I do agree with Venom, closet camping is a fairly large problem in Left4Dead. They also need to make it harder to exploit said "mini finales" As far as I know, in Dead there is 2 for levels 2, and 3. And usually when I'm in co-op and in a finale the first idea I here is "lets go in the closet"
On a side note . . . . .
Fighting 18 Witches is hard work.
At 1/2/09 12:12 AM, VenomKing666 wrote:
yes but my point is that spawn camping isnt a big problem at all in TF2 while Closet camping in L4D is one.
l agree on the TF2 part, but l have to say l never encountered closet campers in my whole L4D "life"...so l guess they are not so many after all...
At 1/2/09 06:22 AM, HeavyTank wrote:
l agree on the TF2 part, but l have to say l never encountered closet campers in my whole L4D "life"...so l guess they are not so many after all...
You saw them but you didnt knew they were.
At 1/2/09 05:23 PM, VenomKing666 wrote:At 1/2/09 06:22 AM, HeavyTank wrote:l agree on the TF2 part, but l have to say l never encountered closet campers in my whole L4D "life"...so l guess they are not so many after all...You saw them but you didnt knew they were.
no, l am pretty sure l never spotted a survivior inside a closet..
At 1/3/09 04:37 AM, HeavyTank wrote:
no, l am pretty sure l never spotted a survivior inside a closet..
You must be blind...
At 1/3/09 04:37 AM, HeavyTank wrote:
no, l am pretty sure l never spotted a survivior inside a closet..
You must be fuking blind because every team or so in NM3 hides in that fucking closet for the elevator crecendo.
Really? Never come across a team who does that, it's pretty easy that one aswell, even on expert.
Only time I see closet campers is on the level where you inside the building (lol) waiting for a helicopter to drop, because it is hard.
At 1/3/09 03:43 PM, VenomKing666 wrote:
You must be fuking blind because every team or so in NM3 hides in that fucking closet for the elevator crecendo.
NM3?What the hell is that?
At 1/4/09 05:42 AM, HeavyTank wrote:At 1/3/09 03:43 PM, VenomKing666 wrote:NM3?What the hell is that?
You must be fuking blind because every team or so in NM3 hides in that fucking closet for the elevator crecendo.
No Mercy 3.
This too will pass.
Memento mori
At 1/4/09 08:31 AM, Lost-Chances wrote:
No Mercy 3.
Oh OK.
And tell me, if closet camping is SOOO bad, why did Valve put closets in the game anyway?
They surely predicted things like this happening...
A building with no rooms would be weird, plus my friend says they are fixing it because he was on verses and the helicopter drop level and said in the building, there was no closet at all.
All though how do they fix corner camping!?!
At 1/5/09 08:55 AM, Obvious-M wrote: All though how do they fix corner camping!?!
Remove corners. I present to you...A circle room.
This too will pass.
Memento mori
At 1/5/09 05:41 AM, HeavyTank wrote:At 1/4/09 08:31 AM, Lost-Chances wrote:Oh OK.
No Mercy 3.
And tell me, if closet camping is SOOO bad, why did Valve put closets in the game anyway?
They surely predicted things like this happening...
It's for Campaign Mode, to find other survivors.
YAH MOTHERFUCKERRRRRRRRRRR
At 1/5/09 03:19 PM, james44445 wrote: Hello.
Can i join the group?
Yes, just post your SteamID or whatever and I will add you.
At 1/5/09 09:12 AM, Lost-Chances wrote:
Remove corners. I present to you...A circle room.
lolz!
Oh and by the way, there is spawn camping, closet camping, corner camping, is there any other type of camping?
At 1/5/09 04:03 PM, VenomKing666 wrote:At 1/5/09 03:19 PM, james44445 wrote: Hello.Yes, just post your SteamID or whatever and I will add you.
Can i join the group?
actually im on xbox live? that cool?
my gamertag is james44445
yay for original
YAH MOTHERFUCKERRRRRRRRRRR
At 1/6/09 02:37 PM, james44445 wrote:
actually im on xbox live? that cool?
my gamertag is james44445
yay for original
they should make a 360/PC port, like in Windows Live..that would bring console and PC player together..now l don't know if that's good or not, but it's definitely worth a try, don't you think?
At 1/6/09 07:02 PM, HeavyTank wrote:At 1/6/09 02:37 PM, james44445 wrote:they should make a 360/PC port, like in Windows Live..that would bring console and PC player together..now l don't know if that's good or not, but it's definitely worth a try, don't you think?
actually im on xbox live? that cool?
my gamertag is james44445
yay for original
Im not paying, NO NO NO! I REFUSE! and the PC players would own the 360 players, simply because the 360 players are limited on controls, mainly movment, they have to deal with how fast the head turns.
At 1/6/09 07:19 PM, ironraven24 wrote: Im not paying, NO NO NO! I REFUSE! and the PC players would own the 360 players, simply because the 360 players are limited on controls, mainly movment, they have to deal with how fast the head turns.
paying FOR WHAT?
This whole thing should be free, obviously..
And by the way, we are talking about co-op.
CO-OP
This isn't TF2, remember?It's Left 4 dead!
And PC players do not own the 360 players in WIndows LIve anyway...
When I went onto live I was given a update for the game, what did it do?
At 1/6/09 07:43 PM, HeavyTank wrote:
paying FOR WHAT?
This whole thing should be free, obviously..
And by the way, we are talking about co-op.
CO-OP
This isn't TF2, remember?It's Left 4 dead!
And PC players do not own the 360 players in WIndows LIve anyway...
Every "windows live" game, (360 port) always costs money to play online, its retarded. ShadowRun is one of them.
At 1/6/09 08:01 PM, ironraven24 wrote:
Every "windows live" game, (360 port) always costs money to play online, its retarded. ShadowRun is one of them.
Oooh yes...but L4D REQUIRES you to have an internet connection if you want to play with other players..and it's free, obviously..l don't see why should someone pay to play online...that's why l am against pay per month MMO's like WoW...
At 1/6/09 08:36 PM, HeavyTank wrote:At 1/6/09 08:01 PM, ironraven24 wrote:Every "windows live" game, (360 port) always costs money to play online, its retarded. ShadowRun is one of them.Oooh yes...but L4D REQUIRES you to have an internet connection if you want to play with other players..and it's free, obviously..l don't see why should someone pay to play online...that's why l am against pay per month MMO's like WoW...
For MMOs it's because it costs a shitton of money to upkeep.
Also what the hell are you talking about exactly ?
At 1/7/09 01:05 AM, VenomKing666 wrote:
For MMOs it's because it costs a shitton of money to upkeep.
It's still too much..with the money they have, Blizzard could develpod 1000 WoW expansion packs and still be rich as hell...
Also what the hell are you talking about exactly ?
You know, games that are based on single player, and they require a payment for you to be able to play multi...
At 1/6/09 07:19 PM, ironraven24 wrote:At 1/6/09 07:02 PM, HeavyTank wrote:Im not paying, NO NO NO! I REFUSE! and the PC players would own the 360 players, simply because the 360 players are limited on controls, mainly movment, they have to deal with how fast the head turns.At 1/6/09 02:37 PM, james44445 wrote:they should make a 360/PC port, like in Windows Live..that would bring console and PC player together..now l don't know if that's good or not, but it's definitely worth a try, don't you think?
actually im on xbox live? that cool?
my gamertag is james44445
yay for original
yes, but you can change sensitivity, and there is a 180 degree turn button.
plus, control are often a lot more complicated on the PC
but yes i think we should have a joint mode.
YAH MOTHERFUCKERRRRRRRRRRR
At 1/7/09 11:25 AM, james44445 wrote:
yes, but you can change sensitivity, and there is a 180 degree turn button.
plus, control are often a lot more complicated on the PC
but yes i think we should have a joint mode.
I have to admit,, the 180 buttons are pure genius for a console. I PC controls may be complex when starting out but, they are much more flexible, dont get me wrong some games are better on consoles but FPS's arent one of those game types that are. Also the common zombie A.I acts a little different in the 360 version ex: zombies attack less from the front, because of the stick limitations.
At 1/7/09 11:25 AM, james44445 wrote:
yes, but you can change sensitivity, and there is a 180 degree turn button.
Well that's clever...
plus, control are often a lot more complicated on the PC
Yes, but PC gamers are used to it
but yes i think we should have a joint mode.
:D
At 1/7/09 11:25 AM, james44445 wrote:
yes, but you can change sensitivity, and there is a 180 degree turn button.
Even with the sensivity it's horrible to aim, especialy from far, and you can bind a key to make you turn of 180° even if it's a little bit tricky, I don,t need it anyway.
plus, control are often a lot more complicated on the PC
No, not at all, it's easier to distinguish controls from a pc than just 4 similar buttons on a controller, at least for me, for Nintendo consoles it's obvious, A is select and B is back etc...
but yes i think we should have a joint mode.
No, not at all, it plays differently, too much differently and PC users would have a big advantage on console users.
MOUSE+KEYBOARD is overpowered.
At 1/8/09 08:57 PM, VenomKing666 wrote: Even with the sensivity it's horrible to aim, especialy from far, and you can bind a key to make you turn of 180° even if it's a little bit tricky, I don,t need it anyway.
wait...you have the game for consoles too?
No, not at all, it's easier to distinguish controls from a pc than just 4 similar buttons on a controller, at least for me, for Nintendo consoles it's obvious, A is select and B is back etc...
No, not at all, it plays differently, too much differently and PC users would have a big advantage on console users.
No they won't...and then, THEY WILL BE ON THE SAME SIDE!It's co-op, damn it!
Yes l know there is VS mode, just ignore that one..
MOUSE+KEYBOARD is overpowered.
bullshit
