Not working for me.
I'm sorry. This just doesn't cut it as something I like. This isn't because everyone else decided it stinks, but because I feel it stinks. Why? Allow me to explain:
First: Revenge of the Sith wasn't to be a 'made fun of' Star Wars movie. It was to the climax of the first three episodes, and to fill in all the gaps of the first two movies, and readying the viewers for the next three.
Second: Four buttons and four short animations didn't cut it for me for a front page material thing. I've seen shorter, and I've seen less, but it definately had a reason for being there, like creative use of a new feature, or actual humor of a topic more deserving. Star Wars doesn't fit in with the "humor" department, expecially here.
Third: The grapics were the only thing that worked. Beyond that, there were few sounds, very little interactivity other than button hitting, and the style was just wrong. I've said it before, and I'll still say it: Star Wars isn't to be made fun of in this way, at least, not without a good reason for it. Had Jar Jar Binks came into this movie with more than "Excuse me" as their only line, and they said something so stupid, maybe Jar Jar would gain a movie. Darth Maul, though? That was from episode one, not three, which I don't see why you're saying it's "Revenge of the Sith" material. Horribly wrong.
Basically, you're taking the title from Star Wars: Episode Three, putting in a Star Wars, Episode One character, and getting a rating of a big fat Newgrounds Zero. Do you need any more numbers to go with this? How about the days of the week when better stuff could be put on the front page? Seven.
~Larry "Geno" Meyers