better then #1

it is better then #1, but still nothing close to SOC, which is obvious u like. not bad tho, work on the humor.

Eh?

Short and pointless. Normally i love these but this just didn't have it.
Mmmmmm...............

wtf

|I have no idea what the hell was going on, and the stereotypical angry indian shop owner! man that as hilarious!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1not

The accents make the movie.

Heh, I read the BBS post about this movie, and I had to see what it was all about. It was pretty good, overall. An interesting idea. However, the voice acting was by far the best part of this film.

Graphics: I liked the drawings. They were nicely done, although the animation seemed rather simplistic. 7/10.

Sound: The voice acting was hilarious. The accents seemed almost real. The background music fit the theme of the movie nicely. I didn't really like the credits music that much, but the other sound was nice. 8/10.

Interactivity: Just a play button, and there's no replay button, either. You need one of those. 0/10.

Style: An interestingly done style for this movie. Wasting liquor is bad, though. It brings out the point of this movie nicely. Although I thought it was a bit short for the load time. 7/10.

Violence: None, though a few threats of violence, noe. 1/10.

Humor: As I said before, the accents were hilarious. The theme of the movie was pretty good too - although the humor was a bit too spread out if you don't consider the accents. Still, for the accents - 8/10.

Overall: A nicely done short film. 7/10.

Miscellaneous: The title interested me. 2 pints is 32 ounces, and a liter is 33.6 ounces or thereabouts. So, "2 Pints Short of a Litre" is less than 5% of the desired volume. ... Wow. That was a mindless rant.

Final Verdict: If you don't mind the load time (Which, as I said, was a bit long for this length of movie) and aren't offended by the accents (You never know), you will likely be amused by this film. I would recommend it... unless you have a really slow connection.

goddamn

LOADS TOO SLOW!!