At worst he's just another part of the Freemason world-plan that remanifested itself in Davos but stems from the United nations.
Bruh
At 11/7/20 09:58 PM, SuperiorGhostgamer wrote:At 11/7/20 09:57 PM, Yabuturtle wrote:Salty. Is that better salty sam?At 11/7/20 09:36 PM, SuperiorGhostgamer wrote:You're not using that word correctly.At 11/7/20 09:03 PM, Yabuturtle wrote:Some one is Ssaalltttyy.At 11/7/20 08:41 PM, SuperiorGhostgamer wrote: Its fucking over for impotent sunny D.Yeah we all heard this before. A civil war will start, he will be a fascist, he is the antichrist. Blah blah blah. Many people have said that and guess what? They were all wrong. Like Trump or not, they were still all wrong. They weren't right the first time Trump got elected, why the hell would they be right now?
If that man stays in office we will have a civil war.
Not kidding. That man has done nothing but sit on his ass, act with as much malice as he could, or failing either just make everyone's life a living hell in some way. And that putting it lightly. The guy literally sent his goons to seize medical equipment in blue states to give his cronies for resale.
No. Food is salty. People are pissed off.
Teacher, goth, communist, cynic, alcoholic, master swordsman, king of shitpoasts.
It's better to die together than to live alone.
Sig by Decky
At 11/8/20 04:50 AM, SirKaotik wrote: Biden won the election
I still can't get over the fact that Giuliani held a press conference at Four Seasons Total Landscaping. I mean... just look at it! Across the street is a crematorium, a few yards up the road is an adult book store. There's no way in hell they chose that location "because the I95 is close and because of security".
Surf Nazis must die! || Wi/Ht? #38
At 11/7/20 11:56 PM, Fro wrote:At 11/7/20 11:49 PM, RydiaLockheart wrote:They knew exactly what they were doing. People forget that Obama was a very conservative/moderate candidate.
My husband the bleeding heart progressive says that Obama was to the right of Reagan, and I agree.
We had a chat about recent events lately, which we don't often do because we have a James Carville-Mary Maudlin type of marriage. He's optimistic, but I can't help but think that a) this isn't over and b) should all results hold, this is a Pyrrhic victory for the Dems. They have no Senate control (and I think Georgia runoffs will go to the GOP), they LOST seats in the House, and they barely squeaked Biden in. If Pelosi doesn't heed the warnings of her caucus (and there's no sign she will), 2022 and 2024 will be bloodbaths. Also, good luck getting anything whatsoever done with a four-seat majority.
As for here in Pennsylvania, whether or not there was any fraud, the state was woefully unprepared for the deluge of mail-in ballots. State officials warned for months they weren't ready and as usual, Governor Dipshit did his own thing. He's turned a lot of former supporters into haters (my husband included), so once his term is up in 2022, things are gonna be very interesting here.
I just wonder who's gonna be running, since both he and Toomey will be retiring. The benches have both been depleted. All of the strong candidates on either side are in some sort of office already.
At 11/8/20 11:46 AM, RydiaLockheart wrote:At 11/7/20 11:56 PM, Fro wrote:My husband the bleeding heart progressive says that Obama was to the right of Reagan, and I agree.At 11/7/20 11:49 PM, RydiaLockheart wrote:They knew exactly what they were doing. People forget that Obama was a very conservative/moderate candidate.
We had a chat about recent events lately, which we don't often do because we have a James Carville-Mary Maudlin type of marriage. He's optimistic, but I can't help but think that a) this isn't over and b) should all results hold, this is a Pyrrhic victory for the Dems. They have no Senate control (and I think Georgia runoffs will go to the GOP), they LOST seats in the House, and they barely squeaked Biden in. If Pelosi doesn't heed the warnings of her caucus (and there's no sign she will), 2022 and 2024 will be bloodbaths. Also, good luck getting anything whatsoever done with a four-seat majority.
As for here in Pennsylvania, whether or not there was any fraud, the state was woefully unprepared for the deluge of mail-in ballots. State officials warned for months they weren't ready and as usual, Governor Dipshit did his own thing. He's turned a lot of former supporters into haters (my husband included), so once his term is up in 2022, things are gonna be very interesting here.
I just wonder who's gonna be running, since both he and Toomey will be retiring. The benches have both been depleted. All of the strong candidates on either side are in some sort of office already.
I also don't think the Dems did exceptionally well -and for the reasons you state.
Pelosi's performance as Speaker has been disappointing, to put it mildly. So many missed opportunities to have been effectual, but her 'concerned' stance, like Collins (and how did she stay in her seat??!?), is not in the interests of the country. I am hoping that Pelosi will be replaced; AOC would be a positive transition, but I'm unsure about her Junior status in the House to qualify.
Your view of what's been happening in PA is eye-opening. Always helpful to hear from those on the ground, rather than just what the media wants to say/print for ratings and profits. Hope the PA Gov opposition has a worthy candidate on tap to serve Pennsylvanians better.
I'm cautiously optimistic about the Georgia run-offs and am supporting Dems there for that reason, but being a New Englander, what do I know about Georgia or Georgians and how they will vote on the day?
It's been a hell four years, now that's over, a lot of work to do to rebuild that will take a long time. There's plenty of blame to go around on both sides of the aisle as to how we got here as a nation. Unless we can fix, or at least begin to mend those problems, we will revisit the last four years in the future. Inequality, racism, poverty, voter disenfranchisement, corporate meddling/lobbying in politics. To reach those goals, the Dems will have to tip the balance in the Senate and McConnell (and Pelosi, tbh) needs to be retired.
At 11/7/20 11:54 PM, Fro wrote:At 11/7/20 11:49 PM, UncleLad wrote: There's more votes than registered voters in the key states. It's sad people can't pick up on the voter fraud going on.Its fun to find the people who have a difficulty with reality and math all in one statement.
Go ahead, show us where this happened. Show us the numbers.
Idk how its possible for a state like nevada to have 125% turnout. It's very unlikely for a state to even go to 100%
At 11/8/20 12:51 PM, UncleLad wrote:At 11/7/20 11:54 PM, Fro wrote:Idk how its possible for a state like nevada to have 125% turnout. It's very unlikely for a state to even go to 100%At 11/7/20 11:49 PM, UncleLad wrote: There's more votes than registered voters in the key states. It's sad people can't pick up on the voter fraud going on.Its fun to find the people who have a difficulty with reality and math all in one statement.
Go ahead, show us where this happened. Show us the numbers.
Care to substantiate that statement?
You still haven't shown or cited anything.
Cartoonist lad, occasional BBS poster and all-round human hailing from the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.
NOTICE: Anyone caught posting A.I. 'art' on Newgrounds.com will have their balls ripped off and flushed down the toilet.
At 11/8/20 03:52 AM, Calamaistr wrote:
Fascism has nothing to do with nationalism
fascism is defined as "palingenetic ultranationalism", as defined by roger griffin
it literally has everything to do with nationalism
Fascism is not a political system it is a political measure, it means that you use a mob to enforce politics with violence.
every single political system - from fascism to democratic republics to even socialism - operates using the threat of political violence as a consequence
this is not a defining feature of any political system when every single political system required it to operate, you idiot
does no one do any research before opening their face-hole on here, jesus christ
Need some music for a flash or game? Check it out. If none of this works send me a PM, I'm taking requests.
At 11/8/20 12:55 PM, ChazDude wrote:At 11/8/20 12:51 PM, UncleLad wrote:Care to substantiate that statement?At 11/7/20 11:54 PM, Fro wrote:Idk how its possible for a state like nevada to have 125% turnout. It's very unlikely for a state to even go to 100%At 11/7/20 11:49 PM, UncleLad wrote: There's more votes than registered voters in the key states. It's sad people can't pick up on the voter fraud going on.Its fun to find the people who have a difficulty with reality and math all in one statement.
Go ahead, show us where this happened. Show us the numbers.
You still haven't shown or cited anything.
UncleLad is quoting this pic which was previously linked in this thread.
UncleLad is a twit; if he did any double-checking of sources rather than taking them at face-value he’d realise the pic is bollocks and the number of voters presented is bollocks.
——
Going back to what Fro said pages back, I do despair that the aftermath of Trump is to encourage people like this to just open their mouths without thinking.
Some interesting reads. Not all, just a couple I found. But I don't want to get in a fight, I genuinely just want a fair election.
https://www.investmentwatchblog.com/dozens-of-documented-examples-of-election-shenanigans/
At 11/8/20 01:24 PM, TurkeyOnAStick wrote:At 11/8/20 12:55 PM, ChazDude wrote:UncleLad is quoting this pic which was previously linked in this thread.At 11/8/20 12:51 PM, UncleLad wrote:Care to substantiate that statement?At 11/7/20 11:54 PM, Fro wrote:Idk how its possible for a state like nevada to have 125% turnout. It's very unlikely for a state to even go to 100%At 11/7/20 11:49 PM, UncleLad wrote: There's more votes than registered voters in the key states. It's sad people can't pick up on the voter fraud going on.Its fun to find the people who have a difficulty with reality and math all in one statement.
Go ahead, show us where this happened. Show us the numbers.
You still haven't shown or cited anything.
UncleLad is a twit; if he did any double-checking of sources rather than taking them at face-value he’d realise the pic is bollocks and the number of voters presented is bollocks.
——
Going back to what Fro said pages back, I do despair that the aftermath of Trump is to encourage people like this to just open their mouths without thinking.
No. I haven't even looked at those, nor did I know that they were in this thread. But it's sad that people have to rely on name calling. I don't want to do that. Just want a fair election is all.
At 11/8/20 01:25 PM, UncleLad wrote: Some interesting reads. Not all, just a couple I found. But I don't want to get in a fight, I genuinely just want a fair election.
https://www.investmentwatchblog.com/dozens-of-documented-examples-of-election-shenanigans/
It’s an unreliable conspiracy website.
https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/news/releases/limestone-county-social-worker-charged-134-felony-counts-involving-election-fraud
It’s one incident of fraud, and it’s in Texas which won’t affect the conclusion.
At 11/8/20 01:28 PM, UncleLad wrote: No. I haven't even looked at those, nor did I know that they were in this thread.
You still haven’t shared your source for that unsubstantiated comment.
But it's sad that people have to rely on name calling. I don't want to do that. Just want a fair election is all.
Sorry chap, but you don’t get the morale high-ground for being responsible for sharing complete tripe on the internet.
At 11/8/20 01:28 PM, UncleLad wrote:At 11/8/20 01:24 PM, TurkeyOnAStick wrote:No. I haven't even looked at those, nor did I know that they were in this thread. But it's sad that people have to rely on name calling. I don't want to do that. Just want a fair election is all.At 11/8/20 12:55 PM, ChazDude wrote:UncleLad is quoting this pic which was previously linked in this thread.At 11/8/20 12:51 PM, UncleLad wrote:Care to substantiate that statement?At 11/7/20 11:54 PM, Fro wrote:Idk how its possible for a state like nevada to have 125% turnout. It's very unlikely for a state to even go to 100%At 11/7/20 11:49 PM, UncleLad wrote: There's more votes than registered voters in the key states. It's sad people can't pick up on the voter fraud going on.Its fun to find the people who have a difficulty with reality and math all in one statement.
Go ahead, show us where this happened. Show us the numbers.
You still haven't shown or cited anything.
UncleLad is a twit; if he did any double-checking of sources rather than taking them at face-value he’d realise the pic is bollocks and the number of voters presented is bollocks.
——
Going back to what Fro said pages back, I do despair that the aftermath of Trump is to encourage people like this to just open their mouths without thinking.
Fair election? Republicans have disfranchised more people than there is voter fraud, which they have investigated to great length only to find very little evidence of but using it to create more voting regulations to make it harder for people to vote. This is nothing more than losers crying about how unfair things are when it doesn't go their way when they have been giving themselves an edge for decades.
Analysis: Partisan gerrymandering has benefited Republicans more than Democrats
Republican Voter Suppression Efforts Are Targeting Minorities, Journalist Says
And this is on top of USPS being controlled by Republicans, two of which donate and fundraise for Republican candidates, slowing service down by getting rid of sorting machines, and mail boxes, in a time when mail is supposed to surges due to more mail in ballots - Which Trump has railed against during the pandemic. The USPS often ignores court order to speed things up, knowing that not doing so would jeopardize people's votes if they don't arrive, or arrive on time to be counted.
Yeah UncleLad, your statement that more than 100% of registered voters voted in Nevada was disproved (by me) earlier in the thread and it literally took 15 seconds. Tell me how you think one might verify if that statement was correct or not, and then do it yourself.
Like I said to Bumdigger when he made the same claim, you need to be DOUBLY skeptical about things that seem like they're the kind of thing you would believe in, because they're the sort of thing you'd fall for.
You need to admit you've been duped and then really look at why you fell for it and what you can do to stop falling for lies in the future. Spreading bullshit on the internet is actively harmful, and knowingly being the kind of person who gets duped by malicious liars is shameful. Sort it out
Everyone else on Earth has noticed that almost all the people who believe in easily-disprovable bullshit vote for far-right candidates. The scary and horrifying thing is how many of them there are.
At 11/8/20 04:00 PM, Yabuturtle wrote:At 11/8/20 02:07 PM, Earfetish wrote: Everyone else on Earth has noticed that almost all the people who believe in easily-disprovable bullshit vote for far-right candidates. The scary and horrifying thing is how many of them there are.You forgot about the obvious watermarks they have put in ballots.
Election Ballots water marked with encryption code for sting operation. An intelligence officer is reporting that Trump has set up the Dems to expose the alleged systemic election fraud. It’s said every genuine ballot had been encrypted watermarked to show authenticity a bit like how money is marked to show authenticity.
https://www.roxytube.com/watch/pTOu99Hksw7sBZn
I don't know why it's taking so long for people to admit that they were duped and this entire election was a fraud to begin with. Biden could not have won without cheating. Trump isn't the one that had to cheat because he doesn't need to. He was already popular before he became president.
Oh and btw, I have 3 youtube accounts and this was uploaded on all 3. All 3 videos were taken down within an hour. What does that tell you? That should be pretty obvious that a lot of people are in on this and don't want the truth to be told. It won't even work even if you upload it to vimeo, or daily motion or other websites as they will delete it right off the bat. Media telling you there's baseless claims for voter fraud...yeah, because they were the ones censoring the evidence so it would appear there were no claims. Thankfully there are other sites that will keep it there. Also they still remove videos of empty hospitals and people getting diagnosed with covid, despite not getting tested for it, ect.
People who think Biden won fair and square couldn't be more wrong. Media was also the same people who told you Epstein killed himself. This doesn't give ANYBODY a friggin clue as to what's going on? That maybe, just maybe, you were duped once again and don't want to admit it. The sooner you admit it, the better. I mean really, the government hasn't lied before. Because no government in history has ever betrayed it's own people multiple times right? Just ask the communists. xD
Congrats on promoting fake news.
Fact check: DHS did not announce a sting operation using watermarks on ballots to root out fraud
At 11/8/20 04:12 PM, Yabuturtle wrote: You want to bury your head in the sand and not recognize the evil that is the ultra elite, fine.
Fact-checking isn’t what most people would call “burying your heading in the sand”.
Screaming “FRAUD” is a good way of making yourself stick out like a sore thumb, though, for sure. Especially when you send mass PMs to other people.
Next person who posts unsubstantiated claims gets banned. I’ve no tolerance for this anymore.
EDIT: ... are Americans really this sensitive to the word “twit”?
At 11/8/20 12:51 PM, UncleLad wrote:At 11/7/20 11:54 PM, Fro wrote:Idk how its possible for a state like nevada to have 125% turnout. It's very unlikely for a state to even go to 100%At 11/7/20 11:49 PM, UncleLad wrote: There's more votes than registered voters in the key states. It's sad people can't pick up on the voter fraud going on.Its fun to find the people who have a difficulty with reality and math all in one statement.
Go ahead, show us where this happened. Show us the numbers.
Same day registration / record turnout / don't be a sore loser.
At 11/8/20 04:24 PM, TurkeyOnAStick wrote:
:... are Americans really this sensitive to the word “twit”?
Considering it's essentially a bastardization of the word "twat", I think it's pretty justified if they are.
coo coo bitch lmfao
At 11/8/20 04:24 PM, TurkeyOnAStick wrote: ... are Americans really this sensitive to the word “twit”?Considering it's essentially a bastardization of the word "twat", I think it's pretty justified if they are.
coo coo bitch lmfao
At 11/8/20 05:15 PM, HavryloThePigeon wrote:At 11/8/20 04:24 PM, TurkeyOnAStick wrote: ... are Americans really this sensitive to the word “twit”?Considering it's essentially a bastardization of the word "twat", I think it's pretty justified if they are.
*grabs typewriter*
“Dear Roald Dahl estate,
“It has recently come to my attention that the children’s book author has written a book about a pair of unlikable characters. The title may be confused with British slang for female genitalia.
”Please address this issue promptly.
”Attached is a cover of the vicious article:
“P.S. please change the illustrator, too, as “Quentin” sounds like “Quim”.”
At 11/8/20 12:58 PM, Gario wrote: does no one do any research before opening their face-hole on here, jesus christ
Well, there's you, Margrave…
And that's about it.
How much alcohol do we have to offer to @Feoric in order to bribe him into coming back?
At 11/8/20 05:14 PM, HavryloThePigeon wrote:At 11/8/20 04:24 PM, TurkeyOnAStick wrote: ... are Americans really this sensitive to the word “twit”?Considering it's essentially a bastardization of the word "twat", I think it's pretty justified if they are.
"Twit" is one of the mildest insults I can think of, Sir Anthony. See for example: Monty Python's "Upper-Class Twit of the Year" sketch.
It's also completely divorced from the "female genitals" meaning (unlike "twat", which is only 80% divorced).
Teacher, goth, communist, cynic, alcoholic, master swordsman, king of shitpoasts.
It's better to die together than to live alone.
Sig by Decky
At 11/8/20 06:40 PM, Yabuturtle wrote:At 11/8/20 05:13 PM, Fim wrote:You know Trump is going to start taking to people in court on Monday right? Biden will get exposed as a cheater. And hopefully exposed as a pedo, where he went to Epstein's island and actually harassed girls there.At 11/8/20 12:51 PM, UncleLad wrote:Same day registration / record turnout / don't be a sore loser.At 11/7/20 11:54 PM, Fro wrote:Idk how its possible for a state like nevada to have 125% turnout. It's very unlikely for a state to even go to 100%At 11/7/20 11:49 PM, UncleLad wrote: There's more votes than registered voters in the key states. It's sad people can't pick up on the voter fraud going on.Its fun to find the people who have a difficulty with reality and math all in one statement.
Go ahead, show us where this happened. Show us the numbers.
My god!!! I've come across some really brainwashed people, but you take the cake.
At 11/8/20 12:20 PM, 1sky1heart wrote: I also don't think the Dems did exceptionally well -and for the reasons you state.
Pelosi's performance as Speaker has been disappointing, to put it mildly. So many missed opportunities to have been effectual, but her 'concerned' stance, like Collins (and how did she stay in her seat??!?), is not in the interests of the country. I am hoping that Pelosi will be replaced; AOC would be a positive transition, but I'm unsure about her Junior status in the House to qualify.
From what I read from some Mainers on a site I frequent, people mistrusted her opponent because she wasn't a Maine native. They're extremely insular up there and saw her as an insincere carpetbagger. Had a Mainer won the primary, the election may have turned out differently.
At 11/8/20 08:33 PM, Tyler wrote:At 11/8/20 02:52 AM, Margrave-Belial wrote:Oh no. Whats this? Could it be... evidence to the contrary?At 11/7/20 02:54 PM, Tyler wrote:Except for the ones who claim he assaulted them, and the handful of rape allegations.At 11/7/20 02:52 PM, DamnedByFate wrote:One is a famous man who women willfully threw themselves at.At 11/7/20 02:50 PM, Tyler wrote:Apparently not, else you'd criticise both Trump and Biden for their sexual improprieties.At 11/7/20 02:46 PM, DamnedByFate wrote:What are you talking about "sides" for? Im non-partisanAt 11/7/20 02:44 PM, Tyler wrote: Grab them by the pussy was under-appreciated. When a woman is attracted to a man, they WANT him to grab them. They think dominance is hot. And of course a famous, millionaire playboy is going to have many females chasing him. Everyone knows this. Its natural human sexual dynamics.And now you are excusing the very same behaviour you are blasting the other side for.
The other is a pedophile that touches kids against their willI will remind you that there's literally court documentation of a former Epstein sex slave saying Trump raped her when she was 14.
Pretty easy and obvious truthThe only obvious truth here is that you're full of shit when you say you're "non partisan".
I believe in truth and telling it. Something your partisan brain will never understand
Oh no, I guess you've proven me wrong, since that's the only allegation against him. Anyway, that's not even te allegation I'm talking about https://www.the-sun.com/news/1327085/jeffrey-epstein-showed-off-sex-slave-donald-trump/ , there's also this https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-features/a-timeline-of-donald-trumps-creepiness-while-he-owned-miss-universe-191860/ , and all of these https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/trump-sexual-assault-allegations-all-list-misconduct-karen-johnson-how-many-a9149216.html . But yeah, what a great guy. Fucking retard.
At 11/8/20 08:33 PM, Tyler wrote:At 11/8/20 02:52 AM, Margrave-Belial wrote:Oh no. Whats this? Could it be... evidence to the contrary?At 11/7/20 02:54 PM, Tyler wrote:Except for the ones who claim he assaulted them, and the handful of rape allegations.At 11/7/20 02:52 PM, DamnedByFate wrote:One is a famous man who women willfully threw themselves at.At 11/7/20 02:50 PM, Tyler wrote:Apparently not, else you'd criticise both Trump and Biden for their sexual improprieties.At 11/7/20 02:46 PM, DamnedByFate wrote:What are you talking about "sides" for? Im non-partisanAt 11/7/20 02:44 PM, Tyler wrote: Grab them by the pussy was under-appreciated. When a woman is attracted to a man, they WANT him to grab them. They think dominance is hot. And of course a famous, millionaire playboy is going to have many females chasing him. Everyone knows this. Its natural human sexual dynamics.And now you are excusing the very same behaviour you are blasting the other side for.
The other is a pedophile that touches kids against their willI will remind you that there's literally court documentation of a former Epstein sex slave saying Trump raped her when she was 14.
Pretty easy and obvious truthThe only obvious truth here is that you're full of shit when you say you're "non partisan".
I believe in truth and telling it. Something your partisan brain will never understand
The whole story over the 13 year old girl, Trump, and Epstein - not from some tabloid that is known for a lot of erroneous reporting.
At 11/8/20 08:31 PM, Tyler wrote:At 11/7/20 07:14 PM, Gimmick wrote:Im on a list for being too based, junior.At 11/7/20 02:44 PM, Tyler wrote:Slow down there Walmart Elliot, you're gonna end up on a sex offender list otherwise.At 11/7/20 02:33 PM, DamnedByFate wrote: And Trump is not a sex offender? Have you forgotten "grab them by the pussy" already?But he's not wrong
Newgrounds isn't where 4chan edgelord rejects go to die. Take that shit to twitter.
Slint approves of me! | "This is Newgrounds.com, not Disney.com" - WadeFulp
"Sit look rub panda" - Alan Davies
