So...
Am I going to learn how to shoot lazors out of my ass after I've seen the whole series? :D
Great flash, very creative!
Reviews for "SS - Human History 2"
First of all, that was fantastic.
Secondly, there are some previous reviews that I just don't understand. Why would you rate a video down just because you disagree with the message it's trying to communicate. Either that or some people are trolling, which would explain some of the poorer spelling in certain reviews. i just think it's a dog move to rate a video down that clearly deserves great reviews.
Anyhoo, this was an amazing flash, really well put together and voiced. The animations were really good with humorous pictures during a serious section that made it light and funny enough not to depress people. There was some repitition but only enough so you as the creator didn't have to do loads of stuff. The voice over was great, really added something to it and made possible to watch such a long flash.
I really enjoyed it and I believe more open minded people or even people who like a good flash or story will enjoy it as much as I did.
Congrats on making a really good flash,
MrToiss
Hahaha!
Atlantis! Martians!
Comedic gold! Hahaha!
Five stars!
Had to be the longest flash video I have ever seen
Excelent story and very interesting points.
c**p
Do you know why all of these are bullshit? Because they are NOT scientific. And why do I say this? Because the following:
"The Oxford English Dictionary says that scientific method is: "a method of procedure that has characterized natural science since the 17th century, consisting in systematic observation, measurement, and experiment, and the formulation, testing, and modification of hypotheses."
You jumped from the initial hypothesis to the final conclusion without even contemplating other theories, regardless of whether they be mainstream or not. Face it, everything you put here has been learned from elsewhere, therefore your very understanding of the matter is a mere by-product or other theories.
By putting scientifically-proven facts with other cock and bull ideas you attempt to fool the fools into believing the WHOLE THING is "scientifically proven", while most of them are just your own words, or interpretations, with no practical evidence whatsoever.
One question - if your discovery is so ground-breaking, why aren't these being published in research magazines such as the NewScientist? If these are REAL, why aren't they being discussed around G20 summits?