At 9/3/07 08:11 PM, FourthHorsemanDeath wrote:
I'm not sure which kind I'd like to learn, I saw a style where you harden your hands and other stuff, but I kinda want to learn to Ninjitsu and other techniques like it, and not just learn the style but the history behind it as well
Hardening of the hands is emphesized in a couple different styles, karate and kung fu are the two that immediately come to mind. But this is something that I'm not sure is really emphesized is most modern day schools, or even in America. You might be able to find a school that teaches it but the only resources that I know of for "iron body" or "iron palm" training come from the internet. Link.
As for what style you should train in, ninjitsu would be good I believe, though I really don't know much about it... My experience is with kenpo karate and unfortunantly New Hampshire is one of the few states that does not have a tracy's karate studio (where I train), so unfor tunantly I have no specific suggestions... However, unless you have your heart set on a specific style (which is fine) i would look for someplace that emphesizes self defense, which is most places these days.
---------
Ok, so I have a few things on my mind.
First of all human weapon. I agree with Mono, it hasn't been that great lately. I've kinda had to force myself to watch the last couple episodes, though krav maga was pretty interesting, what did you all think?
That "bursting" technique seemed fairly effective as did some of the other stuff, I was actually mildly impressed. Though they were doing a technique against a gun to the side of the head and it hit me, I actually started to laugh a little. They disarmed their attacker and pointed the gun at him. Ok, all well and fine, I have no problem with that technique. Our answer to that situation however (that being us Chinese kenpo karate people) is to step forward, pivot, check the arm and eye spear all at the same time, then immediately put the arm in a lock and dislocate it as you take your attacker to the ground, you then drop a knee on his chest and punch to the face...
With the krav maga technique you take controll of the situation, with the kenpo karate technique you end the situation. (<emphesis on the period) I just though that was kinda funny is all :)
------------
Second thing on my mind. I just watched severla parts of a series of youtube videos that pitted brazilian jiu-jitsu against other styles, they look kinda old. Here's one of them. Now if you find the others and watch them you will notice a recurring theme, jiu-jitsu always seems to win. And this bothered me for some reason, sure, Brazilian jiu-jitsu is very effective, no doubt about that but there was just something about the fights that I watched. I couldn't put my finger on it for several minutes, after closely studying the fights I realized something. Based on what I saw, jiu-jitsu can work at all levels of intensity, you can hold back a little and the technique you use will still slowly (rather than quickly) suffocate your opponent. With other martial arts you can't hold back a little and expect equivilant results. Most martial arts don't work half way. The people fighting the jiu-jitsu practitioner, it occoured to me, were sparring. They were going in there not intending to (seriously) hurt their opponent and because of this they lost, every one of them. it seems to me that the line between an effective fighting style and a sport for jui-jitsu is a very fine one. Not so much for most martial arts. In short, I don't believe they were fair fights.
Now I'm not saying that these people would have won the fights if they had gone all out as if their lives depended on it, I can't speak for their skills, I'm just wondering if the fights would have gone differently if they weren't sport fighting.
--------
And this is the last thing on my mind, related to martial arts that is. I copied this off of Al Tracy's web site. It puts into words just about everything that bothers me about "MMA" and the like.
========================================
================
What effect has the popularity of the exposure on television of "Ultimate Fighting" had on the Martial Arts?
99% Negative!
With the Michael Vick and "Pit Bull fighting" making the headlines the comparison was made between the Ultimate Fights and Pit Bulls. As one lover of both stated, "the only difference between the two is the dogs do not get to "Tap Out"! And of course, the name of one of the 5 man fighting teams is "PIT BULLS".
What parent, especially a mother, is going to let their kids watch this on TV? Let alone study in a studio that teaches this type of fighting?
Recently there was a TV article on a survey taken in a larger Penn. town of the effect on the current effect of "Ultimate Fighting" on the enrollment in Martial Arts Studios. Tradition studios stated their enrollment on an average was down 40% with the advent of "Ultimate Fighting" on TV. And the studio who claimed to teach "Mixed Martial Arts" had no increase in Students.
ONE QUESTION? How do you train - to lie on your back - and have your head and face, pounded from above, by a fist covered with 4oz gloves?
The promoters of these fights (Especially Pay per View) made over $250,000,000 last year. The average viewer is a Male 18-35 years of age.
Reality: is this really the "Ultimate Fighting" to be used on the street in Life or Death Situation?
Let's look at the rules!
1. Weight divisions -
2. So far no divisions of females or kids. Wonder why?
3. Time Limits
4. Referee to keep you from being killed!
5. No kicks, knees or strikes to the groin
6. No strikes to or ripping out of the throat.
7. No strikes or gouging the eyes
8. No head butts
9. No ripping of the ears
10. Hands protected by gloves
11. No kicks to the knees
12. No biting
13. If you are losing - you can "tap out" and shake hands!
Also for your consideration:
1. No guns - 2. No Knives - 3. No clubs - 4. No multiple opponents
(So much for "ultimate".)
========================================
==================
Please, your thoughts?