Strange thing to ask, but I was looking at this piece and, horrible awe and depression aside, I noticed that the person who made it doesn't seem to know very much about the character that she spent 410 hours pixellating. Being a horrendous geek, I wanted to write a review pointing out inconsistencies about what she says/depicts, but I decided against it because I have no actual technical criticism to offer and would end up just geeking out a bit and then praising the thing. I was wondering, though, what you guys think:
How bad is it to make a review based on the idea behind a piece or of the author instead of on the actual image?