At 2/22/08 04:00 AM, gfoxcook wrote:
At 2/21/08 09:35 AM, kidray76 wrote:
At 2/21/08 03:05 AM, gfoxcook wrote:
At 2/20/08 04:51 PM, kidray76 wrote:
At 2/20/08 04:02 PM, yoshi77777 wrote:
At 2/20/08 03:51 PM, SBB wrote:
At 2/20/08 03:47 PM, yoshi77777 wrote:
I'm just saying that for years as a review mod, I moderated idiots who thought they could get away with being abusive by ONLY being abusive to movies that were UJ and would probably be blammed.
That hasn't changed. If it is found that someone intentionally leaves a horrendous review because they think it will be blammed anyway, that is the against the rules on the basis of not putting effort and deliberately insutling the author. However, don't know about the other mods, I feel UJ reviews should be left alone till it passes judgement. Seems unfair to ban someone for a review for a non existant flash in the portal.
Second paragraph
Ugh, no comment. Being a former review mod, you know why.
People shouldn't get away with breaking the rules just because the movies/authors they're attacking end up in the graveyard. Agreed? Or no? If not, why?
I don't disagree, but at the same time, one of those things can't do anything about. If a flash is blammed, the reviews are deleted, and left there forever. Besides, we do need the ability to delete reviews in the obt, why revive the dead? What would happen people are gonna go back, and start flagging reviews back in 20 _ _ and create more unneccessary work. Got enough on our hands just for the pass flashed reviews.
It's like, you spray paint a building, and the building ends up burning down in the next 2 minutes. So now that the building is gone, does it matter that you spray painted it?
