http://www.newgrounds.com/port...&page=1&user_id=429964

I don't see what the FUCK would make anyone write a review like this.. That movie has gotten so many bad reviews for no reason at all. Some of these reviews are worse than ones I've seen on movies that DESERVED them, like ones showing pictures/movies of dead people or people dying, racist movies, and crap like that. But I don't see what in this movie makes people write reviews like this.

Is anybody actually going to look at what I did?

At 8/19/03 07:40 AM, Sekky wrote: Is anybody actually going to look at what I did?

i did but why would we ever whant too view random reviews??

Dude...it's for voting on them! I've usefully categorised them into those, so that people can just go there and help out. The ones in 'debatable' and 'borderline' you can come here and cast your opinion over. Click the giant GO button to vote.

Why is it if it's HTML it's useful but when it's in Flash it isn't? It's an extremely sophisticated script.

At 8/19/03 07:58 AM, Sekky wrote: Why is it if it's HTML it's useful but when it's in Flash it isn't? It's an extremely sophisticated script.

Nice little webpage you got going there. Makes marking reviews a lot easier.

The HTML one or the Flash one?

At 8/19/03 08:47 AM, Sekky wrote: The HTML one or the Flash one?

The Flash one. It's pretty smart.

Thanks, it's all done dynamically too, so all I have to do is type AddReview(and a few details in here); and it does it all for me.

At 8/18/03 06:26 PM, the_phantom_spancker wrote: Hey Alex where you been?

OMFG. It's teh spancker !!!
Nice to see you again ol' compulsive postah !
Sorry if I respond a bit ... later. But I'm kind of turning like you a few months ago: " no more NG ", only deposit regularly.
I've recently been away for the holidays. But I'm BACK.

Remember me?

Who wouldn't ? :-)

Lock and load ladies and gentlemen, the same retarded Outwar spammer that showed up in the reviews of all the highly rated movies (with a random geocities site) is back. Just look for the guy claiming he's stolen the entire top 50 or something.

Ok, you can now get to my review crusade file in my signature. Please tell me if you don't like something about it or if you have a suggestion to improve it.

Awww You guys are just too nice...

Now my whistle level is even higher!

Now they have [BANNED] next to the name of the reviewer when they are banned. Hopefully that will stop people from saying "BAN THAT GUY!!" hours after they already have been.

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/readreview.php3?user_id=601589 Hmm... I don't know wtf http://www.kkthxbye.com is, but apparently its another spam-link type game. I checked reviews like.. 5 seconds after this guy made his first review. I hope this type of spam doesn't happen often.

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/readreview.php3?user_id=557824

A lot of his reviews are abusive and retarded, the rest are just unhelpful. Unsurprisingly, he lists himself as "13, Flash Designer"

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/readreview.php3?user_id=589060

A couple of abusive reviews, and a lot of nonsense reviews.

At 8/23/03 03:51 PM, jonthomson wrote: http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/readreview.php3?user_id=557824

A lot of his reviews are abusive and retarded, the rest are just unhelpful. Unsurprisingly, he lists himself as "13, Flash Designer"

A real 13 year old prick. I like these. Those ppl make me outstanding. Muhahahah! =)

Drewdance is special. His batting average is 1.13.
He reviews a lot of shit, but with only abusive comments (blammed submissions).

Thanx for teh help, jonthomson!

Hahaha. There are still these kind of morons here in NG ?
I thought we had eradicated them and they were extinct !
Guess I wuz wrong !

try on http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/readreview.php3?id=55896&page=8

Here are some people to mark
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/readreview.php3?user_id=457978
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/readreview.php3?user_id=603889
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/readreview.php3?user_id=531454
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/readreview.php3?user_id=560425
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/readreview.php3?user_id=574618

opps forgot to post this one.
http://www.newgrounds.com/port...ort=date_mr&user_id=290972

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/readreview.php3?user_id=603718

This guy has a couple abusive reviews

he left a bad/abusive/meam review because the movie took to long to load, even though it's only 3megs and he's on dialup

Outwar:
http://www.newgrounds.com/port...ting&id=117602&page=77
http://www.newgrounds.com/port...ting&id=118826&page=42
http://www.newgrounds.com/port...ating&id=119198&page=4
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/readreview.php3?id=118798
http://www.newgrounds.com/port...ting&id=110714&page=81
http://www.newgrounds.com/port...ing&id=113889&page=197
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/readreview.php3?id=118564&page=2
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/readreview.php3?id=117511&page=1
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/readreview.php3?id=118257
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/readreview.php3?id=11907

Just plain Dickhead:
http://www.newgrounds.com/port...198&sort=rating&page=5
http://www.newgrounds.com/port...&sort=rating&id=110714
http://www.newgrounds.com/port...&sort=rating&id=113889
http://www.newgrounds.com/port...ing&id=113889&page=197

I was terribly bored.. And I hate bananacreampie!! Some pie is evil!!!!

At 8/29/03 05:57 AM, Pwn3r wrote: how many people on NG have gold whistles?

Only one I know of right now is ramagi.

When are we gonna get some relevant numbers for the whistle stuff in our profiles?

At 8/29/03 11:47 AM, Sekky wrote: When are we gonna get some relevant numbers for the whistle stuff in our profiles?

Maybe yes, maybe no. If this was intended, I see no reason for it not to have been included when the whistle system was launched. But I am guessing there will be updates to teh whistle system.

At 8/29/03 04:20 PM, -_-PZY-_- wrote:

At 8/29/03 11:47 AM, Sekky wrote: When are we gonna get some relevant numbers for the whistle stuff in our profiles?

Maybe yes, maybe no. If this was intended, I see no reason for it not to have been included when the whistle system was launched. But I am guessing there will be updates to teh whistle system.

Perhaps, perhaps... all in good time.

The closest I've seen to actual discussion of how the whistle point system works, BTW, was recently posted by Wade, I believe in the 3rd page of the "No voting panel for submissions" thread.

In it, he warned against whistling movies you THINK won't load for everyone, but might actually just be your problem, and said that such a bad whistle would count in the negative direction about 10x as much as one correct whistle.

Be careful with those whistles, folks.

At 8/30/03 06:30 AM, gfoxcook wrote: The closest I've seen to actual discussion of how the whistle point system works, BTW, was recently posted by Wade, I believe in the 3rd page of the "No voting panel for submissions" thread.

In it, he warned against whistling movies you THINK won't load for everyone, but might actually just be your problem, and said that such a bad whistle would count in the negative direction about 10x as much as one correct whistle.

He didn't say that per se, he just suggested figures. Nowhere in that post does Wade say that those are the actual figures.

There were a couple of Outwar spammers in the Battlefield III reviews last night - if they're still there, flag them.

At 8/30/03 06:39 AM, jonthomson wrote:

At 8/30/03 06:30 AM, gfoxcook wrote: The closest I've seen to actual discussion of how the whistle point system works, BTW, was recently posted by Wade, I believe in the 3rd page of the "No voting panel for submissions" thread.

In it, he warned against whistling movies you THINK won't load for everyone, but might actually just be your problem, and said that such a bad whistle would count in the negative direction about 10x as much as one correct whistle.

He didn't say that per se, he just suggested figures. Nowhere in that post does Wade say that those are the actual figures.

Well, I DID say "about 10x." I doubt he would have just pulled those figures out of his ass, they must have been nearly true. The point is that screwing up a whistle hurts you by at least a full digit's worth factor over successful whistles, and that's a bit unsettling to me at least.

Plus, he talks about the "weight" your whistles have depending on your level. And yes, not in specific terms, but I'd never seen him talk about that in ANY terms before, that's all I was stressing.

I hope this helps...
http://www.newgrounds.com/port...1&sort=rating&id=58223