00:00
00:00
Newgrounds Background Image Theme

Fkkkkkkkkk123 just joined the crew!

We need you on the team, too.

Support Newgrounds and get tons of perks for just $2.99!

Create a Free Account and then..

Become a Supporter!

Reviews for "Stop The FCC"

True this game made me want to stop the FCC but since I dont have an acount to make a vote, I cant do anything. One the saddest thing ive seen on the web that is true! :(

klopki responds:

It takes like 2 minutes to make an account, please do it, it'll help us all.
Anyway thank you for your comment and the rating.

Aww... I was so sad when I had to sell my tie... and I have absolutely no idea why I was...

There is probably some metaphor I'm only getting subconsciously there.

It was rather short, and walking left and right doesn't really make a game... I still enjoyed it, but it's not incredible.

klopki responds:

Yeah I agree, the game sucks.
Well, at least you got a red tie!
Oh, wait you sold it... Ohhhh man that's a shame, the only color in the game and you just sold it, wooow.
Seriously though, the red tie has a meaning.

For what it is, it's great.

What are you so afraid of? Camcost? Vernighson? When has there ever been a prohibition against using ACTUAL names of things in a political cartoon? Look at a list of the most famous political cartoons ever and you'll see them unafraid to say "this guy's an asshole" or "this political party is crazy" and to actually spell the guy's name right and the party or trust or whatever it is they're mocking. Why do you need to spell it right? Because I know Camcost is Comcast, but I don't know what or who the hell Vernighson is and I can't look him up because I don't know what it's SUPPOSED to be! Not unless it's as famous as coca cola can you get away with spelling it wrong. And also, no one can sue you for libel if you say something that is true - and if they did sue you for libel, unless it's for commercial purposes of your own (like pillsbury stopped advertising that toaster struedel tastes better than pop tarts - even though it's objectively true - because when it's for commercial purposes, it's different) the burden of proof would be on THEM to prove that what you said was NOT true, because only if they can PROVE it's not true can they call it libel. They can deny it all they want but you see a crime has not been committed if what you say is true so they must prove it isn't. It's only if you want to say something that is decidedly not true that you have to worry about that. Like if I said "FcFonalds puts orphan meat into their tasty hamburgers." That I have to spell wrong. Because it's a provable lie. It's a lie because their hamburgers aren't tasty. BAM! You see what I did there? But EVERYONE knows what I'm talking about. You can have someone oblivious to current events like me who doesn't know what you're talking about and if I want to research the topic, I CAN'T because I don't even know what I'm supposed to look for.

I want my tie back! I sold it for 5 bucks one slice at a time and I was ripped off!

I'm sorry not in the USA...