Uncyclopedia Hates Us
Play my epic RPG - The Awakening - and your life will change forever!
... but I'm legally obligated not to say that.
"If you don't mind smelling like peanut butter for two or three days, peanut butter is darn good shaving cream.
" - Barry Goldwater.
Hate ?
Whoever wrote all that garbage is more obsessed with NG then NGers...
I've never even heard of them before so take that uncyclopedia.
At 2/22/11 11:49 PM, Warforger wrote: That article is years old......
This. It was before the redesign, but it is somewhat accurate in many aspects.
Why did I read all of that... Uncyclopedia is about as funny as anal rape.
Like a Khan.
that's not an official uncyclopedia page though.
No big deal. Encyclopedia Dramatica hates us too, but it's still funny.
Uncyclopedia is Encyclopedia Dramatica for babbies.
I really don't care at all about Uncyclopedia, and I much prefer Encyclopædia Dramatica as it seems to be a lot funnier, original, and more risque.
In fact, that was actually the second Uncyclopedia article I've ever seen
This article hurt my feeling. Slander I tell you! ALL SLANDER!
"Plz don't call NASA on me I'm afraid of astronauts dude" - DJ-Ri (2015)
Uncyclopedia is a website that tells everything the oppositely. (They said 4chan was good), so actually, they like us.
[PSN/Steam- Airbourne238]
Uncyclopedia is funny if you like Oscar Wilde.
Actually they do have some funny articles.
[I've been wandering round but I still come back to you]
I Know Drugs, I Know Video Games, I Know Litliture, I Know Dru- wait...nevermind. Feel free to discuss any of these with me
I think the one good page on that site is the jimi Hendrix page
Weren't these articles developed by butthurt asswipes who were banned from websites or something?
That article is really old, it's not on the actual uncyclopedia anymore.
Also, ED is so much funnier, because stealing all your humor from 4chan makes you totally original and shock porn doesn't get boring at all after the first 9 pages. Not at all.
I'm not sure if that was supposed to be funny or not, but the only thing I found remotely humorous was this
There is nothing funnier than editing Bedn into a picture.
I remember when that was true.
bro at me come
Newgrounds is also widely known for the overabundant originality and maturity of its userbase; never will a user tell another user to fixt is falsh, out of courteousness. The BBS is filled with helpful +18 users who will gladly have a look at your Ashkinscript and fix it for you, free of charge.
Never before have truer words been spoken.
Voters must text either 1, F, 3, The Batman Symbol, 8, or 5 on their cellular telephones in order to vote.
That's an idea for the next update.
Experience points are used to get to the next level and to gain new magicka such as bio 2 and blammaga.
Got that, admins?
Uncyclopedia>> ED
RubberJournal: READY DOESN'T EVEN BEGIN TO DESCRIBE IT!
Mathematics club: we have beer and exponentials.
Cartoon club: Cause Toons>> Charlie Sheen+Raptor
Uh-huh. It's not informative, and it's not funny. I've got Wikipedia and a host of stand-up comedians to supply both fronts (in that order) so this article, this sarcastic-fuck-all website hurt mah feelings about as much as... it didn't.
Besides, stop caring what the Internet thinks of this website. The internet doesn't like anybody.
Uncyclopedia is just a parody of Wikipedia. If you want real hate then go to Encyclopedia Dramatica.
It's just gotten to the fact the that either you love us, or go to gaia.
Funny. I read the article and it actually praises the BBS. As for the rest of it, well it doesn't appear to be any kind of butt hurt, more like jelly piss take/trollin'.
Roleplaying is to the mind what masturbation is to the body - Shalashaska-1, 2008
Feel free to MSN me: warsmithdave@msn.com
Beware the NGSkeletonGimp! M:tG Klub.
ITT: People who dont realise that Uncyclopdia aims to misinform people and is a parody of Wikipedia, essentially being the opposite.
It's not a terrible article, there are a few lines that are kind of funny in theory, but they're written in a way that blanches all the humor out of it. The article has humor anemia and it seems like somebody wrote it out in one sitting and decided to leave it like that. It was kind of funny when they used the old school house rock song to describe the voting process in the portal.
If a flash is by chance not eaten by P-Bot, it becomes a bill and is then passed on to capital hill.
Which, while kind of clever, it's written in a way that doesn't allude to the song very well so the author decides to explain it
Like, if you've ever seen that one School House rock, with the talking bill on the steps of Capital Hill, it's just like that.
Seriously? If you need to explain the joke you just made you dun goofed.
So yeah, that's way more academic of an analysis than this probably deserved when all I could have said was, "this needs a few revisions," but there you go.
Where's that confounded bridge?
At 2/23/11 12:10 AM, Gagsy wrote: Actually they do have some funny articles.
They're alright in small doses but damn, looking back at Uncyclopedia now, it feels so watered down after reading so much from ED. As for NG articles from both sites, I don't think either of them have been updated for a while now.
But I love Uncyclopedia...
BTW the page I saw before, hilarious.
But newgroudsf is still awesomesss
