Fun! but the download version is way better
I really liked this game, but people don't realize its a FLASH DEMO of a DOWNLOADABLE GAME.... the full verision (which I tried) was way better, longer, had music, more intense, more interesting, fun shapes, a story to go along with it... still I see what they're trying to do here... gives a quick taste to make you d/l the trial version which gives you a better taste so you buy it.... i didnt buy it, but it was way more fun d/ling it
can't lose
good news: good graphics
bad news: boring, highly repettitive, beyond easy(don't even bother to read the instructions, they're not needed), no relation to dna, create same flower each time, CANNOT LOSE!!! EVER!!!!
seriously, i did everything i could to on purposely to lose and I COULD NOT!!!!! where is the challange if you cannot lose?
suggestions: allow people who screw up to lose
different colors create different flowers
more than 3 colors
make it harder to get high point "chain reactions"
background music
more than 3 or 4 sounds
you have a good START but you have a long way to go to make a good GAME.
Um...
Did anyone who gave this game a good review actually play it for very long?
Let me just explain this.
First of all, its only the demo. So what, in my opinion, would be a decent part of the game - the "free" (unlimited) mode, is cut out.
Second, the sound is terrible - just blings and bloings and "YOU WIN."
Also, the puzzle mode has virtually no levels, all of which are EXCRUTIATINGLY easy. I myself did not read any instructions whatsoever, and still beat them all after 1 or 2 tries.
The main mode in which one follows Dr. Rose is interesting. Not the gameplay, but the fact that I found it impossible to lose even if I tried. Can you lose at that? Seriously, is it physically possible to lose?
Considering this game is labelled as a puzzle game, I expected a challenge. Most puzzle games require thought, but in this game I didn't understand what I was doing (to start with) and still won every time. I mean, sandbox games are fun, sure, but they can't be called puzzle games. If one were to click at random inside the gameplay area, chances are they'd win.
In addition to this, the claim that this game has original gameplay is completely unadulterated and falsified. This is a paltry remake of some of the internets most beloved games. The claim that this is an innovative way to combine 3 colours is, dare I say, complete balogna. No matter how you put it, there's only around 6 mathematical ways to combine 2 colours together, when there is 3 in total.
Moreover, what does this have to do with DNA? The proteins (which do not in any way represent what proteins look like) involve no nucleic structure - how can 2 proteins combine and make a cell? This is idiotic thinking at best, as even grade 10 science students could tell anyone. Where are the nucleotides, the codons, the genes, the chromosomes? Even though this does not affect the gameplay, one could easily think of a better title.
I have to admit, however, that the graphics were quite good; however, one could argue that the graphics to many blammed games were on par or better than this game.
I fail to realize how a game with no direct focus, no replay value, and no extraordinary or original features could get such a high score. Especially a money-monger like this one.
Not the best.
I've seen better. It was fun at first, but it got boring. Oh well. Fairly good game, anyway.
eh
Yeah man sry but it was just a little to slow and a little to sucky. I mean you could of had something but u farted out this.