Back to posting abusive reviews!
At 11/24/07 03:28 PM, zombiemassacre wrote: This is hateful.
no it isn't and just to prove it:
"Congratulations! Your vote was the last vote needed for this submission to be protected!
Thanks for voting, Cheekyvincent! Your experience points have already been deposited for today - thanks for doing the overtime!
Your experience gave you a voting power of 5.93 votes. Your blam and protection points gave you an additional 26% of your experience power, meaning that your total vote power was worth 7.47 votes!
The more experience points you have, combined with BLAM and PROTECTION points, the more your vote is worth!"
that wasn't really hateful- the definition of hateful (or so i think) is racism, ageism, sexism etc. if you said that was hateful, TONNES of stuff would be: such as V-Tech Rampage etc.
HOLY FUCKING SHIT! I FOUND THE LIST OF WI/HT SPAMMERS ITS HERE- if you are angry, PM me! (:
"The Wi/Ht forum is now a post count +1 shit hole. Do you agree?"- Join the Debate
I believe this is stolen:
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/41 1891
It looks like they imported it, removed the website tags, and slapped the winter preloader on the front. (Plus it has that "powered by sothink" tag blinking in the corner, which raises suspicion...
At 11/24/07 03:53 PM, bicostp wrote: I believe this is stolen:
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/41 1891
Everything powered by sothink is stolen
Steam: Bstuk
Oh no! Hes back.
If you see any flash submission with a description like "ajkhfdkzjhdkajnz" it is stolen
Steam: Bstuk
At 11/24/07 03:58 PM, Bstuk2 wrote:At 11/24/07 03:53 PM, bicostp wrote: I believe this is stolen:Everything powered by sothink is stolen
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/41 1891
No it isn't.
I'm your average Afro-American fetus. For example: I enjoy basketball, I'm rather good when I play too, but I'm much too busy scratching my horrific cracked skin these days.
At 11/24/07 04:01 PM, life wrote:At 11/24/07 03:58 PM, Bstuk2 wrote:No it isn't.At 11/24/07 03:53 PM, bicostp wrote: I believe this is stolen:Everything powered by sothink is stolen
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/41 1891
I meant submitted by that guy. But, his newest submission in the portal isnt stolen, its just really bad.
Steam: Bstuk
At 11/24/07 04:01 PM, life wrote: No it isn't.
YAY! another loss of whistle points :) CONGRATULATIONS!
HOLY FUCKING SHIT! I FOUND THE LIST OF WI/HT SPAMMERS ITS HERE- if you are angry, PM me! (:
"The Wi/Ht forum is now a post count +1 shit hole. Do you agree?"- Join the Debate
At 11/24/07 04:10 PM, Cheekyvincent wrote:At 11/24/07 04:01 PM, life wrote: No it isn't.YAY! another loss of whistle points :) CONGRATULATIONS!
Nope, no one lost any whistle points.
Steam: Bstuk
At 11/24/07 04:39 PM, Bstuk2 wrote:At 11/24/07 04:10 PM, Cheekyvincent wrote:Nope, no one lost any whistle points.At 11/24/07 04:01 PM, life wrote: No it isn't.YAY! another loss of whistle points :) CONGRATULATIONS!
good cuz i flagged it :-)
.
At 11/24/07 04:42 PM, BIGmamaKATIE wrote:At 11/24/07 04:39 PM, Bstuk2 wrote:good cuz i flagged it :-)At 11/24/07 04:10 PM, Cheekyvincent wrote:Nope, no one lost any whistle points.At 11/24/07 04:01 PM, life wrote: No it isn't.YAY! another loss of whistle points :) CONGRATULATIONS!
Same ;).
-GoD
At 11/24/07 04:53 PM, jokerscard wrote: Seeing as almost nobody has bothered to find abusive reviews, I take this as a example of the trust lost in the mods and the system.
pretty much..
.
Meh. I'm just scouting for them now.. Since I am sketchy with reporting old reviews, I have to filter them to be 2007/2006. I posted a few above your post, and some before that
At 11/24/07 04:56 PM, LongliveACDC wrote: Since I am sketchy with reporting old reviews, I have to filter them to be 2007/2006.
Why? Older reviews that are abusive are still deleted.
Really?
I heard that grandfathered reviews get taken into special account (by multiple sources).
But you know the most. Thanks!
At 11/24/07 05:00 PM, absent wrote:At 11/24/07 04:56 PM, LongliveACDC wrote: Since I am sketchy with reporting old reviews, I have to filter them to be 2007/2006.Why? Older reviews that are abusive are still deleted.
even abusive reviews writen in like 2001 - 02 or something..?
.
At 11/24/07 05:00 PM, absent wrote:At 11/24/07 04:56 PM, LongliveACDC wrote: Since I am sketchy with reporting old reviews, I have to filter them to be 2007/2006.Why? Older reviews that are abusive are still deleted.
There's a date where you can't (or shouldn't) delete though isn't there? I saw a post by Liljim (I think it was him) that said that old reviews (old, old reviews) shouldn't be deleted.
-GOD
-GoD
I can't post a whole lot of abusive reveiws, because im afraid that IE will stip responding, and Ill have to shut it down. But heres a few.
I use goolge to find these
http://cadd5.newgrounds.com/reviews/flas h - all the negative ones, because they all say blam
http://kurt-1.newgrounds.com/reviews/fla sh/10 - first one
http://briantideman9.newgrounds.com/revi ews/flash/5 - the one by his B/P rank
http://chaoslight.newgrounds.com/reviews /flash/5 - first one
http://old-tobunshi.newgrounds.com/revie ws/flash/3 - second to last
Steam: Bstuk
At 11/24/07 05:05 PM, Greth-of-destruction wrote: There's a date where you can't (or shouldn't) delete though isn't there?
Nope. All reviews that are abusive can and should be deleted.
I saw a post by Liljim (I think it was him) that said that old reviews (old, old reviews) shouldn't be deleted.
You may have seen a fairly old post which is related to something different. Obviously, users won't be banned for old reviews, but that doesn't mean old reviews cannot be deleted.
-GoD
.
sorry I wasn't here in the past few days I was taking a break
so here is a coming back present Oxygenwaster201
At 11/24/07 05:24 PM, RKThrilla wrote:At 11/24/07 05:19 PM, Greth-of-destruction wrote: Forced DJ and Kidray76 are on google! XDwe actually all are, if u search your user name your more then likely to find multiple things about you
LINK!
-GOD
I know, but I found them under "abusive reviews". Heh.
-GOD
-GoD
At 11/24/07 05:38 PM, 95wave wrote: so here is a coming back present Oxygenwaster201
looks like it already got deleted :(
but, seriously this IS a goldmine! CHECK ALL PAGES!!!
.
At 11/24/07 05:17 PM, absent wrote: Nope. All reviews that are abusive can and should be deleted.
You may have seen a fairly old post which is related to something different. Obviously, users won't be banned for old reviews, but that doesn't mean old reviews cannot be deleted.
I think that the post was like '04 '05 news... Oh well, sorry everyone. Go for those '01s!
-GoD
At 11/24/07 05:14 PM, RKThrilla wrote:
hey yall google is a great way to find them, look up
No, no, no. Try searching in this:
blam site:http://newgrounds.com/reviews/
You can always edit out blam with another word
Heres the URL
Thats how I found the reveiws above.
Steam: Bstuk
