Um...
Did anyone who gave this game a good review actually play it for very long?
Let me just explain this.
First of all, its only the demo. So what, in my opinion, would be a decent part of the game - the "free" (unlimited) mode, is cut out.
Second, the sound is terrible - just blings and bloings and "YOU WIN."
Also, the puzzle mode has virtually no levels, all of which are EXCRUTIATINGLY easy. I myself did not read any instructions whatsoever, and still beat them all after 1 or 2 tries.
The main mode in which one follows Dr. Rose is interesting. Not the gameplay, but the fact that I found it impossible to lose even if I tried. Can you lose at that? Seriously, is it physically possible to lose?
Considering this game is labelled as a puzzle game, I expected a challenge. Most puzzle games require thought, but in this game I didn't understand what I was doing (to start with) and still won every time. I mean, sandbox games are fun, sure, but they can't be called puzzle games. If one were to click at random inside the gameplay area, chances are they'd win.
In addition to this, the claim that this game has original gameplay is completely unadulterated and falsified. This is a paltry remake of some of the internets most beloved games. The claim that this is an innovative way to combine 3 colours is, dare I say, complete balogna. No matter how you put it, there's only around 6 mathematical ways to combine 2 colours together, when there is 3 in total.
Moreover, what does this have to do with DNA? The proteins (which do not in any way represent what proteins look like) involve no nucleic structure - how can 2 proteins combine and make a cell? This is idiotic thinking at best, as even grade 10 science students could tell anyone. Where are the nucleotides, the codons, the genes, the chromosomes? Even though this does not affect the gameplay, one could easily think of a better title.
I have to admit, however, that the graphics were quite good; however, one could argue that the graphics to many blammed games were on par or better than this game.
I fail to realize how a game with no direct focus, no replay value, and no extraordinary or original features could get such a high score. Especially a money-monger like this one.