Well its not very original.
Its like any other shooting game. But i like the idea of killing sharks .But this game is meant to be funny and i dont thing its funny that youer evenging a real person who really died.
Reviews for "Terri Irwin's REVENGE"
altr responds:
I don't remember anyone saying this was supose to be funny. You might want to read some of my other responces.
Also, WHO HACKED THE GAME AND PUT SHARKS IN? I'LL GET YOU YOU BASTARDS!!
Ok so here
I admit...I don't see anything funny in the death of steve irwin, However I did play the game. I am not gonna make an opinion on a game with out playing the game. I was reading all the reviews and ppl said they didn't play the game and they hated it. YOU CANT give a proper review that way. That's why it's called a REVIEW. I'm sorry to sound like an ass to some ppl but you just can't make a byast review based on yer own moral standing without actually seeing what the game is about. That's like saying you think a movie sux before you see it.
I will admit the context of the game is a bit wrong. It's basicly based off of the death of steve irwin, but also keep in mind he could have done worse like made a game where you are the stingray and you go and kill steves family and friends.
Ok so I am a bit disturbed that this flash and feel it is moraly wrong however I had to see what it was about. I don't know he was really pokeing fun at steve irwin or makeing a tribute thing. I can't tell you I am not the creator of the flash. Or maybe the artist was in for shock value. Everyone does that these daysI know lots of ppl that just do shit for shock value.
Personally I think that steve and his family should be left alone. Sure he was a celebraty and a great man and should be rememberd. But I don't think he'd like this game. Mainly because it goes against all he believes. He loved animals and I don't think him or terry would go off killing them. He died doing what he loved. I think everyone should be as lucky. No I am not saying he's lucky he died I am simply saying he died doing what he loved. It's better than dieing alone in yer sleep quitely in my opinion. Honestly I don't think he or his family blames the stingray eather they love animal and all of them know the dangers the animal was just acting on instinct you can't expect animals to have reason like human beings. I am sure if they knew which stingray it was the athourities would kill it cuz that's how humans work. But you can't expect the animal to know better.
Now for the actuall game play it'self
Typical side scrolling shooter nothing too intresting here.
Croc-bombs were cleaver however. You do need to learn sting ray anatomy however because they don't shoot things at you they whip there tail like a scorpion. I don't know if you were just going for realistics or not but if you were then you should know that. The game it'self is pretty basic and cuz of this I can't go into anything much deeper than this like I did earlyer.
Now then that is my review.
If anyone wants to judge my reveiw yer welcome to. I don't mind but make sure you read it ALL before casting judgement. I think that alot of you were lazy and didn't play the game and were to quick to judge because it goes against yer morals. But like I said that is not a real review
altr responds:
Thank you on that first paragraph. Honestly, that does mean a lot.
This really wasn't made for any type of shock value. I don't why/if others feel that way. As for killing the stingray, or any others, I don't believe it's right, but that's not why this game was made.
Stingray wise, yeah, we know it doesn't shoot out stingers but we wanted a bit of difficulty in the game.
Again, thank you for this review and not going crazy like others have and will. I'm sorry if you were disturbed by the flash in any way. That was not our intentions at all.
Crikey.
Those little buggers come at you so fast. I never knew that stringrays can shoot their spines out of their mouth too. That adds a whole new element of wtf. What's with all of the pansies reviewing this? Wacky controversial stuff like this is what Newgrounds made it's name on.
{{altr}}
-->KDOG
altr responds:
No idea what's up with all these people dude. Good to see sane people reviewing. =)
Abit harsh tbh
I mean... I've read alot of reviews and they clearly show that this is a very controversial flash.
Don't really know if it's a tribute or not, i guess it can be viewed as one, but not in my eyes.
Other than the topic being abit over-the-top, good game.
Want to see more games from you in da future :]
altr responds:
Is it really that controversial? It's not like we made a dart game where you throw stingers at Steve (that's a good idea, someone make that). I just don't get some people I guess. Thanks for playing.
Crikey?
Interesting game. Aside from the amateur hour graphics and the poorly placed "crickey" verbalization's coming from a U.S. expat (Mrs. Irwin,) the game itself was akin to a mild concussion. I fear is I had played the game any longer I might lose consciousness and slip into an unretrievable coma.
I'm certain the author is simply some child acting out from his bedroom. Perhaps he's in time-out and decided to share the misery with others. Regardless of the rationale, the "game" represents some of the crucial societal ills that are plaguing our nation and others. No longer are we allowed to morn the loss of a well known and well liked celebrity without pundits and critics weighing in and giving us their expert opinions instead of just taking a moment to give the family a bit of peace.
No, it's garbage like this "game" that just adds to the misery that the Irwin family is experiencing at this very moment. Imagine when a close friend goes to Terri and explains that some punk decided to make a funny game that exploits the death of her husband. Although, I do find some humor in the thought that Terri might come hunting for you (the author) instead of the stingray. At least the stingray was reacting based on instinct, whereas the author of this "game" appears to be pandering for nothing more than a few minutes of fame, be it negative or positive.
I look forward to your awkward attempt to discredit my post as you have done with other naysayers. Just keep in mind that not everyone shares you utter contempt for human life. Some people actually place value in friends and family, whereas you appear to be nothing more than pond scum. (No, strike that, I wouldn't want to insult pond scum.)
altr responds:
AHAHAHAHA. And discredit you I will:
Can you not see that you, like others who have reviewed, are being blinded by your own out of control feelings? I mean really, it does seem that many of you are unstable. I won't resort to petty name calling like like you, but it's obvious you have learned nothing from what I have said.
It's a simple game, yes, with showing one aspect of human emotion. As I've said before, of course she wouldn't do it, of course Steve would not have agreed to anything like it and I don't agree with killing them either.
You could almost call this a social experiment. You call me "pond scum" but look what arises in you when you didn't take the time to grasp what was made here. I'm fairly offended with YOUR lack of understanding and YOUR ills with which you put down into a review.
Instead of assuming we are some heartless bastards and ranting, could you not simply ask what/if is wrong with us? I'm not saying to totally shut down your feelings but please, show a little tact. We have feelings too.
In recap, you show more of a disregard for what was made, for your fellow humans and for yourself then what this game did. Also, she has said CRIKEY before. I WIN.