At 7/5/19 10:09 PM, Zophar wrote:
I usually just use mastering websites. I've always done that because I've found that when I try to master something it doesn't always come out the way I want it to. I also think it's easier, but then again you don't really have control over how the final master sounds if you use online mastering.
If it gets the results you want then that's the main thing and it's definitely easier and cheaper than hiring someone, though as well as not really having control over how the final master sounds, if you use an automated mastering system you're not getting feedback on your mix to really get it sounding the best it can be. The website's not going to message you to say "actually I think this bit needs just a little more/less something", it's just going to do the best with what it's given and send it back.
The job of a (good) mastering engineer should be to be the final line of checking to present the music in the best possible way for distribution (as well as prepare it for specific formatting if need be such as cutting vinyl masters which will physically play well). When people are using "Mastering" websites, they're only really getting a small amount of the service that a mastering engineer should be providing, although you're only paying a fraction of the cost so it may feel justifiable. You're also not getting that personal treatment for your own music, sure it'll measure the frequency content and adjust as necessary differently depending on the source material, but you're unable to say, "I like the overall sound of this artist, could you try to get it sounding similar to that". You're getting an optimized version of what you're providing the automated system but not nessessarily the most optimized version, and I think this is something that comes from a really good back and forth discussion with your mastering engineer, something you cant get from an automated system.
That said, good and affordable mastering engineers aren't within everyone's budgets and an automatated system can feel like the lesser of a few evils when compared to not mastering at all or mastering things yourself when you're not able to get the results you're after. If people do decide to opt for an automated system though, I think at the very least it'd be best to run their mix by someone who has a good and experienced ear for mixing, music and audio engineering at a technical level to make sure they aren't putting out something which has any major errors, and effectively wasting their money by mastering something which isn't ready yet.
Those are my thoughts anyways, but I must admit that I'm definitely biased having worked as a mastering engineer for a fair few years now XD Can't have those websites stealing my clients, but I think it's more important just to make people aware of the differences in the services being provided by the websites vs hiring a human to do it. And that's not to say that automated systems can make pretty good if not great masters depending on the source material, but you don't get that back and forth to really make the best of your music. There are so called mastering engineers who can make your music sound terrible too and charge an arm and a leg for it though those people hopefully don't last too long in the industry. The trick is finding a mastering engineer you can trust, get along with and knows your genre of music really well, and you can be sure you'll have a good relationship for years to come making top notch tunes which will show off your music in the best way possible.