At 10/4/09 04:09 PM, sir5000 wrote:
Yes, there's no clear description, but what is your standpoint on the matter?
Idk, really. On some level people claim all sorts of shit as artistic expression and that's their right. I think something that in INTENDED to arouse sexually and be used in a sexual way should be considered porn but that doesn't mean it isn't also art as well. It's all in the intention, I guess, and the intention of someone else is something that's really difficult to gauge.
There is no reason that art can not be pornographic and no reason porn can not be artistic. I think hand drawn pin-ups and hentai are clearly artistic endevors but are also pornographic in nature.
My conclusion, then, is that porn and art are not two mutually exclusive things.
If there is a job somewhere deciding what is art and what is porn, I'd be terrible at it. =]