Sorry, but no. Girls have it way worse, in almost every way imaginable.

i think maybe you are a little retarded but really shits just different yo like bitches cant grow out mustaches but hell sarah silverman had this fake mustache on in one of her shows and i was like "damn id sSTILL fuck her!" see its because sarah silverman is hot as fuck

At 12/5/11 09:46 PM, AlexKeller wrote: Sorry, but no. Girls have it way worse, in almost every way imaginable.

You have a good amount of months to prepare for child birth, we have a good millisecond to prepare to get hit in the nuts which can occur at almost any time.

At 12/5/11 10:09 PM, SandStar643 wrote:

At 12/5/11 09:46 PM, AlexKeller wrote: Sorry, but no. Girls have it way worse, in almost every way imaginable.

You have a good amount of months to prepare for child birth, we have a good millisecond to prepare to get hit in the nuts which can occur at almost any time.

I'm sorry, I just can't see how getting hit in the nuts is worse than childbirth. Where is the proof, here? Yes, passing kidney stones seems believably similar for men, but getting kicked in the nuts? Have you ever had your body rip from your testicles to your asshole and have to get sewn back up afterward after getting kicked in the testes? Does it take you days/weeks to recover? Probably not, but that's not uncommon when women give birth. I bet if you gave men everywhere the option of experiencing a swift kick to the groin, or childbirth, they would all choose the kick. I probably would, just from what I hear one or the other sounds like from other people, as I've honestly experienced neither.

Still, apples and oranges, here.

At 12/5/11 10:14 PM, BananasFoster wrote:

At 12/5/11 10:09 PM, SandStar643 wrote: You have a good amount of months to prepare for child birth, we have a good millisecond to prepare to get hit in the nuts which can occur at almost any time.

I'm sorry, I just can't see how getting hit in the nuts is worse than childbirth.

Hahahahahhahahaha I am literally laughing my ass off at this argument

At 12/5/11 10:14 PM, BananasFoster wrote:

At 12/5/11 10:09 PM, SandStar643 wrote:

At 12/5/11 09:46 PM, AlexKeller wrote: Sorry, but no. Girls have it way worse, in almost every way imaginable.

You have a good amount of months to prepare for child birth, we have a good millisecond to prepare to get hit in the nuts which can occur at almost any time.

I'm sorry, I just can't see how getting hit in the nuts is worse than childbirth. Where is the proof, here? Yes, passing kidney stones seems believably similar for men, but getting kicked in the nuts? Have you ever had your body rip from your testicles to your asshole and have to get sewn back up afterward after getting kicked in the testes? Does it take you days/weeks to recover? Probably not, but that's not uncommon when women give birth. I bet if you gave men everywhere the option of experiencing a swift kick to the groin, or childbirth, they would all choose the kick. I probably would, just from what I hear one or the other sounds like from other people, as I've honestly experienced neither.

Still, apples and oranges, here.

Yes, apples and oranges, but my girlfriend who's given birth twice now due to being raped treats child birth as if it was merely an every day thing. (I have no idea why she didn't just get an abortion, don't ask me) Of course you can't experience both, but not all women experience child birth where almost every man ha been kicked in the nuts.

I'd of course pick the kick to the nuts, but I'm sayin on a frequency scale, the kick to the nuts will happen much more often, and if you add it up, who knows, some men may have experienced the same level of pain.

@Person who's laughing.(On an IPod so I'm too lazy to quote you too) That was the point, wasn't really being too serious there.)

At 12/5/11 10:18 PM, Mfan wrote:

At 12/5/11 10:14 PM, BananasFoster wrote:

I'm sorry, I just can't see how getting hit in the nuts is worse than childbirth.

i hate to quote myself , but...

"a woman can still reproduce after child birth, where as if a man has significant testicular trauma , his days of ejaculation are over"

Okay, and some men and women are infertile without suffering and extreme trauma? Some women can experience no trauma at all and be rendered incapable of having children. What does infertility have to do with this? If a woman had significant uterine/ovarian trauma, she wouldn't be able to produce children anymore. I don't see what you're getting at.

You can't really compare those two. Women were made to withstand having children, yes, but that doesn't mean it's not painful just because it's normal. I'm not saying getting kicked in the balls isn't painful, but seriously... you'd rather give birth? Seriously? Do you know how long some women are in labor for, or what contractions feel like? If a guy gets kicked in the balls once, he'll only start feeling better from there. To compare, I'd imagine you'd have to actually continue shoving your foot into his groin to mimic the continual process of childbirth.

Really though, if you're getting kicked in the balls so often, perhaps it's a sign you're a person that shouldn't be reproducing anyway. Others are just trying to render you infertile, clearly.

At 12/5/11 10:23 PM, SandStar643 wrote:
Yes, apples and oranges, but my girlfriend who's given birth twice now due to being raped treats child birth as if it was merely an every day thing. (I have no idea why she didn't just get an abortion, don't ask me) Of course you can't experience both, but not all women experience child birth where almost every man ha been kicked in the nuts.

Women still (though probably not as often) receive trauma to their nether regions without giving birth, and that still sucks. Same amount of nerve endings for both genders (though male anatomy is much more accessible for a swift kick). That sucks about your girlfriends; it sounds like she didn't get an abortion either because of her beliefs or because she became attached - neither are uncommon, so that's pretty understandable.

I'm not saying men are wusses about certain things, but women, from the moment they hit puberty, are bombarded with the idea that they WILL someday conceive children and go through childbirth. It's a rite of passage for women to be introduced to and have this idea thrown at them. There are whole television shows dedicated to women giving birth and starting families, problems happening during childbirth, etc etc. There is almost a 'pregnancy culture' in a sense. There is nothing like this for getting kicked in the balls, except for stunt shows where ball-damage is a given. Now, there may not be shows about getting your arm chopped off, but that doesn't mean it's any more fun an experience.

I'd of course pick the kick to the nuts, but I'm sayin on a frequency scale, the kick to the nuts will happen much more often, and if you add it up, who knows, some men may have experienced the same level of pain.

I have gotten pinched far more often than I'll ever give birth or get kicked in the nuts, but I could never add that up to equally or surpassing the experience of giving birth or getting kicked in the nuts.

At 12/5/11 10:37 PM, BananasFoster wrote:

At 12/5/11 10:23 PM, SandStar643 wrote:

Women still (though probably not as often) receive trauma to their nether regions without giving birth, and that still sucks. Same amount of nerve endings for both genders (though male anatomy is much more accessible for a swift kick). That sucks about your girlfriends; it sounds like she didn't get an abortion either because of her beliefs or because she became attached - neither are uncommon, so that's pretty understandable.

I'm not saying men are wusses about certain things, but women, from the moment they hit puberty, are bombarded with the idea that they WILL someday conceive children and go through childbirth. It's a rite of passage for women to be introduced to and have this idea thrown at them. There are whole television shows dedicated to women giving birth and starting families, problems happening during childbirth, etc etc. There is almost a 'pregnancy culture' in a sense. There is nothing like this for getting kicked in the balls, except for stunt shows where ball-damage is a given. Now, there may not be shows about getting your arm chopped off, but that doesn't mean it's any more fun an experience.

Yes, true, and you are right there does seem to almost be a culture, and in a way, it is disgusting. It shouldn't be like that at all for when a women has to choose whether or not to have child, sure she should be educated, but the amount of influence and oressure on women in incredible.

I still can't figure it out, and it may be the attachment, as it seems a bit like her, and when you're as young as she was, she probably made the decision sue to the attachment...

I have gotten pinched far more often than I'll ever give birth or get kicked in the nuts, but I could never add that up to equally or surpassing the experience of giving birth or getting kicked in the nuts.

It is quite the as to put it 'experience' to get kicked, something you'll have to trust us on.

Yes, but still again, it is a stupid point, but men getting kicked can lead to infertility which does not in most cases occur with child birth.
Also, the inability to ejaculate which just blows...

These stay with you for life, when the pain of childbirth, comes with the reward of the child, you just get the shitty side effects with the kick.

I do apologise for the short responses, but I'm on an iPod because I don't have my computer currently with me, and it is a pain to type a lot on this thing.

At 12/5/11 10:47 PM, SandStar643 wrote:
It is quite the as to put it 'experience' to get kicked, something you'll have to trust us on.

Yes, but still again, it is a stupid point, but men getting kicked can lead to infertility which does not in most cases occur with child birth.
Also, the inability to ejaculate which just blows...

It's not a stupid point, it's still very relevant, and I can see what you're getting at. It's less likely someone could walk up to a woman and make her infertile than a man, although I don't know statistically how common it is for men to become infertile after being kicked in the groin.

These stay with you for life, when the pain of childbirth, comes with the reward of the child, you just get the shitty side effects with the kick.

Hey though - women still get kicked in the groin, too! So in a way it's not so different for either gender.. though I'll give you that men definitely seem more prone to getting kicked in their nether regions than women, which sucks for dudes. I would never kick anyone in their groin unless in self-defense. I seriously know women who've done it just because they are pissed, and I think that is absolutely terrible.

At 12/5/11 10:53 PM, BananasFoster wrote:

At 12/5/11 10:47 PM, SandStar643 wrote:

It's not a stupid point, it's still very relevant, and I can see what you're getting at. It's less likely someone could walk up to a woman and make her infertile than a man, although I don't know statistically how common it is for men to become infertile after being kicked in the groin.

I can't believe it's incredibly common, but our organs are located there, so in theory if we were kicked hard enough, or at the right time, we'd loose our ability to have children.

Hey though - women still get kicked in the groin, too! So in a way it's not so different for either gender.. though I'll give you that men definitely seem more prone to getting kicked in their nether regions than women, which sucks for dudes. I would never kick anyone in their groin unless in self-defense. I seriously know women who've done it just because they are pissed, and I think that is absolutely terrible.

Yes, because it's a simply technique that will make almost any man roll over in pain.
Self-defence is about the only.... So to say, honourable time to do it, just walking up to someone and doing it is just a bit over the top, and simply as I lack a better word, 'douchey'.

At 12/5/11 11:08 PM, SandStar643 wrote:

Yes, because it's a simply technique that will make almost any man roll over in pain.
Self-defence is about the only.... So to say, honourable time to do it, just walking up to someone and doing it is just a bit over the top, and simply as I lack a better word, 'douchey'.

I'd consider it more than 'douchey'. Seriously, not to pull this card out, but if someone walked up to some random woman and kicked her in the groin, a big deal would be made about it by anyone who witnessed it. I think it has sadly become somewhat acceptable to do that to men though... it's like people satire it or use it as a 'comical' point in cartoons, tv shows, etc.

At 12/5/11 11:08 PM, SpaceWhale wrote: Where's ModernPatriot when you need him?

we don't need anymore dumbasses in this thread.

At 12/5/11 05:25 PM, SuperShad wrote: I don't know if it's a woman's constant need to turn shit into an argument, but when it boils down to the basic "who has it worst" question, they always pull out the periods, pregnancy and appearance bullshit. Guy problems can vastly overshadow this, and I am compelled to list such!

1) When you break up with us, it takes you about 5 minutes to have a new guy as you women have no feelings of loyalty to anyone but yourselves. It may take a man years to find another, with the possibility of history repeating itself.

OP was dumped for another guy. Seriously though, what kind of bullshit are you on about? This makes no sense.

2) You can have all the sex you want, you don't have to worry about getting anyone pregnant.

You know, except themselves, right?

3) Peacocking. Wikipedia that shit.

No, how about you fucking explain it. You're not selling your point very well. Both sexes show off, assuming you're talking about that kind of peacocking.

4) Girls get to talk with other girls about how they like. A guy telling other guys turns into him having to prove his worth.

Again, what are you on about?

5) Women always complain about how guys are assholes. Chivalry is dead, and women killed it with that feminism and sexism crap.

Chivalry never died, only chivalrous men have died. You're fucking stupid.

6) Ugly girls can buy a fuckton of sex toys with no qualms at all - a dude buying a fleshlight makes Fox News at 10.

I have yet to see any news articles pertaining to the purchasing of male sex toys.

7) Girls are expected to be all emotional and shit. A guy tries to show his emotions and he's gay.

No, a guy showing womanly emotions is not seen as masculine.

8) Testicular trauma has been proven to be exponentially more painful that childbirth.

It's proven that more women give birth than men get serious testicular problems. I have no real proof, but you have no credibility, so its all good.

9) Girls can accessorize all they want. Aside from hair gel, a guy showing preference for his brands is gay.

Again, if you are a man aspiring to act womanly, than it is only appropriate that others do not see you as masculine. Not everything equals gay, you know?

10) Nobody fucking asked you to get pregnant, shut up.

Shut up, and stop complaining like a bitch.

11) If they don't fit into a certain clique, girls can always pull that "Miss Independent" shtick. What can we say that would deter you from the impression that we're loners?

Uhm, we can declare ourselves independent? I'm not part of any cliques, I do my own thing, and I'm accepted by people because I'm not a stupid prick like you.

12) Some girls can look sexier in sweats and their hair in a bun than with a tight skirt and make-up. We either look like Hollister models or bums.

Are you implying you want to wear a tight-skirt and make-up and still appear like a man?

I can't think of any more shit off the top of my head, but I've barely scratched the surface, trust me.

Converse amongst yourselves!

You're either really fucking stupid, or attempting to troll. I'm going with the first.

i disagree.
girls have to deal with looking good everyday, breasts, their monthly period, bulling/teasing, what to wear, most girls are regarded as sex objects -_-, people, ALWAYS make stupid porn with stupid men raping stupid girls, rape, being beat up... idc.. that's all i can think of, but girls have to 100x WORSE than boys.

Maybe they do, maybe they don't

Wow.

I'd like to go deeper than my 'wow', those that should really be enough to be honest.

I think bleeding out of your cunt for 4-5 days every single month from the age of 13 to 50 (give or take), besides 9 months where one may be carrying child (which isn't a picnic ride either), completely blows your whole 'argument' out the water.

Because periods just fucking suck. Guys get avoid talking about them, try living with them.

Hey guys, hey! Are you listening? What if? Guys!

What if we stopped whining about everything and instead went out and had fun and stuff?

or put all our differences aside and had a big fucking orgy?

At 12/6/11 05:34 AM, Gagsy wrote: Because periods just fucking suck. Guys get avoid talking about them, try living with them.

Valid point.
Everybody is just bitter because they've obviously had some past failures with women or they're generally undesirable by women so they just feel the need to vent like this, it's silly.
Their arguments have no base, and in the end, they end up being wrong, it's just a pointless flame war.

At 12/6/11 05:40 AM, Erty wrote: Hey guys, hey! Are you listening? What if? Guys!

What if we stopped whining about everything and instead went out and had fun and stuff?

or put all our differences aside and had a big fucking orgy?

I fucking love you.

What a load of misogynistic wank.