At 6/1/12 09:42 PM, pirateplatypus wrote: What's your opinion on the research by the University of Rochester, the University of Essex, England, and the University of California in Santa Barbara suggesting that homophobes are just self-loathing people with unacknowledged homosexual desires?

I think that homophobes are generally nice people that simply fear the unknown (like we all do. We're not afraid of the dark - we're afraid of what's in it)

At 6/1/12 09:49 PM, TwittSoup wrote: istorically, marriage has been all about a man trading his excess labor (labor beyond what is necessary for his own maintenance) for ownership of a woman's reproductive abilities and ownership of their offspring.
Gay marriage has really nothing to do with this sort of contract. In reality this betrays the truth that the economic and contractual advantages of marriage should no longer be allowed to exist.

I am genuinely confused as to which "side" you are on. (It's in quotes for a reason)

Your words say one thing and your pictures say another. Unless you really are ignorant. (I don't see this as a possibility as of yet)

At 6/1/12 09:57 PM, TwittSoup wrote: If you're at a restaurant with your family and you see two men kissing, you'd think it's gross, and try to prevent your kids from looking.

because of people like you

and besides, you'll never see that so shut up and die in a lava pit

At 6/1/12 10:03 PM, TwittSoup wrote:

At 6/1/12 10:01 PM, Xergozy wrote:

and besides, you'll never see that

Excellent

:D

At 6/1/12 09:57 PM, TwittSoup wrote: If you're at a restaurant with your family and you see a male/female couple kissing the table across from you, you wont think twice.
If you're at a restaurant with your family and you see two men kissing, you'd think it's gross, and try to prevent your kids from looking.

contradictory to your previous statement: I wouldn't prevent my kids from looking, nor would I think twice.

black white, yellow, green, gay, straight, bi, transsexual, whatever - we're all people. How does treating someone differently because they're gay differ from treating someone differently because they're black?

At 6/1/12 10:09 PM, TwittSoup wrote: How does treating someone differently because they're a pedophile differ from treating someone differently because they're gay?
They're both sexual preferences that can't be controlled, therefore everybody should be a homo pedo and everyone should accept it.
Enjoy your homo kids and adopted grandkids.

and being a different skin color can't be controlled as well.
You could make the same argument for gay black people. Or straight asian people. Or bi white people.

Every person is different. If everyone was the same, this world would be very, very boring.

So why are you so against being different?

At 6/1/12 10:09 PM, TwittSoup wrote: How does treating someone differently because they're a pedophile differ from treating someone differently because they're gay?
They're both sexual preferences that can't be controlled, therefore everybody should be a homo pedo and everyone should accept it.

Enjoy your homo kids and adopted grandkids.

I'll enjoy them alright. Kids and grandkids would be still mine, and I'd still love them. Sad that you wouldn't.
Also, having gay sex is not a crime (not hurtful to society), having sex with kids is (is hurtful since it may fuck up with kid's developing mind).

Maybe I can scare the bitch away

At 6/1/12 09:57 PM, TwittSoup wrote: If you're at a restaurant with your family and you see two men kissing, you'd think it's gross, and try to prevent your kids from looking.

No actually I wouldn't try to prevent them from looking. In fact, I'd disown my kids if they didn't even have the basic decency to accept others for who they are.

How does treating someone differently because they're a pedophile differ from treating someone differently because they're gay?

Comparing gays to pedos is either a trolling move that has been way over used or the height of stupidity. There is absolutely no credible information to suggest that homosexuals are any more likely to abuse children in a sexual manner than heterosexuals. On top of that, two consenting adults is considerably different than an adult taking advantage of their authority over a child. It's not even the same ballpark, it's a different fucking sport altogether.

At 6/1/12 10:16 PM, Xergozy wrote: Maybe I can scare the bitch away

No, if you really want to scare a bible thumping moron off, show them black Jesus.

At 6/1/12 10:20 PM, TwittSoup wrote:

Twitt, you're arguments are invalid and have been used for generations.

Come up with something new for a change.

At 6/1/12 08:13 PM, K1LL80Y wrote: Stop hating on Christians:
- If god didn't like gays he would get rid of them.
- If someone is dumb because of their faith that's hypocritical if you're also defending gay's, since that's your choice.

Stop hating on gays:
-They were born gay,they don't really choose.
-If they choose to be a flamer, it's their choice, as is yours to find it wrong.
-If they choose to marry, it's their choice and all that.

There's nothing wrong with being christian or gay, I'm both and I like my life.
If god exists i'm sure i'll go to heaven seeing as he's all forgiving and what not.

Now can the whole religion argument be taken out of this? I hate it. :/

Thank goodness someone gets it.

Christians are perfectly fine. What they believe is none of your business as long as they don't go Shirley Phelps on you.

Gays are perfectly fine. They just happened to be born liking what they like. Some people like cheesecake, others don't. Some people like men, others like women. I don't know how this got to be such a huge deal.

Thanks for finally getting it, friend.

At 6/1/12 10:20 PM, TwittSoup wrote: Why are you for pedophilia?

An entire set of arguments and that was the one you chose to attack? (and poorly, I may add)
Pedophilia and homosexuality have nothing to do with eachother. I was using your comparison to indulge you.

In any case, I never stated I was pro pedophilia. I don't have to be pro-something if i'm against the opposite.
You shouldn't lump them together, anyway. Saying i'm not against homosexuality does not mean i'm pro-pedophilia.

I'm sorry, but you're going to have to come up with a better argument than that. That's what I call a "Swiss-cheese argument"

At 6/1/12 10:34 PM, TwittSoup wrote: Your argument is gays are the new blacks and that we should accept them because they're different. Everything different should be accepted, right?

Therefore bestiality, consumption of fecal matter, pedophilia. Anything vulgar and sexual that people enjoy should be accepted and viewed upon by the majority in good graces

never mind the majority of Americans voted against fag marriage

because it's different and therefore not boring.

What's with you and twisting ideals?

Once again, I did not state that I was pro-anything because it was different.
I stated that you were against gay marriage because it was different.

And again: Please don't lump things together that are obviously not related.

At 6/1/12 10:34 PM, TwittSoup wrote: Therefore bestiality, consumption of fecal matter, pedophilia. Anything vulgar and sexual that people enjoy should be accepted and viewed upon by the majority in good graces

Bestiality - technically it's animal abuse.
Pedophilia - kids abuse.
Consumption of fecal matter - ... coprophagia is legal you retard.
BTW, by your logic, if you'd walk around the street with your heterosexual partner, then you're flaunting your sexuality.

inb4 "my sexuality is NORMAL"

Clearly Twittsoup is either trolling or functionally retarded. So I figured I'd take a shot at coming up with retorts that make a little bit more sense than hers.

At 6/1/12 10:30 PM, egg82 wrote: Pedophilia and homosexuality have nothing to do with eachother. I was using your comparison to indulge you.

Actually they do, genitalia. Y'know what? Genitalia are involved in 100% of sexual crimes. Surely that couldn't be a coincidence could it?

In any case, I never stated I was pro pedophilia. I don't have to be pro-something if i'm against the opposite.

"You're either with us or against us." - George W. Bush

You shouldn't lump them together, anyway. Saying i'm not against homosexuality does not mean i'm pro-pedophilia.

Yes, it does. It also implies that you are a member of Al-Qaeda.

I'm sorry, but you're going to have to come up with a better argument than that. That's what I call a "Swiss-cheese argument"

Really? Figures. Leave it to a bleeding heart liberal to insult his fellow socialist scumbags (the Swiss).

At 6/1/12 10:41 PM, TwittSoup wrote: I'm not against gay marriage because it's different. I'm against gay marriage because I've never agreed with homosexuality.

alright, fair enough.

I'm not a facist, trying to force what I believe on others like so many liberals are trying to push gay marriage on a nation that does not want it.
But I'm not going to pretend to my kids, my girl, my family that I'm ohk with these people getting married when I think it's a disgusting sexual practice that should be just that. A sexual practice.

and I disagree. Why do you want to stop their right to marry simply because something they believe something that you don't?

What are you even talking about? The only reason I compared homosexuality to pedophilia is because you compared treating someone different because they're gay to treating someone different because they are black.

because the idea is the same: You're treating them differently because X is different. Is doesn't matter what.

I didn't bring any of that shit in until you said gays are basically the new blacks.

they kinda are, only it's generally more subtle.

At 5/31/12 12:05 PM, GhostOfHalloween wrote: how do you feel about the armin meiwes case then?

i mean the guy WANTED to be slaughtered and eaten... does that make it okay?

Yes, it does make it okay.

At 6/1/12 10:51 PM, TwittSoup wrote: I'm treating pedophiles differently because they're sick fucks. I'm treating gays differently cause they're sick fucks. You're correct.

Nope, i'm done. I can't reason with ignorance.

You're treating gays as if they have some kind of choice on the matter on to marry some girl or not. (implying gays only mean men)

They can't just turn off the attraction/feelings for the same sex... Denying them basic rights that shouldn't even be an issue isn't solving anything and just creates more problems.

relevant

At 6/1/12 10:51 PM, TwittSoup wrote: When gay marriage becomes legal, which it inevitably will despite the will of the American people, I'll try my best--despite the media's love for the homo sex--to keep my kids from it. Just like I'll keep my kids from eating shit, smoking cigs, drinking, and anything else legal but bad for their health.
bad for their health

That one is too rich.
Enlighten me, how is gay sex bad for health? How sucking cocks/munching carpets is bad for your health, o Great Oracle And Voice Of Every Good And Decent American Citizen?

twittsoup going hard

You're comparing children being molested and raped and people eating poop to homosexuals.

That's why we disagree with you, dumbass.

Go have a lot of kids who'll probably turn out gay, and shut up.

At 6/1/12 11:05 PM, TwittSoup wrote: There is no way that an intelligent person can not want gays to marry.

whoops, it seems I need to interrupt one last time.
Averaging out different IQ tests between the last two years; I have an IQ of 142

usually 145 and up is considered a "genius" level IQ, though sometimes it can extend to 140. It really depends on who you ask.

At 6/1/12 11:00 PM, TwittSoup wrote: You're right because I deny pedophiles access to children it creates more problems. They commit illegal acts because it is frowned upon by society, but if they were granted the right to have sex with children then there would be no issues right.

No you idiot, they should be given basic rights, and access to therapy, and chemical castration.
"Access to children" would be institutionalized rape (since kid's can't consent to sex - adult people can).

I'm not claiming to be any of that. The majority of American citizens voted against gay marriage though. If that tells you anything.

That Americans are, at the heart, still the same society that spawned KKK. Yes, it's sad. I'm glad I'm separated by ocean form you.

Look up statistics on gay men and HIV/AIDs. It certainly hasn't benefited them.

Okay. Then, how is sucking a condomed cock/not swallowing bad for your health? Or, for girl, fucking other with a dildo?

You guys are arguing with an idiot.
Just forget his low IQ and don't bother responding, even if it makes you mad.

I don't know how others, but I'm having fun right now. He is so ridiculously dumb/so dedicated troll.

At 6/1/12 11:05 PM, TwittSoup wrote:

you must be secretly gay

This one is stupid ad hominem, I agree. Without any basis in facts. Majority of gay haters are straight, not that it changes anything.

you must not understand them

You said you don't understand why people would do such thing. You fucking said that.

you must be a homophobe

If you hate gays, you're a homophobe. THAT'S THE FUCKING DEFINITION OF THE FUCKING WORD.

At 6/1/12 11:13 PM, TwittSoup wrote: I don't think either of those are right and don't want to see either of those groups married. If gay men must have sex with other men, keep it in the bedroom.

You still didn't reply why the fact that you like girls shouldn't remain in the bedroom.

Why does every child have to accept this? Why does every superhero have to be gay? Soon you'll see a token homo character in every show like you do every token black character. It's not necessary, it just works towards an agenda that most people don't agree with.

Think about something - if most people disagree with it, then WHY DOES THAT HAPPEN?
Maybe you are not majority. Maybe you are just deluding yourself.
Maybe things are changing because society is changing.
Maybe America is one of last strongholds of such thinking, along with some muslim and third world countries.
Think about it.

I'll be that man, just keep your cocksucking tendencies away from myself and my family and don't wish that disease on my children.

Okay, what would you do if your kid would come to you and say "Dad, I'm gay". If your daughter said she has girlfriend, or son he has a bf.
What would you do? I'm curious.

Twitt's trolling, you stupid fucks. Stop giving him attention and he'll go away eventually.

At 6/1/12 11:22 PM, TwittSoup wrote:

Averaging out different IQ tests between the last two years; I have an IQ of 142

usually 145 and up is considered a "genius" level IQ, though sometimes it can extend to 140. It really depends on who you ask.

Mines 133, not impressive but not slow either. What's your point?

IQ PENIS LENGTH BATTLE GO!

A long time ago castrating gays was standard procedure.

A long time ago black slavery and witch hunting was standard, so was war rape. Your point being?
Because my point was, pedophilia is wrong because it involves rape. Homosexuality doesn't.

What about all the other nonKKK spawning countries with bans on homosex marriage?

Gay marriage is not banned, it must be allowed, since it requires changes in the definition of marriage.
Yes, it makes difference. It was not "banned" at some time, it was not yet allowed.

Okay. Then, how is sucking a condomed cock/not swallowing bad for your health? Or, for girl, fucking other with a dildo?

But gays don't do that. They're promiscuous as hell which is why disease spreads in their community so quickly.

Lie. Gays don't have sex more or with more partners than straight people.

If you hate gays, you're a homophobe. THAT'S THE FUCKING DEFINITION OF THE FUCKING WORD.

Well to be honest I don't judge,

You just called them sick fucks and compared them to pedophiles.
Pretty judgemental if you ask me, mister homophobe.

I have a cousin who bounces at a gay club, guy is straight but makes decent profit. Came to his work one day and got hit on at fucking sixteen by males who weren't even drunk. No wonder they're filled with disease, they would hit/hit anything given the chance.

Bullshit. You think a cute girl in regular nightclub wouldn't be hit at? It's a fucking nightclub, people come there to, among others, get a date.

At 6/1/12 05:49 PM, psychopathy wrote:

At 5/31/12 01:30 PM, EmmaVolt wrote: Because its wasting money giving benefits that were designed to encourage procreation.

good lord are all of you christians this insanely retarded

Well let's be honest, marriage is a dead institution at this point anyway and lots of people only get married because of the benefits. No, I don't think gay marriage is an issue. In fact I'm sure a lot of cases involve the couple just wanting the benefits and rights. It's not different than straight couples. If someone wants their marriage to be recognized in the eyes of the law, straight or gay, that's their own affair. But I am just throwing in my two cents that I think marriage isn't what it used to be (high divorce rates, easier ways to get married, etc) so it is odd they're going through so much trouble to get married.