not bad...
it was okay. not brilliant though. i liked the first one better. what you really need are subtitles, and also be more clear on what's going on. that's fine for me, but anybody with an attention span might just get fed up with the confusion playing a game where nobody has a name, and the narrator is hard to make any sense of :/
Awful as a sequel, but not as it's alone
I like the 1st epi. than this, it's more like an FPS & not challenging at all.
But if I don't think that it's a sequel, it's an ok shooting game.
Eh-ish
Yeah dude, the other comments are right, this game isn't bad, but it also good dude. Six because I like the story and you put in hard work, I hope. But I didn't like how they have cross bows..which they didn't...I believe
Good Concept
I understand everyone's complaints about there being no crossbows in the stone age... because there simply isn't much else to talk about. The game was a good idea but overall it doesn't seem finished. Although the it houses a lot of good ideas, they just weren't implemented well. Keep up the good work and i'm sure you'll end up with a hit.
Why WHILST you say whilst????
The story seemed more rushed than the first but still interesting. Every mission was basicly the same.. there was no "knocking one out" ect. It was just "shoot shoot shoot." Maybe if you had it so you shot a branch and made it fall on one of them's head...somethin...
Also, I don't know if your goin for a 2001 feel to it, but it felt like you were trying to hard. Seemed..fake sophisticated. Forced, I guess.. It was prevalent in the writing more so, dispite the awkward structure used to portray the story.
~Sky