At 12/8/08 02:27 PM, gumOnShoe wrote:
At 12/8/08 02:19 PM, Zerok wrote:
Offsite voting is just begging for abuse though.
Example of what I meant: http://webpub/student/K/kirklib/state/St ateOfTheUnion.php
Also, I determinded that the "results" need to be colored red or something that way the users grab all of the correct code, but the test thread worked out fine: http://www.newgrounds.com/bbs/topic/9961 65/1
Oh okay, so... it doesn't really grab anything from NG, just makes the process radio-button friendly and gives you some nice output to C-P into the thread? You'd have to get EVERYONE to do it though, so you could properly gather all the data. Old habits die hard: we'd be manually entering votes for people who just didn't listen to the instruction at the top of the thread. Does the webpage itself save the input, or do you have to go back into the thread and scoop up everyone's copy pastes? If its the former, you'd have to check every post against input to assure that some jackass didn't vote 50 times, and if it's the latter it's still a bitch of a job to scoop up all the replies (although I imagine you'd have a script for it).
It'd be cool to set up the entire thing externally, but make an NG "registration" type thread on the BBS. People who want to vote post and you manually set up an account for them, or they sign up for themselves and post some sort of confirmation code into the thread... the main concern is designing it so that the little shits who are determined to "beat the system (for the sake of beating the system)" ... can't.
If such a design could be nailed down we'd be able to keep all votes and nominations anonymous. The discussion thread would suffer, and I wonder if the bias-entertainment tradeoff would be worth it. Half the fun is ctrl+f-ing like mad, right?