00:00
00:00
Newgrounds Background Image Theme

Dumbuhgly just joined the crew!

We need you on the team, too.

Support Newgrounds and get tons of perks for just $2.99!

Create a Free Account and then..

Become a Supporter!

Reviews for "CellCraft"

it had promise...

but the movement was almost impossible and you couldn't move to get glucose or amino acids directly, but had to move near them and hope the membrane would pick it up.

EPIC FAIL

takes wayyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy yyyyyyy to long to load and its not realy worth it.

Not even entertaining propaganda

Utterly boring game mechanics are made even worse by the first five missions just being boring, restrictive tutorials, but this game has bigger problems. The ID slant is really obvious even from the inclusion of platypi, creationists' favorite cheerleaders. I can't help but wonder how much creative control Dewitt and Macosko had; either the devs were played, or are knowingly pushing for ID garbage.

This game is "Intelligent Design" propaganda

"Also thanks to Dr. Jed Macosko at Wake Forest University and Dr. David Dewitt at Liberty University for providing lots of support and biological guidance."
Both of these men are creationist hacks trying to get their "science" into schools using the intelligent design wedge strategy, but they have no more knowledge of the actual biological sciences then Jenny McCarthy has about the real genetic causes of autism. Cells don't magically poof new organelles into existence, they evolve, unless you are talking about the creationist "worldview" in which DNA is pre-designed for the future instead of evolving due to what benefits the populations of the different species over long periods of time. Obviously you are trying to make an educational game so please, next time consult real scientists who deal with the actual science and not people who try to make the world fit their pre-conceived views.
http://ncse.com/
^National Center for Science Education

game only loads the first level