At 8/14/16 09:03 AM, gamejunkie wrote:
At 8/14/16 08:47 AM, Asandir wrote:
Well I could have done that hours ago but I figured they were 2 easy Blam points, so I left them. I suggest you re-publish them so we still can get them. Sometimes it doesn't pay to be so quick on the trigger there dude.
At 8/14/16 05:11 AM, LexaHergon wrote:
Same as my previous report :Taken those off, thanks for the report.
lazy post is lazy
Taking into account that both of these submissions had links to actually malicious websites, I thought taking them off was the better option. You know, protecting the userbase from getting scammed or getting their computers infected. But yeah, those so, so important blam points surely should have been a priority. Like totally.
I sincerely hope your'e joking here because your insistence on keeping rule breaking, malicous content up to gain more blam points is legitimately unsettling. I 100% disagree with your suggestion of re-publishign them to gain blam points. Give me a break, really.