You basically just ripped off the portal survey from www.aperturescience.com. It's mostly the same (actually yours is shorter and less clever) but you changed the name and replaced Cake with Bagels. Real fucking original.
When i got the idea of this i didn't even know of www.aperturescience.com,
somebody actually told me about it through one of these reviews.
Trust me, i hate people who copy,
but may i ask you a question...?
Is there a reason behind the fact that you
just made your account today, and
this review is the only contribution to the site you've made so far.?
i took it twice and with the same answers (my answers not your who should prove it not to be random) and i got 49 and 2
the psychological preasure in the quiz is actually high but the questions are dumb and random. By the way there is only 1 task to complete besides the random questions which matters incredibly little to anyones intelligence or mental state. and this one task requires memory beyond believeable to acomplish... personally i took the lowest number i could remember and the highest number and took the number closest to the average of those. and thats about as much as you can do.
you made a great tension in the quiz but the questions were stupid.
Are you kidding me? Top 5? Come on...
How did this get onto the Daily Top 5? There were no graphics, no storyline or plot ... just a quiz with some humorous answers. It amazes me what you people will rank up there.
Did you play much of the game?
Games don't need graphics,
games don't need plots,
games don't need anything.
You can bend the rules if you know them well enough,
and that's what i've done with this game.
That's why i got a good prize for this,
people saw beyond the fact that
there wasn't amazing graphics.
I'm sorry you were expecting a little more ;[
Maybe after i get my graphics tablet you'll
like some of my future movies.
Even if you didn't like it, though,
thanks for reviewing :]
it sure is random number generator around here
seriously this is tthe worst i've seen.
bad it stinks