BASS TURD!!!!
I.Q. 143 . and im supposedly a literacy style learner . i cant say wether the first one was accurate but the second one is a blatant lie!!! i learn with vids not books >_>
Reviews for "IQTester"
DemiseAnimation responds:
Haha! That style of learner doesn't mean you need books, only that you are good at interpreting words!
Congratulations on the score and thanks for the review
i am the MAN!
haha, randomly clicked every answer in lightspeed without watchin anything and i got 160. i guess that was some epic lucky answering. is speed relevant to this?
DemiseAnimation responds:
Liar >:(
133...
this game was fun to play but i have the strange feeling that it is too easy to get a top score result. english is not my mother tongue (excuse my abillities) and some of the more demandig words i had to look up at google translator and nevertheless i got an iq that is by far over the average of 100. and I´m not the only one considering the other comments. maybe you should increase the difficulty for getting top scores or simply decrease the amount of points gained for correct answers. and is the time that you need for completing the test a criterion?
DemiseAnimation responds:
Congratulations on your result, ill be updating it later.
I don't bellieve this is very accurate...
...since most people are getting results over 130 as an average. My result was pretty accurate (considering the average of like 13 other tests I've taken) but more thorough tests are needed to get an accurate result. I suggest you encourage people to perform real tests like MENSA's in the description of this submission :) Otherwise I think this is a really neat little program, fit as an app for an iPhone or similar.
139. My first IQ test told me I was 132. And that was on some medical site. Pretty accurate.