Gretings fellow overfiends and commanders,
I have two points.
1.) There's one thing we should try to keep to a minimum, it's rather annoying (Atleast in my opinion). I know every commander has a certain ego level and thinks his army is the best. Fine by me, but keep it out of this BBS for now.
Posts like:"OMFG! I liek teh Tyarnids. They ownz. You all suk! Especcially u gaurdmen!"
(I've only taken a Tyranid player as example, PLEASE DO NOT FEEL OFFENDED 'NID PLAYERS! I respect every army as a good commander should. Except for Squats. 'Nuff said.)
Perhaps if you put some trace of the army(ies) that you play in your signature, it would be better.
2.) Also, the group should not be dependant on one leader, commander, hive mind or Warboss. As said before, three of four 'leaders' would be much more ideal. This could also include the aide or scribe who keeps track with the members thus far. See it as a sort of council. I'll throw myself in as a councilmember. (There's always room for a Imperial Guards lieutenant between the traitors and xeno's!)
That was all,
For the Emperor, For Cadia and for Honour!