.
1) lord vader
2)general grievous
3)darth sidious
4)count dooku
5)darth maul
thats all the siths that i know.
First of all, General Grievous isn't a sith.
If by Count Dooku, you mean Darth Tyrannus, OK.
What about Exar Kun?
Or Freedon Nadd?
Or Darth Nihlis?
Or Darth Trayus?
By the way, Palpatine is known to have used fleet destroying force storms. So techincally he should be higher than Vader.
At 5/29/05 12:49 AM, lonesniper08 wrote:At 5/29/05 12:44 AM, cant_count_to5 wrote: ill list best siths to worst.First of all, General Grievous isn't a sith.
1) lord vader
2)general grievous
3)darth sidious
4)count dooku
5)darth maul
thats all the siths that i know.
If by Count Dooku, you mean Darth Tyrannus, OK.
What about Exar Kun?
Or Freedon Nadd?
Or Darth Nihlis?
Or Darth Trayus?
By the way, Palpatine is known to have used fleet destroying force storms. So techincally he should be higher than Vader.
well darth vader killed him so vader is higher. as for everyone else, i forgot to think about them. and the greivous thing, that is sort of true and not true. he is sided with the dark side and can use lightsabers, but he isnt a sith aprentice or sith lord. so well he is about half.
None of you guys know what you are talking about.
Anakin Skywalker had a midichlorian count of 24,000, making him the most powerful Jedi in terms of raw power. Darth Maul could barely lift his own weener with the Force. His only forte was using a saber, which Vader could STILL best him in.
It's clearly stated in various sources that Anakin Skywalker, had he not turned to the dark side, would have been able to manipulate the Force completely. But because of his fall he lost that chance. :\ Makes you wish he kinda didn't go into the suit.
Also, Obi-Wan got lucky with Maul. Maul was actually calling up the Force at the time when he got cut in half. But since he was so far down the dark side it took longer to respond then normal. This is also clearly stated in various sources.
kthxbye.
Darth Maul got pwned by a freakin padawan(n00b)
So Darth Vader would kick his ass.