At 12/6/05 12:24 PM, -ABSENTMlNDED- wrote:
After all, he is breaking rule 2:
Do not post TONS and TONS of crappy reviews just to get high in the rankings. If we catch someone doing this we will delete all their reviews- wouldn't that be a pain in the ass? Take your time and write a sincere review for every movie you wish to critique. Make sure your review is relative to the submission. Reviews that are found to offer no benefit to the author maybe deleted.
I think that when people break that rule, action should be taken, but it never is, both RemRulzz and KWAS71KCK deserve review bans and about 95% of their reviews deleted.
By my reading of that rule, all their reviews should be deleted. By my understanding of that rule, if I went and wrote say 400 crappy uninformative 1-2 liners, I'd deserve ALL my reviews deleted, just as the rule states.
At 1/3/06 09:45 AM, Auz wrote:
And as promised, the numbers 101-150. Changes are all compared to 4 weeks ago and if BMX007 and Zouk were included.
101) 0601 +000 ZombieLennon (-1)
102) 0600 +000 HardJudge (-1)
103) etc. etc. etc. ....
Wow. That's a nice format... weekly top 100, double-fortnightly 101-150. Also, real dedication from you.
At 3/8/06 02:40 PM, -ABSENTMlNDED- wrote:
At 3/8/06 03:24 AM, XwaynecoltX wrote:
Im trying a new way of Reviewing, it has 3 things, its in the last few reviews i have done , please check them out aand let me know what you think, is good, better, confusing what???
Disciss please...
I don't know ~X~ it looks a little odd, I prefer reviews to be all together rather than having different sections focusing on different things, but that's just me...
I already commented on the new style in the reviewer's club. I agree with Afrostud (I'll carry on calling him that whilst he plays with his name) - I once considered breaking up my reviews but decided that it's nice to be able to do reviews in different styles if you want, mixing it up.
It is awesome though, as it means you remember to put something in each category and is probably better for doing quick reviews, like is appropriate for on NG. Like I said before, I think -X-'s new review style is awesome and will ensure his reviews are a great help to all.
Hey, -X-, do you still do reviews on request?
I decided to change my reviews, inspired by -X-. I'm gonna address negatives and positives in its own section, rating each with up to 5-s or +s. That way, it can be easily seen just how good/bad I consider each aspect I comment on.
For games, I'll also mention my experience. (lives lost, etc.) in it's own section.
I think reviews are probably more entertaining to read as one long thing, but are more helpful in the long run broken up.
Take a look and let me know what you think of my new style.
At 3/14/06 11:38 AM, Auz wrote:
Update #29
Thanks for doing this, Auz.
1) 13618 +036 XwaynecoltX
2) 12822 +029 KWAS71KCK
Glad to see -X- is doing more reviews than KWAS. I remember a while ago, -X- mentioned he'd get worried if he was ever less than 1000 in front of KWAS, but until then he could relax. Well, specially with his new style, I'd hate for him to lose ground.
-X-, it's time to open up the gap.
20) 1600 +000 jonthomson
21) 1584 +000 AntiGravity
22) 1475 +000 DevastatoR_da_X
23) 1462 +007 iscRulz (+1)
24) 1459 +000 Bezman (-1)
We'll see some movement there this week. I made a decision to review everything I watch, unless it's a game and I plan to replay and get further later.
I wanna spread the love, just like the others who do that already.