At 9/19/06 08:05 PM, Chronamut wrote:
oh believe me you take the cake on THAT one pookie head :P

Cake? You mean chocolate cake? Or brownies? LoL. You know that I don't like you. >: P

I have to ask again. Why didn't the other judges posted their reviews yet? Some people are waiting for that!! >: (

Rucklo! Summon swedish beer or something...

>: (

At 9/20/06 09:53 AM, Chronamut wrote:
since when?? :(

Since the day I plague this site. >: (

It's just a duty to piss people off...because I'm a bastard! >: (

Nuff said! >: (

>:(

At 9/20/06 07:30 AM, DarKsidE555 wrote: Why didn't the other judges posted their reviews yet? Some people are waiting for that!! >: (

Like who? Like me? - I'm not posting my individual results. I never do.

I'd give you yours if I had 'em but I did not vote on your submission?

Fun fact for you - you got the single HIGHEST vote for your submission of a 90.7

The second highest single vote for any submission was 87.4 to WinTang
The third highest was a 83.1 for schwam

At 9/20/06 10:50 AM, LJCoffee wrote:

At 9/20/06 07:30 AM, DarKsidE555 wrote: Why didn't the other judges posted their reviews yet? Some people are waiting for that!! >: (

Oh really? 90.7 ? Cool. It was really the highest? Oo woah.

Na, LJ, I guess rucklo asked all the judges to post their reviews for the submissions because the people want some feedback/critic. I know who my judges are except for one but others just don't.

I mean don't YOU would like to know why you recieved 67, 80 or 30 points. I mean nobody will get mad at you. But...if they do, I'll be threre with my no0bzor cannon. >: (

At 9/20/06 11:05 AM, DarKsidE555 wrote: Oh really? 90.7 ? Cool. It was really the highest? Oo woah.

Yep - really. Your submission kicked ass.

I know who my judges are except for one but others just don't.
I mean don't YOU would like to know why you recieved 67, 80 or 30 points. I mean nobody will get mad at you. But...if they do, I'll be threre with my no0bzor cannon. >: (

I hear ya - I'm not personally worried about offending anyone - Either they will accept the criticism or they won't. If they get mad then oh well... what are they gonna do? go zero vote my submissions?? OOOHH NOOOOO!!!! :D

To be honest, I just didn't write very lengthy individual reviews for each entry so there isn't much point in posting them. They're only one or two lines at most usually with small notes to myself that may be too easliy taken out of context...

Next time around though, I'll try to make it a point to flesh out the reviews more and prep them for posting.

Hey guy<s, hers my TANKMEN song for the contesntt!
im not too laet, am I ???

LOLOL sry i just had to :(

If August was MAC6 then shouldn't October be MAC7?

I think MAC6 means MAC 2006, silly kirizzy.

At 10/26/06 07:01 PM, Grumbleduke wrote: I think MAC6 means MAC 2006, silly kirizzy.

... I see... so that means we had 3 MAC6s. One in july, august and october... unless I'm missing any. It's still kinda confusing though...

Meh, take it up with Rucklo, see if it can be re-named something less confusing.