Hhhmmmmm.....
WHOAH......nice.......w8..does that mean we gona get better in that end time..or we just gona blow up like they said... O.o?!?!
hopefully not though.....BUT IT BE NICE IF WE DID GET SMARTER THAT TIME....PEOPLE GET ALL WORKED UPPED ON THIS WHOLE .."WE ALL GONA GO DIE " thing....but if it IS the point of awakening then..it should.."should"...be fine...THIS WAS GREAT VID MAN XDDD
i heit you
but shit crazed polar bears... you're right
sigh
so, you've started this whole "pseudo-science facts of all living creatures and science is wrong" series and have been at it for a while, huh?
New ones every monday too? I don't know when you started but I'll say that's some effort you're putting in to have had a full month of these.
In terms of actual content, I'm confused.
I don't mean I'm confused because I don't understand it; I mean I'm confused as to how you can honestly take all these sporadic, varied ramblings and think they're all amazing and that they must be shared with the world.
From what you're giving in this, you're a rather cynical person, aren't you? It's completely impossible to have thought that "hairy barbarians" built ancient monuments? Day farmers in Egypt built the pyramids over the course of 25 years. It can't have been that much tougher to work on the Sphinx.
The Bible's stories are nonsensical? Have you read it? It's mostly metaphor or stories told to withhold basic beliefs. To take it at face value or see it for being a mark of its time without thought to the moral behind it is missing the point.
Your sources are already a good standing point for discredit. Edgar Cayce? It's like you're fresh into a college philosophy class and already you think you have life all figured out.
I won't say you probably only do this because you do drugs or are stupid, because you put too much passion into all this shit. What you are, friend, is gullible. You take all this for fact because you so readily believe it yourself, and you're only taking jabs (or should I say, you're only repeating jabs others have taken) at things that can't be easily proven because that's what these sorts of "scientific" theories prey on: lack of evidence or knowledge.
The only reason anyone could believe these "breakthroughs" is because whoever thought of the theory was the first one to stand up and claim to be right. Who's to dispute it? The egyptians believed there was a patron god for every single facet of their lives, which is why out-of-the-ordinary things (which we call "coincidence") happened, according to them. They had no frame of reference where they could say "oh, well it might've just happened to happen;" instead they used the vague term that nobody understood to answer their question: religion.
A disease caused by rust is the Metalwork god's punishment for sloth, an elephant trampling a man is punishment for disrespect to the elephant god. It's not the answer we know today, because today we know better. Today we know that things once easily clumped with other things as "mystery" have rational explanations. The first answer is always the simplest, and the simplest answer is easiest to accept.
You've listed your references, but are they honestly the first things you read on the subject? I hope not. Those books will read that "sources claim" or that "studies show" when in reality they're just paraphrasing other articles with little to no additive value to the writing. They're what you are to the rest of us: a wellspring of bizarre dribble that is going to be taken for more than it is because it's talking about a little-known subject. Do real goddamn research; read on the lives of the authors, other books and works of theirs, interviews with explanation. Your explanations sound straight out of one book for every subject. Just because it's published doesn't mean it's indisputable fact of life or a grand, focused, and intense study into the subject.
Your pseudo-science will have a frame of explanation years from now when we have capability to comprehend.
Until then, stop encouraging children on newgrounds to start smoking weed and attempting astral projection.
I'm giving a 4 for the fact that you're putting one out every week, because I know how painful that can be, minus 1 because the animation is shoddy and clearly only made to qualify it for being a Newgrounds flash instead of just an audio file.
Well, there's tons that i could comment on, but i'll comment on this instead.
The egyptians didn't have gods for every aspect of their lives. What you're talking about are called Neters. There were gods with a lowercase g, not actually gods. Like Anubis for example, there are 42 plus 2 neters. This represents the number of chromosomes in the human body. The purpose of the Neters was actually to teach the transition between the 1st, and 2nd level of consciousness, out of the 3 levels of consciousness that the Egyptians were focused on achieving. Both north egypt, and south egypt had their own sets of 42 and 2 Neters, which created a problem. Over time, these images slowly changed, and when King Menes put the two countries together as a single country called egypt, they also joined all of the images. This created 84 and 4 gods, and the people slowly lost the meaning and understanding, because the kings too, like the people, were dropping in consciousness over hundreds of years.
Ohhh, maybe i do know what i'm talking about after all. Things aren't what they seem at first glance. Maybe i'm not the one who needs to research more ;)
Interesting, though skepticism persists
Though far more interesting than most of what is submitted to the portal, I'm a bit curious about some of the connections drawn between certain examples, such as when the Sphinx's body is brought up with regard to the constellation of Leo. Wouldn't the Sphinx being that old predate the point at which human civilization assigned labels to the constellations? Unless this unconfirmed pre-history civilization happened to use the exact same labels for constellations, this connection seems shaky at best.
The constellations actually hold much more importance to us than as odd formations of stars in the sky. We've also been connected to them for a very long time, the ancient civilizations didn't make up the constellations. We've been using them for many tens of thousands of years now.
Parody of an Web-Magazine site video.
here's my vote = 9/10