Interesting...
But you'd do better to develop your metaphors/analogies better - simply because these symbols are the very raw and basic elements of the message you're trying to convey and nothing complex or new. All in all, this is well done but rather plain, even though that does technically help convey the message better (which you decided to blatantly explain in the comments, so that's not really an excuse for over simplification).
Also, I'm inclined to disagree with one point on your opinion (not disagreeing with whatever religion you have, as I cannot prove it either way). Should we follow authority or our own heart? It's a broad and risky statement, which is great, but sometimes guidance is needed where human selfishness takes over so I'd say neither answer is always right.
Ultimately, I think you're right in saying technology is responsible (and therefore humans are responsible through technology) for much of the destruction of nature. HOWEVER, humans were destroying nature long before "technology," though perhaps not as rapidly, and there's really no way to stop human progress. I'm a little tired of people shouting out against modern society when they should be directing it instead.