Sequels suck usually but sometimes a movie is so good it could use a sequel. Maybe tie up some loose ends in the plot perhaps?

So yeah what movies do you think need a sequel?

Hmmm...Only one to pop in my head is The Incredibles I mean they're a Super Hero Family who are coming out of retirement and no longer shunned by society anymore plus the last movie did leave us with a new villan. I mean christ took us a decade for Toy Story 3!

SILENT HILL!

Sequels are fine as long as they are done well. I think sequels water down what was special about the original.

Not really a sequel, but they so need to remake the Weird Science movie, with modern multimedia.

Buffy the Vampire Slayer should have a sequel.

And "There's something about Annie too."

SAW!! Just kidding.
Pixar don't make sequel. I think The Lord of the Rings must have released "Hobbit" like the book, but I think Simpsons need a new movie.

Where the fuck is my Big Damn Sequel, Joss?

The Matrix.

James Bond

Sherlock Holmes

The first one is always better than the second. That's the way I see it. Some movies should just stay the way it is and no sequel added. Like Transformers for example, the first one was just great! Now they are making a trilogy and now it sucks. Let me not forget Hangover. I loved the first one but does it really need a sequel? The sequel basically look just like the first one. *sigh* But the only reason they do this because when it becomes a success they make a trilogy for the money. Let all good movies be ruined with sequels and prequels.

Big Trouble in Little China

At 4/28/11 06:55 PM, SneakyGameBoy wrote: The first one is always better than the second. That's the way I see it.

Aliens
Terminator 2
Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade
Dawn of the Dead
The Dark Knight
Army of Darkness
Wrath of Khan
X-Men 2
Empire Strikes Back
For A Few Dollars More (or The Good, The Bad and The Ugly. Both are better than Fistful, For A Few Dollars More is better than TGTBATU)
The Godfather Part 2

Yep, I guess sequels are always shit, then.

American History X.
And possibly Scarface, but I would be frightened to touch such a masterpiece.

The Keep

At 4/28/11 07:04 PM, TheMaster wrote:

At 4/28/11 06:55 PM, SneakyGameBoy wrote: The first one is always better than the second. That's the way I see it.

Aliens
Terminator 2
Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade
Dawn of the Dead
The Dark Knight
Army of Darkness
Wrath of Khan
X-Men 2
Empire Strikes Back
For A Few Dollars More (or The Good, The Bad and The Ugly. Both are better than Fistful, For A Few Dollars More is better than TGTBATU)
The Godfather Part 2

Yep, I guess sequels are always shit, then.

Maybe you didn't read my whole post and only read that sentence so I guess I have to tell you the other half I said "SOME movies should just stay the way it is and no sequel added." See right there? I said SOME I didn't mean every single movie and classics. -___-

At 4/28/11 07:04 PM, TheMaster wrote:

At 4/28/11 06:55 PM, SneakyGameBoy wrote:

The Godfather Part 2

Dude, there is already a godfather part 3! It came out in the 90's!

A Nightmare on Elm Street. Actually, no.. They should just remake the original masterpiece, and dumb it down all the while making Freddy look like a deep fried Kevin Bacon.

Wait, they did that.

Hellraiser, but let's remake that one instead of giving it more sequels, and let's make it shitty with modern day CGI and ruin another masterpiece.

And then we can continue making SCREAM movies and ruining the original movie which was a masterpiece, just so we can make more money and please modern day teenagers who want to see a dumbed down shit 'slasher' movie which has incredible potential, but won't ever live to it.

And then we can remake Halloween and do a good job on the first remake, and then make a dumbed down half assed sequel to that because we're Rob Zombie and only made the sequel to the remake because we feel we NEED to do it...

And then we'll remake Child's Play because we want to ruin another masterpiece, we are Hollywood and this is what we do because we're too fucking stupid to think of anything that hasn't been done before.

But to answer your question, give A Serbian Film a sequel, as well as Clive Barker's Nightbreed.

At 4/28/11 06:57 PM, IncendiaryProduction wrote: Serious answer: Full Metal Jacket.

I hated the ending. It didn't tie up the story at all.

For real? It's not really supposed to be a satisfying ending. War is a world of shit and all you can do is move on to the next battle. I mean, you're free not to like it, but at least recognize that it's the way the Kubrick. Personally I think that's the only way it could have ended. Would you have preferred one of those montages where you get a still of all the characters and a little bio on what they went on to do?

Also let's get that History of the World sequel. Mel Brooks has maybe two years left. Three tops.

At 4/28/11 07:10 PM, IncendiaryProduction wrote:

At 4/28/11 07:08 PM, MotokoFan wrote:

At 4/28/11 07:04 PM, TheMaster wrote:

You misunderstood.

Someone said that sequels always suck. He then listed some awesome sequels.

Oh okay, I feel really retarded now.
:(

Titanic.
They could call it Titanic 2!

At 4/28/11 07:17 PM, FirstBaby wrote: Titanic.
They could call it Titanic 2!

If they made a second one, it better be Titanic 14!

well, americans failed at vietnam, and he likes to think when militaries tread on other peoples countries/build bases there-set up drone operations that kill 90% innocent civilians. that the people there only have a problem with it because of "religion" "just want to fight"

Super Mario Brothers Movie.

Apart from superhero movies and horror franchises, I don't think any movie REALLY needs a sequel.

At 4/28/11 06:54 PM, TheMaster wrote: Where the fuck is my Big Damn Sequel, Joss?

Considering Avengers is looking badass, sorry. Besides, how could they have another movie without Brook and Wash?

I personally would love to see a Sin City sequel. I know they've been kicking around the idea, but so far, nothing yet. It's not like the material's not there.....

clerks 3

At 4/28/11 08:27 PM, SCTE3 wrote:

At 4/28/11 07:22 PM, Warforger wrote: Super Mario Brothers Movie.

Get better actors and make the story more closely related to the games and you have potential to have a winning movie and a redemption for the first Super Mario Movie.

So what, you just want guy running to the right for a hour and a half. Maybe the games have a little more back story now, but I think it's amazing that the filmmakers came up with anything coherent considering the source material.

Since we're talking about Pixar, Monsters Inc.

At 4/28/11 08:25 PM, klik wrote: clerks 3

Nah, Clerks 2 was a nice ending. No need to go further than that. Smith is done with movies once he's made Hit Somebody anyway, SModcast Internet Radio from here on in.

At 4/28/11 08:25 PM, klik wrote: clerks 3

A third Clerks movie would be awful, I don't wanna see a 40 year old Dante raising a child and still working in the Quick Stop.