At 10/2/20 09:34 PM, DrunkGecko wrote:At 10/2/20 09:33 PM, Synikal wrote: i'm not trying to get banned again for asking why lynching is bad, but not when it's white people.so you're a RACIST pedophile. got it
You totally missed the point with that last line. The deeper meaning and all.
~ All The World's A Stage... and I Choose to Fuck White Girls in the Ass on It ~
At 10/2/20 09:34 PM, DrunkGecko wrote:At 10/2/20 09:33 PM, Synikal wrote: i'm not trying to get banned again for asking why lynching is bad, but not when it's white people.so you're a RACIST pedophile. got it
Yeah I'm racist when it tells you not only in my signature but countless reviews how much I love white women.
~ All The World's A Stage... and I Choose to Fuck White Girls in the Ass on It ~
At 10/2/20 09:35 PM, Synikal wrote:At 10/2/20 09:34 PM, DrunkGecko wrote:You totally missed the point with that last line. The deeper meaning and all.At 10/2/20 09:33 PM, Synikal wrote: i'm not trying to get banned again for asking why lynching is bad, but not when it's white people.so you're a RACIST pedophile. got it
Notorious internet cunt
My old username was StaticSkull
She/Her
At 10/2/20 09:36 PM, Synikal wrote:At 10/2/20 09:34 PM, DrunkGecko wrote:Yeah I'm racist when it tells you not only in my signature but countless reviews how much I love white women.At 10/2/20 09:33 PM, Synikal wrote: i'm not trying to get banned again for asking why lynching is bad, but not when it's white people.so you're a RACIST pedophile. got it
so you're a RETARDED racist pedophile. got it
Notorious internet cunt
My old username was StaticSkull
She/Her
gosh imagine people just having different tastes than you? happens to me all the time, but i don't go telling people they're wrong over it
tired of people who haven't played FE insulting it
i need to go outside more often...
At 10/2/20 09:33 PM, Synikal wrote:At 10/2/20 09:25 PM, TurkeyOnAStick wrote:I would but you're a moderator and we've been down that road and you don't agree with me despite understanding what I stated. Every time I get to to undisputed facts a conversation gets shut down so you have people who have chopped pieces of overall information, but anyone who has actually come to me and seen the link has understood and immediately agreed with me. Because facts are facts and there is even timestamped evidence of how things operate here.Child porn is a joke here anyway and that's been proven and your assumptions debunked. I can link you if you wish.Go on.
Ok: link to me the posts where people have agreed with you.
I'm not trying to get banned again for asking why lynching is bad, but not when it's white people.
.... sticking to whatever it is you’re talking about, I’ve got a big problem with people making false accusations.
At 10/2/20 09:37 PM, WhiteCheddarKasai wrote: gosh imagine people just having different tastes than you? happens to me all the time, but i don't go telling people they're wrong over it
Different taste is one thing, but have you seen how many people submit these posts with no effort at all and bad vocals? I thought Newgrounds was about quality. The other thing that's become more prevalent are people who try to be cool by trying too hard with their creepy weird submissions that say absolutely nothing while trolling as having some deep meaning.
~ All The World's A Stage... and I Choose to Fuck White Girls in the Ass on It ~
At 10/2/20 09:40 PM, TurkeyOnAStick wrote:At 10/2/20 09:33 PM, Synikal wrote:Ok: link to me the posts where people have agreed with you.At 10/2/20 09:25 PM, TurkeyOnAStick wrote:I would but you're a moderator and we've been down that road and you don't agree with me despite understanding what I stated. Every time I get to to undisputed facts a conversation gets shut down so you have people who have chopped pieces of overall information, but anyone who has actually come to me and seen the link has understood and immediately agreed with me. Because facts are facts and there is even timestamped evidence of how things operate here.Child porn is a joke here anyway and that's been proven and your assumptions debunked. I can link you if you wish.Go on.
I'm not trying to get banned again for asking why lynching is bad, but not when it's white people..... sticking to whatever it is you’re talking about, I’ve got a big problem with people making false accusations.
It would literally break the rules for me to publicly link you here. This is why it's been private message only. People in a public space are ignorant and conform to mob mentality and unfunny jokes that detract from making real arguments. Even if I can just isolate one person and have a real conversation with them it at least shows some of the community how inconsistent some ideas are here.
The point about the line with lynching was if something is bad it's bad across the board not selectively bad, but some (that person who replied) clearly aren't able to understand that which may be an explanation as to why we get the nominee pool we get.
~ All The World's A Stage... and I Choose to Fuck White Girls in the Ass on It ~
At 10/2/20 09:45 PM, Synikal wrote:At 10/2/20 09:40 PM, TurkeyOnAStick wrote:It would literally break the rules for me to publicly link you here. This is why it's been private message only. People in a public space are ignorant and conform to mob mentality and unfunny jokes that detract from making real arguments. Even if I can just isolate one person and have a real conversation with them it at least shows some of the community how inconsistent some ideas are here.At 10/2/20 09:33 PM, Synikal wrote:Ok: link to me the posts where people have agreed with you.At 10/2/20 09:25 PM, TurkeyOnAStick wrote:I would but you're a moderator and we've been down that road and you don't agree with me despite understanding what I stated. Every time I get to to undisputed facts a conversation gets shut down so you have people who have chopped pieces of overall information, but anyone who has actually come to me and seen the link has understood and immediately agreed with me. Because facts are facts and there is even timestamped evidence of how things operate here.Child porn is a joke here anyway and that's been proven and your assumptions debunked. I can link you if you wish.Go on.
I'm not trying to get banned again for asking why lynching is bad, but not when it's white people..... sticking to whatever it is you’re talking about, I’ve got a big problem with people making false accusations.
it sounds to me like the link is child porn.
Notorious internet cunt
My old username was StaticSkull
She/Her
At 10/2/20 09:46 PM, DrunkGecko wrote:At 10/2/20 09:45 PM, Synikal wrote:it sounds to me like the link is child porn.At 10/2/20 09:40 PM, TurkeyOnAStick wrote:It would literally break the rules for me to publicly link you here. This is why it's been private message only. People in a public space are ignorant and conform to mob mentality and unfunny jokes that detract from making real arguments. Even if I can just isolate one person and have a real conversation with them it at least shows some of the community how inconsistent some ideas are here.At 10/2/20 09:33 PM, Synikal wrote:Ok: link to me the posts where people have agreed with you.At 10/2/20 09:25 PM, TurkeyOnAStick wrote:I would but you're a moderator and we've been down that road and you don't agree with me despite understanding what I stated. Every time I get to to undisputed facts a conversation gets shut down so you have people who have chopped pieces of overall information, but anyone who has actually come to me and seen the link has understood and immediately agreed with me. Because facts are facts and there is even timestamped evidence of how things operate here.Child porn is a joke here anyway and that's been proven and your assumptions debunked. I can link you if you wish.Go on.
I'm not trying to get banned again for asking why lynching is bad, but not when it's white people..... sticking to whatever it is you’re talking about, I’ve got a big problem with people making false accusations.
.... Dude... the link is clearly a link to something that confirms my point of view on the topic of the matter... so... whatever could that be a link to. Let's think for a minute? Are you taking a good long look at your screen? Now let's take a good long look at the rules. Now you tell me why I can't link it here.
~ All The World's A Stage... and I Choose to Fuck White Girls in the Ass on It ~
At 10/2/20 09:42 PM, Synikal wrote:At 10/2/20 09:37 PM, WhiteCheddarKasai wrote: gosh imagine people just having different tastes than you? happens to me all the time, but i don't go telling people they're wrong over itDifferent taste is one thing, but have you seen how many people submit these posts with no effort at all and bad vocals? I thought Newgrounds was about quality. The other thing that's become more prevalent are people who try to be cool by trying too hard with their creepy weird submissions that say absolutely nothing while trolling as having some deep meaning.
I have seen low/no effort submissions, and I blam them if I think they don't deserve to be in the movie portal. But saying the things in the voting pool are "no effort" is just not correct?
tired of people who haven't played FE insulting it
i need to go outside more often...
At 10/2/20 09:47 PM, Synikal wrote:At 10/2/20 09:46 PM, DrunkGecko wrote:Let's think for a minute?At 10/2/20 09:45 PM, Synikal wrote:it sounds to me like the link is child porn.At 10/2/20 09:40 PM, TurkeyOnAStick wrote:It would literally break the rules for me to publicly link you here. This is why it's been private message only. People in a public space are ignorant and conform to mob mentality and unfunny jokes that detract from making real arguments. Even if I can just isolate one person and have a real conversation with them it at least shows some of the community how inconsistent some ideas are here.At 10/2/20 09:33 PM, Synikal wrote:Ok: link to me the posts where people have agreed with you.At 10/2/20 09:25 PM, TurkeyOnAStick wrote:I would but you're a moderator and we've been down that road and you don't agree with me despite understanding what I stated. Every time I get to to undisputed facts a conversation gets shut down so you have people who have chopped pieces of overall information, but anyone who has actually come to me and seen the link has understood and immediately agreed with me. Because facts are facts and there is even timestamped evidence of how things operate here.Child porn is a joke here anyway and that's been proven and your assumptions debunked. I can link you if you wish.Go on.
I'm not trying to get banned again for asking why lynching is bad, but not when it's white people..... sticking to whatever it is you’re talking about, I’ve got a big problem with people making false accusations.
i dont think you're capable of that
Notorious internet cunt
My old username was StaticSkull
She/Her
At 10/2/20 09:48 PM, WhiteCheddarKasai wrote:At 10/2/20 09:42 PM, Synikal wrote:I have seen low/no effort submissions, and I blam them if I think they don't deserve to be in the movie portal. But saying the things in the voting pool are "no effort" is just not correct?At 10/2/20 09:37 PM, WhiteCheddarKasai wrote: gosh imagine people just having different tastes than you? happens to me all the time, but i don't go telling people they're wrong over itDifferent taste is one thing, but have you seen how many people submit these posts with no effort at all and bad vocals? I thought Newgrounds was about quality. The other thing that's become more prevalent are people who try to be cool by trying too hard with their creepy weird submissions that say absolutely nothing while trolling as having some deep meaning.
How?
Why were these few allowed to be voted so high anyway?
Is it really asking too much that Newgrounds starts up a Quality Committee who's job it is to make sure we never have another month like this again? No.
I had a few conversations in private with users and we agreed it was so hard to decide months ago, but this month... horrible. Why would we as a society ever settle for less? Especially with all the talented artists I know we have here. It's a bigger insult to them!
~ All The World's A Stage... and I Choose to Fuck White Girls in the Ass on It ~
At 10/2/20 09:54 PM, Synikal wrote:At 10/2/20 09:48 PM, WhiteCheddarKasai wrote:How?At 10/2/20 09:42 PM, Synikal wrote:I have seen low/no effort submissions, and I blam them if I think they don't deserve to be in the movie portal. But saying the things in the voting pool are "no effort" is just not correct?At 10/2/20 09:37 PM, WhiteCheddarKasai wrote: gosh imagine people just having different tastes than you? happens to me all the time, but i don't go telling people they're wrong over itDifferent taste is one thing, but have you seen how many people submit these posts with no effort at all and bad vocals? I thought Newgrounds was about quality. The other thing that's become more prevalent are people who try to be cool by trying too hard with their creepy weird submissions that say absolutely nothing while trolling as having some deep meaning.
Why were these few allowed to be voted so high anyway?
Is it really asking too much that Newgrounds starts up a Quality Committee who's job it is to make sure we never have another month like this again? No.
I had a few conversations in private with users and we agreed it was so hard to decide months ago, but this month... horrible. Why would we as a society ever settle for less?
this dude just pulled a "we live in a society"
Notorious internet cunt
My old username was StaticSkull
She/Her
At 10/2/20 09:45 PM, Synikal wrote: It would literally break the rules for me to publicly link you here. This is why it's been private message only.
I’ve literally no idea what you’re talking about.
Regardless of what rule you think you’re breaking (and if there is a rule, I’m going to butt-fuck the Elite Guard Barracks for their gross misconduct!!!) you haven’t been PMing or reporting anything recently.
People in a public space are ignorant and conform to mob mentality and unfunny jokes that detract from making real arguments. Even if I can just isolate one person and have a real conversation with them it at least shows some of the community how inconsistent some ideas are here.
Yes yes, I’m sure you’ll find somebody else who’s clueless about the Among Us Animation Jam in the fullness of time.
The point about the line with lynching was if something is bad it's bad across the board not selectively bad, but some (that person who replied) clearly aren't able to understand that which may be an explanation as to why we get the nominee pool we get.
*takes a long slurp of tea*
Uh-huh.
I'm sorry how the hell is "Lynching" related to "Newgrounds Voting Pool"?
Everyone already knows lynching anyone is wrong, why does this determine the submissions that get voted highly?
tired of people who haven't played FE insulting it
i need to go outside more often...
This thread belongs on 4chan's /b/, not newgrounds. Recommendation: Continue this argument over there.
Oh my god he's STILL fucking talking???
Sig by @Brokendeck
Response to Is This Really The Best We Could Do This Month? 2020-10-02 23:43:55 (edited 2020-10-02 23:48:38)
At 10/2/20 09:27 PM, Synikal wrote:At 10/2/20 03:01 PM, Little-Rena wrote: I just checked all the uploads OP has made to see if they had made anything that could be nominated in a month, and I came across nothing. OP also has a love for porn, so it would make sense that no submissions would meet their needs, as adult submissions are not allowed in the monthy pool.This is not true. I have enjoyed several quality posts especially E Rated. I just would have to really search through my liked content to find it. But I simply want the talented people back.
Well, I look forward to being able to vote for your movie or game submission at the end of this month. I'm sure it'll be better than all of the current talentless hacks round here that get featured!
Edit: also, this post is winning thread of the year for the BBS awards, no contest, because we only reward shit content here on Newgrounds after all!
Also, I pegged OPs mom.
At 10/2/20 11:43 PM, Little-Rena wrote:At 10/2/20 09:27 PM, Synikal wrote:Well, I look forward to being able to vote for your movie or game submission at the end of this month. I'm sure it'll be better than all of the current talentless hacks round here that get featured!At 10/2/20 03:01 PM, Little-Rena wrote: I just checked all the uploads OP has made to see if they had made anything that could be nominated in a month, and I came across nothing. OP also has a love for porn, so it would make sense that no submissions would meet their needs, as adult submissions are not allowed in the monthy pool.This is not true. I have enjoyed several quality posts especially E Rated. I just would have to really search through my liked content to find it. But I simply want the talented people back.
Edit: also, this post is winning thread of the year for the BBS awards, no contest, because we only reward shit content here on Newgrounds after all!
Also, I pegged OPs mom.
You can try actually reading. I stated we have actual talent around here. The issue is the fact that we don't have a Quality Committee to make sure crap doesn't get to sit next to a diamond. That's what I said. I'm embarassed on behalf of the actual talent. Somehow you and others who don't read translate that to everyone sucks. That's not the case.
I know we have better so why don't I see better? And why do so many settle for less and allow such trash to constantly be in this nominee pool?
~ All The World's A Stage... and I Choose to Fuck White Girls in the Ass on It ~
At 10/2/20 10:04 PM, WhiteCheddarKasai wrote: I'm sorry how the hell is "Lynching" related to "Newgrounds Voting Pool"?
Everyone already knows lynching anyone is wrong, why does this determine the submissions that get voted highly?
That was an example of how I was right about the child porn comment. And why I couldn't post that publicly. The original topic also got derailed. I still can't get this community. You people are so unable to read something and understand what's actually being stated. No one is trolling. This community is trolling with some of the things declared as good enough to be nominated for anything great while true talent is not nominated. That's a quality crime.
~ All The World's A Stage... and I Choose to Fuck White Girls in the Ass on It ~
At 10/2/20 09:57 PM, TurkeyOnAStick wrote:At 10/2/20 09:45 PM, Synikal wrote: It would literally break the rules for me to publicly link you here. This is why it's been private message only.I’ve literally no idea what you’re talking about.
Regardless of what rule you think you’re breaking (and if there is a rule, I’m going to butt-fuck the Elite Guard Barracks for their gross misconduct!!!) you haven’t been PMing or reporting anything recently.
People in a public space are ignorant and conform to mob mentality and unfunny jokes that detract from making real arguments. Even if I can just isolate one person and have a real conversation with them it at least shows some of the community how inconsistent some ideas are here.Yes yes, I’m sure you’ll find somebody else who’s clueless about the Among Us Animation Jam in the fullness of time.
*takes a long slurp of tea*
The point about the line with lynching was if something is bad it's bad across the board not selectively bad, but some (that person who replied) clearly aren't able to understand that which may be an explanation as to why we get the nominee pool we get.
Uh-huh.
Fine I'm just going to say it. I can not legally by site rules link another thread that has already been closed. But because everyone keeps bringing up that topic any time I post I have to explain the situation to people unfamiliar so instead of explaining it I simply link them to a thread where they can see the entire discussion if they wish, but I point them to one post only by me and after seeing that post and seeing the proof on the previous pages they conclusively agree that I am in the right entirely. You can't unsee evident proof.
~ All The World's A Stage... and I Choose to Fuck White Girls in the Ass on It ~
Response to Is This Really The Best We Could Do This Month? 2020-10-03 03:07:46 (edited 2020-10-03 03:09:44)
At 10/2/20 10:07 PM, Wegra wrote: Oh my god he's STILL fucking talking???
Yeah look at the people bashing me. All the same faces from the other threads. I was here to talk about Newgrounds and praise the quality of all the artist who have been clearly overlooked. Why wouldn't someone want to argue that the very best should be praised? Give out crap trophies or participation awards on your own time, but don't let some of the amazing work I've seen be in the same category as someone who literally sat on a toilet and videotaped two cardboard cutouts with bad vocals.
Some of the submissions I've voted on in the recent past are so good I've messaged their creators and told them the fact that they aren't on Nickelodeon or something is a crime. We have truly talented people. So there is no excuse for a month like this.
I've even had to explain this to A Rated artist because once you show me you are capable of putting out 5 star material or more so 4.5 star material consistently I hold you to that. So you can't get mad when I call you on it in a review and some understand, some don't. We also really do need an A Rated separate voting pool. It's not fair that they get no attention at all. No one's great work, key word being great, should be devalued because of the rating.
~ All The World's A Stage... and I Choose to Fuck White Girls in the Ass on It ~
At 10/3/20 03:03 AM, Synikal wrote: Fine I'm just going to say it. I can not legally by site rules link another thread that has already been closed.
Link me to the rule where it says this.
(or is that also in a locked thread too and it’s a Catch-22 situation)
But because everyone keeps bringing up that topic any time I post I have to explain the situation to people unfamiliar so instead of explaining it I simply link them to a thread where they can see the entire discussion if they wish, but I point them to one post only by me and after seeing that post and seeing the proof on the previous pages they conclusively agree that I am in the right entirely. You can't unsee evident proof.
*crosses the screen*
You are now blessed to avoid a ban for linking posts from previous threads within the current one.
Hurry up and link this all-enlightening proof.
At 10/3/20 03:09 AM, TurkeyOnAStick wrote:At 10/3/20 03:03 AM, Synikal wrote: Fine I'm just going to say it. I can not legally by site rules link another thread that has already been closed.Link me to the rule where it says this.
(or is that also in a locked thread too and it’s a Catch-22 situation)
But because everyone keeps bringing up that topic any time I post I have to explain the situation to people unfamiliar so instead of explaining it I simply link them to a thread where they can see the entire discussion if they wish, but I point them to one post only by me and after seeing that post and seeing the proof on the previous pages they conclusively agree that I am in the right entirely. You can't unsee evident proof.*crosses the screen*
You are now blessed to avoid a ban for linking posts from previous threads within the current one.
Hurry up and link this all-enlightening proof.
Well given the fact that this thread has a legitimate different conversation going I didn't want it locked for being on that topic again when this is a legitimate gripe with quality and as staff you could at least pass on the idea of a Quality Committee. That's a very fair idea. We clearly can't trust the community around here.
~ All The World's A Stage... and I Choose to Fuck White Girls in the Ass on It ~
Response to Is This Really The Best We Could Do This Month? 2020-10-03 03:17:14 (edited 2020-10-03 03:17:53)
At 10/3/20 03:09 AM, TurkeyOnAStick wrote:At 10/3/20 03:03 AM, Synikal wrote: Fine I'm just going to say it. I can not legally by site rules link another thread that has already been closed.Link me to the rule where it says this.
(or is that also in a locked thread too and it’s a Catch-22 situation)
But because everyone keeps bringing up that topic any time I post I have to explain the situation to people unfamiliar so instead of explaining it I simply link them to a thread where they can see the entire discussion if they wish, but I point them to one post only by me and after seeing that post and seeing the proof on the previous pages they conclusively agree that I am in the right entirely. You can't unsee evident proof.*crosses the screen*
You are now blessed to avoid a ban for linking posts from previous threads within the current one.
Hurry up and link this all-enlightening proof.
Things that might get you banned
That's right there in the rules. Are you seriously waving that? And I feel baited because even when I post it I know the minions are just going to be as blind as they always are. If they can't even see that I'm not saying all artists on the site sucks and that I'm saying separate the quality from the crap, those aren't my target audience anyway.
Seriously, Quality Committee is a great idea for 2021 to officially be implemented.
~ All The World's A Stage... and I Choose to Fuck White Girls in the Ass on It ~
I know this is very likely a very dedicated troll, but why not learn to create your own content? You quite clearly have the time to do so, seeing as it appears you have written at least a couple novels with your reviews. Also, the monthly voting is a time for more sfw content to be in spotlight, as it typically has a harder time getting noticed than A rated stuff.
At 10/3/20 03:12 AM, Synikal wrote:Hurry up and link this all-enlightening proof.Well given the fact that this thread has a legitimate different conversation going I didn't want it locked for being on that topic again when this is a legitimate gripe with quality and as staff you could at least pass on the idea of a Quality Committee. That's a very fair idea. We clearly can't trust the community around here.
Ok then, few things:
-Don’t bring up your paedophilia argument again, since you can’t substantiate it. At all. In this thread or future threads.
-I think a Quality Committee should consist of people who have been highly active for voting in submissions over the past month, as they would have a broad overview of the content.
-I think it’s the site owners’ choice about whether they wish to champion Adult content or not. However, I’m fully aware that scores on Adult content are often high, and are in general evaluated on whether the audience can see tits or not.
Response to Is This Really The Best We Could Do This Month? 2020-10-03 03:42:16 (edited 2020-10-03 03:42:49)
At 10/3/20 03:09 AM, TurkeyOnAStick wrote:At 10/3/20 03:03 AM, Synikal wrote: Fine I'm just going to say it. I can not legally by site rules link another thread that has already been closed.Link me to the rule where it says this.
(or is that also in a locked thread too and it’s a Catch-22 situation)
But because everyone keeps bringing up that topic any time I post I have to explain the situation to people unfamiliar so instead of explaining it I simply link them to a thread where they can see the entire discussion if they wish, but I point them to one post only by me and after seeing that post and seeing the proof on the previous pages they conclusively agree that I am in the right entirely. You can't unsee evident proof.*crosses the screen*
You are now blessed to avoid a ban for linking posts from previous threads within the current one.
Hurry up and link this all-enlightening proof.
Well since you've seen the rule, waved it here and messaged me once more that it is fine to post this link I will, but this link deserves a briefing. I just simply post this and it does nothing but let people look at an entire discussion that's been had so I will simply say this... I want anyone who actually cares to be rational about this and not just scream pedophile at me without actually looking at what I'm saying to read the very next to last post in this thread on page four. My last post in the thread before it was conveniently closed after making such a statement that can not be refuted as evident by just simply looking at the actual content of the post and just watching the Art page on a regular basis with it filtered to A Rated content. I posted a link to something as well and it took the staff several days before it was even deleted and if I hadn't posted it it wouldn't have been.
https://www.newgrounds.com/bbs/topic/1452982/4
There you go. I'm really not interested in anyone who's in the circle of people who are just going to be how they are. This is for the bystanders who don't know any better. There's no reasoning with the community circle who already have their minds made up about things and stick together no matter how nonsensical their stance is. I'm especially not trying to convince the staff as they've already seen said post and well... we saw what happened.
Just ask yourself this one question before replying...
Does consistency matter to you?
~ All The World's A Stage... and I Choose to Fuck White Girls in the Ass on It ~
At 10/3/20 03:42 AM, Synikal wrote: Well since you've seen the rule, waved it here and messaged me once more that it is fine to post this link I will, but this link deserves a briefing. I just simply post this and it does nothing but let people look at an entire discussion that's been had so I will simply say this... I want anyone who actually cares to be rational about this and not just scream pedophile at me without actually looking at what I'm saying to read the very next to last post in this thread on page four. My last post in the thread before it was conveniently closed after making such a statement that can not be refuted as evident by just simply looking at the actual content of the post and just watching the Art page on a regular basis with it filtered to A Rated content. I posted a link to something as well and it took the staff several days before it was even deleted and if I hadn't posted it it wouldn't have been.
Ok.
https://www.newgrounds.com/bbs/topic/1452982/4
(Oh great I have to read the entire thread.)
In that thread you posted a fairly long review about how you would fuck an image with a little girl in it.
You also called me a racist.
I’m well aware you posted a link to something and it got deleted, as I was the one who deleted it.
It took several days because, rather than reporting it like anybody else would do, it was hidden away in one of your forum posts amongst your other walls of text. I only found it when I was re-reading the thread.
There you go. I'm really not interested in anyone who's in the circle of people who are just going to be how they are. This is for the bystanders who don't know any better. There's no reasoning with the community circle who already have their minds made up about things and stick together no matter how nonsensical their stance is. I'm especially not trying to convince the staff as they've already seen said post and well... we saw what happened.
Just ask yourself this one question before replying...
Does consistency matter to you?
What was the thing I said at the end of the thread:
“I’m locking this because I want to draw a line under the drama, like your other threads. I think that’s enough.”
At this point I’m inclined to do the same, so I guess that’s consistent.
While I hesitate to call someone a troll unless they label themselves as one, I do think you’re a waste of time.
